Disaster Risk Reduction as Measurement-Based Governance: Extending the Aswal Model of National Quality Infrastructure Through Traceable and Uncertainty-Aware Risk Assessment

IF 1.4 4区 工程技术 Q4 INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION
MAPAN Pub Date : 2026-04-21 DOI:10.1007/s12647-026-00922-5
Dinesh Kumar Aswal
{"title":"Disaster Risk Reduction as Measurement-Based Governance: Extending the Aswal Model of National Quality Infrastructure Through Traceable and Uncertainty-Aware Risk Assessment","authors":"Dinesh Kumar Aswal","doi":"10.1007/s12647-026-00922-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR) is increasingly determined by the quality of measurements, standards, institutional competence, and verification mechanisms that govern complex socio-technical systems. In infrastructure-intensive and hazard-prone economies, disaster risk is not merely an external contingency but a cumulative outcome of how physical, industrial, and digital systems are measured, regulated, and operated across their lifecycle. This article advances a measurement-based governance framework for DRR by extending the Aswal Model of National Quality Infrastructure and integrating metrology, standardization, accreditation, and conformity assessment into the disaster risk reduction cycle. The framework places continuous, traceable, and uncertainty-aware risk assessment—covering hazard, exposure, vulnerability, and capacity—at the core of governance, while interpreting preparedness, mitigation, response, and recovery as parameter-driven and auditable functions. A traceable measurement-to-governance chain is introduced to demonstrate how calibrated observations and validated models, supported by uncertainty characterisation and standards-based traceability, translate into decision thresholds, regulatory instruments, and operational actions, with audit and feedback enabling continuous improvement. The paper further shows how national disaster-risk policy, including the Prime Minister’s 10-Point Agenda on Disaster Risk Reduction, can be operationalised through existing quality-infrastructure mechanisms without institutional duplication. By embedding DRR within national quality infrastructure systems, the framework strengthens regulatory coherence, institutional reliability, auditability, and adaptive learning, highlighting the expanding role of measurement science as a foundational instrument of credible and resilient risk governance.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":689,"journal":{"name":"MAPAN","volume":"41 3","pages":"765 - 777"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MAPAN","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12647-026-00922-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR) is increasingly determined by the quality of measurements, standards, institutional competence, and verification mechanisms that govern complex socio-technical systems. In infrastructure-intensive and hazard-prone economies, disaster risk is not merely an external contingency but a cumulative outcome of how physical, industrial, and digital systems are measured, regulated, and operated across their lifecycle. This article advances a measurement-based governance framework for DRR by extending the Aswal Model of National Quality Infrastructure and integrating metrology, standardization, accreditation, and conformity assessment into the disaster risk reduction cycle. The framework places continuous, traceable, and uncertainty-aware risk assessment—covering hazard, exposure, vulnerability, and capacity—at the core of governance, while interpreting preparedness, mitigation, response, and recovery as parameter-driven and auditable functions. A traceable measurement-to-governance chain is introduced to demonstrate how calibrated observations and validated models, supported by uncertainty characterisation and standards-based traceability, translate into decision thresholds, regulatory instruments, and operational actions, with audit and feedback enabling continuous improvement. The paper further shows how national disaster-risk policy, including the Prime Minister’s 10-Point Agenda on Disaster Risk Reduction, can be operationalised through existing quality-infrastructure mechanisms without institutional duplication. By embedding DRR within national quality infrastructure systems, the framework strengthens regulatory coherence, institutional reliability, auditability, and adaptive learning, highlighting the expanding role of measurement science as a foundational instrument of credible and resilient risk governance.

灾害风险降低作为基于度量的治理:通过可追溯和不确定性风险评估扩展国家质量基础设施的Aswal模型
减少灾害风险(DRR)越来越多地取决于管理复杂社会技术系统的测量、标准、机构能力和核查机制的质量。在基础设施密集且容易发生灾害的经济体中,灾害风险不仅仅是一种外部突发事件,而是物理、工业和数字系统在其整个生命周期中如何测量、监管和运营的累积结果。本文通过扩展国家质量基础设施的Aswal模型,并将计量、标准化、认证和合格评估整合到减灾周期中,提出了一个基于测量的减灾治理框架。该框架将持续、可追踪和不确定性风险评估(涵盖危害、暴露、脆弱性和能力)置于治理的核心,同时将准备、缓解、响应和恢复解释为参数驱动和可审计的功能。引入了一个可追溯的度量到治理链,以演示如何通过不确定性特征和基于标准的可追溯性支持校准的观察和验证的模型,将其转化为决策阈值、监管工具和操作行动,并通过审计和反馈实现持续改进。该论文进一步展示了如何通过现有的高质量基础设施机制来实施国家灾害风险政策,包括总理关于减少灾害风险的10点议程,而不存在机构重复。通过将DRR纳入国家质量基础设施体系,该框架加强了监管一致性、制度可靠性、可审计性和适应性学习,突出了测量科学作为可信和有弹性风险治理的基础工具的日益扩大的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
MAPAN
MAPAN 工程技术-物理:应用
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
20.00%
发文量
91
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: MAPAN-Journal Metrology Society of India is a quarterly publication. It is exclusively devoted to Metrology (Scientific, Industrial or Legal). It has been fulfilling an important need of Metrologists and particularly of quality practitioners by publishing exclusive articles on scientific, industrial and legal metrology. The journal publishes research communication or technical articles of current interest in measurement science; original work, tutorial or survey papers in any metrology related area; reviews and analytical studies in metrology; case studies on reliability, uncertainty in measurements; and reports and results of intercomparison and proficiency testing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书