Disaster Risk Reduction as Measurement-Based Governance: Extending the Aswal Model of National Quality Infrastructure Through Traceable and Uncertainty-Aware Risk Assessment
{"title":"Disaster Risk Reduction as Measurement-Based Governance: Extending the Aswal Model of National Quality Infrastructure Through Traceable and Uncertainty-Aware Risk Assessment","authors":"Dinesh Kumar Aswal","doi":"10.1007/s12647-026-00922-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR) is increasingly determined by the quality of measurements, standards, institutional competence, and verification mechanisms that govern complex socio-technical systems. In infrastructure-intensive and hazard-prone economies, disaster risk is not merely an external contingency but a cumulative outcome of how physical, industrial, and digital systems are measured, regulated, and operated across their lifecycle. This article advances a measurement-based governance framework for DRR by extending the Aswal Model of National Quality Infrastructure and integrating metrology, standardization, accreditation, and conformity assessment into the disaster risk reduction cycle. The framework places continuous, traceable, and uncertainty-aware risk assessment—covering hazard, exposure, vulnerability, and capacity—at the core of governance, while interpreting preparedness, mitigation, response, and recovery as parameter-driven and auditable functions. A traceable measurement-to-governance chain is introduced to demonstrate how calibrated observations and validated models, supported by uncertainty characterisation and standards-based traceability, translate into decision thresholds, regulatory instruments, and operational actions, with audit and feedback enabling continuous improvement. The paper further shows how national disaster-risk policy, including the Prime Minister’s 10-Point Agenda on Disaster Risk Reduction, can be operationalised through existing quality-infrastructure mechanisms without institutional duplication. By embedding DRR within national quality infrastructure systems, the framework strengthens regulatory coherence, institutional reliability, auditability, and adaptive learning, highlighting the expanding role of measurement science as a foundational instrument of credible and resilient risk governance.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":689,"journal":{"name":"MAPAN","volume":"41 3","pages":"765 - 777"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MAPAN","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12647-026-00922-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR) is increasingly determined by the quality of measurements, standards, institutional competence, and verification mechanisms that govern complex socio-technical systems. In infrastructure-intensive and hazard-prone economies, disaster risk is not merely an external contingency but a cumulative outcome of how physical, industrial, and digital systems are measured, regulated, and operated across their lifecycle. This article advances a measurement-based governance framework for DRR by extending the Aswal Model of National Quality Infrastructure and integrating metrology, standardization, accreditation, and conformity assessment into the disaster risk reduction cycle. The framework places continuous, traceable, and uncertainty-aware risk assessment—covering hazard, exposure, vulnerability, and capacity—at the core of governance, while interpreting preparedness, mitigation, response, and recovery as parameter-driven and auditable functions. A traceable measurement-to-governance chain is introduced to demonstrate how calibrated observations and validated models, supported by uncertainty characterisation and standards-based traceability, translate into decision thresholds, regulatory instruments, and operational actions, with audit and feedback enabling continuous improvement. The paper further shows how national disaster-risk policy, including the Prime Minister’s 10-Point Agenda on Disaster Risk Reduction, can be operationalised through existing quality-infrastructure mechanisms without institutional duplication. By embedding DRR within national quality infrastructure systems, the framework strengthens regulatory coherence, institutional reliability, auditability, and adaptive learning, highlighting the expanding role of measurement science as a foundational instrument of credible and resilient risk governance.
期刊介绍:
MAPAN-Journal Metrology Society of India is a quarterly publication. It is exclusively devoted to Metrology (Scientific, Industrial or Legal). It has been fulfilling an important need of Metrologists and particularly of quality practitioners by publishing exclusive articles on scientific, industrial and legal metrology.
The journal publishes research communication or technical articles of current interest in measurement science; original work, tutorial or survey papers in any metrology related area; reviews and analytical studies in metrology; case studies on reliability, uncertainty in measurements; and reports and results of intercomparison and proficiency testing.