Analysis of evaluation indicators and development of a logic model-based performance evaluation framework for early childhood programs in the Center for Children's and Social Welfare Foodservice Management in South Korea: a mixed-methods study.

Korean journal of community nutrition Pub Date : 2026-08-01 Epub Date: 2026-08-31 DOI:10.5720/kjcn.2026.00122
Sohyun Park, Jieun Oh, Hyun Joo Ryou, Ji-Yun Hwang, Kirang Kim
{"title":"Analysis of evaluation indicators and development of a logic model-based performance evaluation framework for early childhood programs in the Center for Children's and Social Welfare Foodservice Management in South Korea: a mixed-methods study.","authors":"Sohyun Park, Jieun Oh, Hyun Joo Ryou, Ji-Yun Hwang, Kirang Kim","doi":"10.5720/kjcn.2026.00122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study analyzed the current evaluation indicators used for early childhood programs by the Center for Children's and Social Welfare Foodservice Management (CCFSM) in South Korea and developed a logic model-based performance evaluation framework to improve the system through outcome-oriented assessment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study comprised four stages. First, existing on-site evaluation indicators were mapped onto a logic model framework to assess their suitability for evaluating program effectiveness. Second, focus group interviews were conducted with stakeholders and experts to examine their understanding of, and perceived limitations in, the current evaluation system. Third, new outcome indicators were developed using checklist items for hygiene, safety, and nutrition management implemented across centers, and program effectiveness was evaluated using these indicators. Fourth, additional indicators were developed to assess the effectiveness of child-targeted nutrition and dietary education programs, and their practical applicability was examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The current evaluation indicators focused primarily on structural (input) and process measures, with limited emphasis on outcomes reflecting the ultimate program goals. Few indicators directly assessed improvements in children's health and dietary behaviors, and existing outcome measures relied largely on subjective satisfaction surveys completed by facility directors and parents. Based on the logic model, the proposed outcome indicators included, in the mid-term, improvements in hygiene, safety, and healthy eating practices scores, and, in the long-term, reductions in foodborne illness and food allergy incidents, increased fruit and vegetable intake, and decreased sodium and sugar intake.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings highlight the need to transition the CCFSM evaluation system toward a performance-oriented framework. A logic model-based evaluation system would improve accountability and better align evaluation practices with policy objectives, whereas phased implementation would help minimize operational burden on practitioners.</p>","PeriodicalId":74046,"journal":{"name":"Korean journal of community nutrition","volume":"31 4","pages":"360-373"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13563038/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean journal of community nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5720/kjcn.2026.00122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study analyzed the current evaluation indicators used for early childhood programs by the Center for Children's and Social Welfare Foodservice Management (CCFSM) in South Korea and developed a logic model-based performance evaluation framework to improve the system through outcome-oriented assessment.

Methods: The study comprised four stages. First, existing on-site evaluation indicators were mapped onto a logic model framework to assess their suitability for evaluating program effectiveness. Second, focus group interviews were conducted with stakeholders and experts to examine their understanding of, and perceived limitations in, the current evaluation system. Third, new outcome indicators were developed using checklist items for hygiene, safety, and nutrition management implemented across centers, and program effectiveness was evaluated using these indicators. Fourth, additional indicators were developed to assess the effectiveness of child-targeted nutrition and dietary education programs, and their practical applicability was examined.

Results: The current evaluation indicators focused primarily on structural (input) and process measures, with limited emphasis on outcomes reflecting the ultimate program goals. Few indicators directly assessed improvements in children's health and dietary behaviors, and existing outcome measures relied largely on subjective satisfaction surveys completed by facility directors and parents. Based on the logic model, the proposed outcome indicators included, in the mid-term, improvements in hygiene, safety, and healthy eating practices scores, and, in the long-term, reductions in foodborne illness and food allergy incidents, increased fruit and vegetable intake, and decreased sodium and sugar intake.

Conclusion: The findings highlight the need to transition the CCFSM evaluation system toward a performance-oriented framework. A logic model-based evaluation system would improve accountability and better align evaluation practices with policy objectives, whereas phased implementation would help minimize operational burden on practitioners.

韩国儿童与社会福利食品服务管理中心早期儿童项目评价指标分析及基于逻辑模型的绩效评价框架开发:一项混合方法研究。
目的:本研究分析了韩国儿童和社会福利食品服务管理中心(CCFSM)目前用于幼儿项目的评估指标,并开发了一个基于逻辑模型的绩效评估框架,通过结果导向的评估来改进系统。方法:研究分为四个阶段。首先,将现有的现场评价指标映射到逻辑模型框架中,以评估其对评价项目有效性的适用性。其次,与利益相关者和专家进行焦点小组访谈,以检查他们对当前评估系统的理解和感知的局限性。第三,利用各中心实施的卫生、安全和营养管理清单项目制定了新的结果指标,并利用这些指标评估了项目的有效性。第四,制定了额外的指标来评估针对儿童的营养和饮食教育项目的有效性,并对其实际适用性进行了检验。结果:目前的评估指标主要集中在结构(输入)和过程度量上,对反映最终规划目标的结果的强调有限。很少有指标直接评估儿童健康和饮食行为的改善情况,现有的结果衡量标准主要依赖于由设施主管和家长完成的主观满意度调查。根据逻辑模型,提出的结果指标包括:中期改善卫生、安全和健康饮食习惯得分,长期减少食源性疾病和食物过敏事件,增加水果和蔬菜摄入量,减少钠和糖摄入量。结论:研究结果强调需要将CCFSM评估系统转变为一个以绩效为导向的框架。基于逻辑模型的评估系统将改进问责制,并更好地将评估实践与政策目标结合起来,而分阶段实施将帮助最小化从业者的操作负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书