Development of a nutrition program for Koreans with type 2 diabetes based on the health belief model: a pre-post intervention study.

Korean journal of community nutrition Pub Date : 2026-08-01 Epub Date: 2026-08-31 DOI:10.5720/kjcn.2026.00234
Kyoung-Min Lee, EunSeok Cha, Han-Sol Park, Min-Sun Jeon
{"title":"Development of a nutrition program for Koreans with type 2 diabetes based on the health belief model: a pre-post intervention study.","authors":"Kyoung-Min Lee, EunSeok Cha, Han-Sol Park, Min-Sun Jeon","doi":"10.5720/kjcn.2026.00234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the effectiveness of a health belief model (HBM)-based nutrition education program in improving dietary behaviors, nutrition knowledge, and self-management among Koreans with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and to examine age-related differences and the effects of intervention delivery strategies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A pre-post intervention study was conducted among 21 adults with T2DM (glycated hemoglobin levels ≥ 7.5%) attending outpatient clinics at university hospitals in Korea. The HBM-based program incorporated passive learning strategies (lectures and videos) and active, experiential learning strategies. Nutrition knowledge, dietary attitudes, and dietary behaviors were assessed before and after the intervention. Participants' interest and satisfaction were also evaluated using interest-satisfaction analysis (ISA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nutrition knowledge and dietary behaviors improved significantly among adults following the intervention. Adults (n = 15) showed significant increases in nutrition knowledge (0.50 to 0.60, P < 0.05) and dietary behavior scores (2.26 to 2.47, P < 0.05), whereas no significant changes were observed among older adults (n = 6). The mean interest and satisfaction scores were 4.44 and 4.43 out of 5, respectively. Experiential learning strategies were associated with higher satisfaction than passive approaches. ISA showed that hands-on activities received the highest interest and satisfaction ratings, whereas passive methods were rated less favorably.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Participation in an HBM-based nutrition education program was associated with improved dietary behaviors among Koreans with T2DM in a clinical nutrition setting. Experiential learning approaches appeared to be more effective than passive methods, and the age-related differences observed suggest a need for tailored intervention strategies. These findings support the development of scalable, patient-centered nutrition interventions for chronic disease management.</p>","PeriodicalId":74046,"journal":{"name":"Korean journal of community nutrition","volume":"31 4","pages":"309-327"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13563040/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean journal of community nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5720/kjcn.2026.00234","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness of a health belief model (HBM)-based nutrition education program in improving dietary behaviors, nutrition knowledge, and self-management among Koreans with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and to examine age-related differences and the effects of intervention delivery strategies.

Methods: A pre-post intervention study was conducted among 21 adults with T2DM (glycated hemoglobin levels ≥ 7.5%) attending outpatient clinics at university hospitals in Korea. The HBM-based program incorporated passive learning strategies (lectures and videos) and active, experiential learning strategies. Nutrition knowledge, dietary attitudes, and dietary behaviors were assessed before and after the intervention. Participants' interest and satisfaction were also evaluated using interest-satisfaction analysis (ISA).

Results: Nutrition knowledge and dietary behaviors improved significantly among adults following the intervention. Adults (n = 15) showed significant increases in nutrition knowledge (0.50 to 0.60, P < 0.05) and dietary behavior scores (2.26 to 2.47, P < 0.05), whereas no significant changes were observed among older adults (n = 6). The mean interest and satisfaction scores were 4.44 and 4.43 out of 5, respectively. Experiential learning strategies were associated with higher satisfaction than passive approaches. ISA showed that hands-on activities received the highest interest and satisfaction ratings, whereas passive methods were rated less favorably.

Conclusion: Participation in an HBM-based nutrition education program was associated with improved dietary behaviors among Koreans with T2DM in a clinical nutrition setting. Experiential learning approaches appeared to be more effective than passive methods, and the age-related differences observed suggest a need for tailored intervention strategies. These findings support the development of scalable, patient-centered nutrition interventions for chronic disease management.

基于健康信念模型的韩国2型糖尿病患者营养计划的发展:干预前后研究。
目的:评估基于健康信念模型(HBM)的营养教育计划在改善韩国2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者饮食行为、营养知识和自我管理方面的有效性,并检查年龄相关差异和干预实施策略的效果。方法:对在韩国大学医院门诊就诊的21名成年T2DM患者(糖化血红蛋白水平≥7.5%)进行干预前后研究。以hbm为基础的课程结合了被动学习策略(讲座和视频)和主动体验式学习策略。在干预前后评估营养知识、饮食态度和饮食行为。参与者的兴趣和满意度也被评估使用兴趣满意度分析(ISA)。结果:干预后成人的营养知识和饮食行为有显著改善。成人(n = 15)的营养知识得分(0.50 ~ 0.60,P < 0.05)和饮食行为得分(2.26 ~ 2.47,P < 0.05)显著增加,而老年人(n = 6)无显著变化。平均兴趣和满意度分别为4.44分和4.43分(满分为5分)。体验式学习策略的满意度高于被动学习策略。ISA显示,动手活动获得了最高的兴趣和满意度评级,而被动方法则不太受欢迎。结论:参与以hbm为基础的营养教育项目与韩国T2DM患者在临床营养环境中的饮食行为改善有关。体验式学习方法似乎比被动方法更有效,观察到的年龄相关差异表明需要量身定制的干预策略。这些发现支持可扩展的、以患者为中心的慢性疾病管理营养干预的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书