Utilizing Inhibitor Screening Assay Results to Predict Bethesda Titers in Patients With Hemophilia A: Cost-Effective Strategy in Resource-Constrained Setting.
{"title":"Utilizing Inhibitor Screening Assay Results to Predict Bethesda Titers in Patients With Hemophilia A: Cost-Effective Strategy in Resource-Constrained Setting.","authors":"Dinesh Chandra, Manish Kumar Singh, Ruchi Gupta, Khaliqur Rahman, Prakhar Gupta, Anup Kumar, Jayanta Kumar Biswas, Yadav Sanjeev, Rajesh Kashyap","doi":"10.1111/ijlh.70233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The classical or modified Nijmegen-Bethesda assay measures FVIII inhibitor titers and requires testing residual FVIII levels at multiple serial dilutions, making it prohibitively expensive in resource-constrained settings. The study aimed to develop a cost-effective strategy to predict inhibitor titers (Bethesda units [BU]) in patients with hemophilia A (HA) using the inhibitor screening assay.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Inhibitor screening and Bethesda assay were performed on samples of suspected HA with inhibitors. The laboratory data were analyzed to develop a model to predict inhibitor titers from inhibitor screening (normalized ratio of APTT values of the fresh mix [FM] or incubated mix [IM]). The model was then prospectively validated on new inhibitor-positive samples.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and four samples from 83 patients with HA and inhibitors were analyzed. A linear regression analysis was performed, and the normalized APTT ratio of FM (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.815) proved to be highly predictive of inhibitor titers (BU) compared with IM (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.536). A predictive model was developed based on the normalized APTT ratio of FM values. This predictive model was then validated on a new cohort of 27 inhibitor-positive samples, where the predicted inhibitor titers strongly correlated with the observed titers (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.843).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The FM of the screening assay serves as a potential indicator of the expected inhibitor titers (BU) and guides the selection of dilutions likely to yield near-50% residual FVIII activity for estimating the Bethesda titers. This approach substantially reduces assay costs, particularly in cases with > 2 BU. Additional prospective studies are needed to validate these results.</p>","PeriodicalId":94050,"journal":{"name":"International journal of laboratory hematology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of laboratory hematology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ijlh.70233","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The classical or modified Nijmegen-Bethesda assay measures FVIII inhibitor titers and requires testing residual FVIII levels at multiple serial dilutions, making it prohibitively expensive in resource-constrained settings. The study aimed to develop a cost-effective strategy to predict inhibitor titers (Bethesda units [BU]) in patients with hemophilia A (HA) using the inhibitor screening assay.
Methods: Inhibitor screening and Bethesda assay were performed on samples of suspected HA with inhibitors. The laboratory data were analyzed to develop a model to predict inhibitor titers from inhibitor screening (normalized ratio of APTT values of the fresh mix [FM] or incubated mix [IM]). The model was then prospectively validated on new inhibitor-positive samples.
Results: One hundred and four samples from 83 patients with HA and inhibitors were analyzed. A linear regression analysis was performed, and the normalized APTT ratio of FM (R2 = 0.815) proved to be highly predictive of inhibitor titers (BU) compared with IM (R2 = 0.536). A predictive model was developed based on the normalized APTT ratio of FM values. This predictive model was then validated on a new cohort of 27 inhibitor-positive samples, where the predicted inhibitor titers strongly correlated with the observed titers (R2 = 0.843).
Conclusion: The FM of the screening assay serves as a potential indicator of the expected inhibitor titers (BU) and guides the selection of dilutions likely to yield near-50% residual FVIII activity for estimating the Bethesda titers. This approach substantially reduces assay costs, particularly in cases with > 2 BU. Additional prospective studies are needed to validate these results.