Dual-Task Exercises for Dynamic Balance, Motor Function, Functional Mobility, and Dual-Tasking in Individuals With Parkinson's Disease: A Meta-Analysis With Meta-Regression.

IF 2.8 Q1 REHABILITATION
Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine-ARM Pub Date : 2026-08-01 Epub Date: 2026-08-28 DOI:10.5535/arm.260060
Stanley J Winser, Mohammad Jobair Khan, Abu Jor, Priya Kannan
{"title":"Dual-Task Exercises for Dynamic Balance, Motor Function, Functional Mobility, and Dual-Tasking in Individuals With Parkinson's Disease: A Meta-Analysis With Meta-Regression.","authors":"Stanley J Winser, Mohammad Jobair Khan, Abu Jor, Priya Kannan","doi":"10.5535/arm.260060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To evaluate the (1) effectiveness of dual-task (DT) exercise in improving dynamic balance, motor function, functional mobility, dual-tasking, and falls, and (2) influence of DT intervention parameters on treatment effects in individuals with Parkinson's disease (PD). A comprehensive literature search was conducted across 12 electronic databases to identify relevant published articles from inception to September 2025. Risk of bias, methodological rigour, and evidence quality were evaluated using the RoB-2, PEDro, and GRADE tools, respectively. Dynamic balance, motor function, functional mobility, dual-tasking, and falls were assessed. Meta-analysis was performed to estimate intervention effects, and meta-regression evaluated how parameters of DT intervention affected treatment effects. The meta-analysis included 25 studies involving 1,162 individuals with PD. The mean PEDro score was 6.5, RoB-2 indicated a low risk of bias in 11 studies (45%), and GRADE indicated low to high evidence quality. Meta-analysis revealed significant improvements in dynamic balance (mean difference [MD]=4.45, 95% confidence interval [CI]=2.06 to 6.84; p<0.001), motor function (MD=-2.00, 95% CI=-3.32 to -0.67; p<0.001), functional mobility (MD=-1.64, 95% CI=-2.01 to -1.26; p<0.001), and dual-tasking (MD=-3.39, 95% CI=-4.67 to -2.11; p<0.001). Meta-regression revealed that dynamic balance improved with moderately challenging and moderate-intensity DT exercises, practised for 2 hours weekly with ≥90% session adherence. Subgroup meta-analyses revealed that practising for more than 4 weeks significantly improved dynamic balance and functional mobility. Compared with traditional single-task exercises, motor-cognitive DT exercises improved dynamic balance, functional mobility, motor function, and dual-tasking. Further studies examining the effects of DT exercises on falls among individuals with PD are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":47738,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine-ARM","volume":"50 4","pages":"244-264"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13554922/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine-ARM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.260060","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To evaluate the (1) effectiveness of dual-task (DT) exercise in improving dynamic balance, motor function, functional mobility, dual-tasking, and falls, and (2) influence of DT intervention parameters on treatment effects in individuals with Parkinson's disease (PD). A comprehensive literature search was conducted across 12 electronic databases to identify relevant published articles from inception to September 2025. Risk of bias, methodological rigour, and evidence quality were evaluated using the RoB-2, PEDro, and GRADE tools, respectively. Dynamic balance, motor function, functional mobility, dual-tasking, and falls were assessed. Meta-analysis was performed to estimate intervention effects, and meta-regression evaluated how parameters of DT intervention affected treatment effects. The meta-analysis included 25 studies involving 1,162 individuals with PD. The mean PEDro score was 6.5, RoB-2 indicated a low risk of bias in 11 studies (45%), and GRADE indicated low to high evidence quality. Meta-analysis revealed significant improvements in dynamic balance (mean difference [MD]=4.45, 95% confidence interval [CI]=2.06 to 6.84; p<0.001), motor function (MD=-2.00, 95% CI=-3.32 to -0.67; p<0.001), functional mobility (MD=-1.64, 95% CI=-2.01 to -1.26; p<0.001), and dual-tasking (MD=-3.39, 95% CI=-4.67 to -2.11; p<0.001). Meta-regression revealed that dynamic balance improved with moderately challenging and moderate-intensity DT exercises, practised for 2 hours weekly with ≥90% session adherence. Subgroup meta-analyses revealed that practising for more than 4 weeks significantly improved dynamic balance and functional mobility. Compared with traditional single-task exercises, motor-cognitive DT exercises improved dynamic balance, functional mobility, motor function, and dual-tasking. Further studies examining the effects of DT exercises on falls among individuals with PD are warranted.

双任务练习对帕金森病患者动态平衡、运动功能、功能活动性和双任务的影响:一项meta -回归分析
评估(1)双任务(DT)运动在改善动态平衡、运动功能、功能活动能力、双任务和跌倒方面的有效性;(2)DT干预参数对帕金森病(PD)个体治疗效果的影响。在12个电子数据库中进行了全面的文献检索,以确定从成立到2025年9月的相关已发表文章。分别使用rob2、PEDro和GRADE工具评估偏倚风险、方法学严谨性和证据质量。评估动态平衡、运动功能、功能活动、双重任务和跌倒。meta分析评估干预效果,meta回归评估DT干预参数对治疗效果的影响。荟萃分析包括25项研究,涉及1162名PD患者。平均PEDro评分为6.5,11项研究(45%)的rob2表示低偏倚风险,GRADE表示低到高的证据质量。meta分析显示动态平衡有显著改善(平均差异[MD]=4.45, 95%可信区间[CI]=2.06 ~ 6.84
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
32
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书