Psychological Interventions for Reducing Interpersonal Problems and Enhancing Interpersonal Competence among Adolescents with Posttraumatic Stress Symptoms: A Meta-Analysis.
{"title":"Psychological Interventions for Reducing Interpersonal Problems and Enhancing Interpersonal Competence among Adolescents with Posttraumatic Stress Symptoms: A Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Sabrina Ee-Ying Ong, Sayedhabibollah Ahmadi Forooshani, Zahra Izadikhah, Govind Krishnamoorthy","doi":"10.1007/s40653-026-00854-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study examined the effectiveness of psychological interventions in reducing interpersonal problems and enhancing interpersonal competence among adolescents with posttraumatic stress symptoms. A systematic search of PsycInfo, PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL and Google Scholar identified 17 studies that met the inclusion criteria, with 12 effect sizes reported for interpersonal competence and 24 for interpersonal problems. Results showed similar small but statistically significant aggregated post-intervention effect for both interpersonal competence (g = 0.37, p < 0.001, 95% CI [0.20, 0.55]) and interpersonal problems (g = 0.40, p < 0.001, 95% CI [0.25, 0.54]), with intervention type and mode significantly moderating effects only for interpersonal problems. Trauma-focused Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (TF-CBT) had the largest effect on interpersonal problems, whereas skill-based interventions had the smallest. Mixed-mode interventions also showed a significantly larger effect on interpersonal problems compared to group interventions. In contrast, neither intervention type nor mode significantly moderated effects on interpersonal competence. Furthermore, insufficient follow-up data precluded evaluation of the long-term effects of interventions. This meta-analysis indicates that current interventions have small but significant aggregated post-intervention effects on both interpersonal competence and interpersonal problems, with effectiveness influenced by intervention type and mode. However, this meta-analysis is limited by small inclusion number, inclusion of heterogenous assessments, and insufficient data to examine moderating effects of gender and age. This study identified gaps in existing evidence-based interventions simultaneously targeting both interpersonal competence and interpersonal problems. Moreover, a lack of sufficient follow-up assessments raises concerns about the long-term effectiveness of existing interventions. These findings underscore the need for integrative, evidence-based interventions that target both competence and maladaptive aspects of interpersonal functioning, as well as for further high-quality studies to rigorously evaluate their long-term effectiveness across diverse adolescent populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":44763,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma","volume":"19 3","pages":"1611-1633"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13546249/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40653-026-00854-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study examined the effectiveness of psychological interventions in reducing interpersonal problems and enhancing interpersonal competence among adolescents with posttraumatic stress symptoms. A systematic search of PsycInfo, PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL and Google Scholar identified 17 studies that met the inclusion criteria, with 12 effect sizes reported for interpersonal competence and 24 for interpersonal problems. Results showed similar small but statistically significant aggregated post-intervention effect for both interpersonal competence (g = 0.37, p < 0.001, 95% CI [0.20, 0.55]) and interpersonal problems (g = 0.40, p < 0.001, 95% CI [0.25, 0.54]), with intervention type and mode significantly moderating effects only for interpersonal problems. Trauma-focused Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (TF-CBT) had the largest effect on interpersonal problems, whereas skill-based interventions had the smallest. Mixed-mode interventions also showed a significantly larger effect on interpersonal problems compared to group interventions. In contrast, neither intervention type nor mode significantly moderated effects on interpersonal competence. Furthermore, insufficient follow-up data precluded evaluation of the long-term effects of interventions. This meta-analysis indicates that current interventions have small but significant aggregated post-intervention effects on both interpersonal competence and interpersonal problems, with effectiveness influenced by intervention type and mode. However, this meta-analysis is limited by small inclusion number, inclusion of heterogenous assessments, and insufficient data to examine moderating effects of gender and age. This study identified gaps in existing evidence-based interventions simultaneously targeting both interpersonal competence and interpersonal problems. Moreover, a lack of sufficient follow-up assessments raises concerns about the long-term effectiveness of existing interventions. These findings underscore the need for integrative, evidence-based interventions that target both competence and maladaptive aspects of interpersonal functioning, as well as for further high-quality studies to rigorously evaluate their long-term effectiveness across diverse adolescent populations.
本研究探讨心理干预在减少创伤后应激症状青少年人际关系问题和提高人际交往能力方面的效果。通过对PsycInfo、PubMed、Scopus、CINAHL和b谷歌Scholar的系统搜索,我们发现了17项符合纳入标准的研究,其中12项研究报告了人际能力的效应量,24项研究报告了人际问题的效应量。结果显示,干预后对人际交往能力的总体影响虽小,但具有统计学意义(g = 0.37, p
期刊介绍:
Underpinned by a biopsychosocial approach, the Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma presents original research and prevention and treatment strategies for understanding and dealing with symptoms and disorders related to the psychological effects of trauma experienced by children and adolescents during childhood and where the impact of these experiences continues into adulthood. The journal also examines intervention models directed toward the individual, family, and community, new theoretical models and approaches, and public policy proposals and innovations. In addition, the journal promotes rigorous investigation and debate on the human capacity for agency, resilience and longer-term healing in the face of child and adolescent trauma. With a multidisciplinary approach that draws input from the psychological, medical, social work, sociological, public health, legal and education fields, the journal features research, intervention approaches and evidence-based programs, theoretical articles, specific review articles, brief reports and case studies, and commentaries on current and/or controversial topics. The journal also encourages submissions from less heard voices, for example in terms of geography, minority status or service user perspectives.
Among the topics examined in the Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma:
The effects of childhood maltreatment
Loss, natural disasters, and political conflict
Exposure to or victimization from family or community violence
Racial, ethnic, gender, sexual orientation or class discrimination
Physical injury, diseases, and painful or debilitating medical treatments
The impact of poverty, social deprivation and inequality
Barriers and facilitators on pathways to recovery
The Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma is an important resource for practitioners, policymakers, researchers, and academics whose work is centered on children exposed to traumatic events and adults exposed to traumatic events as children.