The Ontological Primacy of Being-With: Caring as Communion.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Cyruz P Tuppal
{"title":"The Ontological Primacy of Being-With: Caring as Communion.","authors":"Cyruz P Tuppal","doi":"10.1111/scs.70314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Caring science has consistently emphasised relationality as central to nursing and human health; however, its ontological grounding remains insufficiently articulated. Prevailing models often rely on interactional paradigms that conceptualise caring as exchanges between discrete individuals, thereby overlooking the deeper existential condition that renders caring encounters meaningful.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aims to articulate the ontological primacy of being-with as the foundational ground of caring and to advance the Theory of Communion-in-Caring as its fulfilment.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A hermeneutic philosophical inquiry was conducted using interpretive analysis, comparative philosophical examination, and conceptual synthesis. Foundational works from Martin Heidegger, Martin Buber, Emmanuel Levinas, Maurice Merleau-Ponty, and Gabriel Marcel were integrated with key caring science traditions to construct a coherent ontological framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Being-with is conceptualised as a primordial ontological condition expressed through three interrelated structures: Relational co-presence, dialogical openness, and embodied attunement. These structures constitute the ground of caring encounters and converge in communion, understood as a shared field of presence, meaning, and ethical responsiveness. Communion represents the ontological fulfilment of relational existence, wherein caring is enacted as participatory, embodied, and ethically grounded presence.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The ontology of being-with provides a rigorous philosophical foundation for caring science, reconfiguring caring as a mode of being rather than a set of tasks or interactions. By positioning communion as the fulfilment of relational existence, the Theory of Communion-in-Caring advances theoretical coherence and offers a foundation for future empirical, methodological, and practice-based developments.</p>","PeriodicalId":48171,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences","volume":"40 3","pages":"e70314"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13547972/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/scs.70314","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Caring science has consistently emphasised relationality as central to nursing and human health; however, its ontological grounding remains insufficiently articulated. Prevailing models often rely on interactional paradigms that conceptualise caring as exchanges between discrete individuals, thereby overlooking the deeper existential condition that renders caring encounters meaningful.

Aim: This study aims to articulate the ontological primacy of being-with as the foundational ground of caring and to advance the Theory of Communion-in-Caring as its fulfilment.

Method: A hermeneutic philosophical inquiry was conducted using interpretive analysis, comparative philosophical examination, and conceptual synthesis. Foundational works from Martin Heidegger, Martin Buber, Emmanuel Levinas, Maurice Merleau-Ponty, and Gabriel Marcel were integrated with key caring science traditions to construct a coherent ontological framework.

Results: Being-with is conceptualised as a primordial ontological condition expressed through three interrelated structures: Relational co-presence, dialogical openness, and embodied attunement. These structures constitute the ground of caring encounters and converge in communion, understood as a shared field of presence, meaning, and ethical responsiveness. Communion represents the ontological fulfilment of relational existence, wherein caring is enacted as participatory, embodied, and ethically grounded presence.

Conclusion: The ontology of being-with provides a rigorous philosophical foundation for caring science, reconfiguring caring as a mode of being rather than a set of tasks or interactions. By positioning communion as the fulfilment of relational existence, the Theory of Communion-in-Caring advances theoretical coherence and offers a foundation for future empirical, methodological, and practice-based developments.

存在的本体论首要:关怀作为交流。
背景:护理科学一直强调关系是护理和人类健康的核心;然而,它的本体论基础仍然没有充分阐明。流行的模式往往依赖于相互作用的范式,这种范式将关怀概念化为离散个体之间的交流,从而忽略了使关怀相遇有意义的更深层次的存在条件。目的:本研究旨在阐明“与”的本体论首要地位是关怀的基础,并推动“关怀中的共融”理论的实现。方法:运用解释性分析、比较哲学检验和概念综合进行解释性哲学探究。马丁·海德格尔、马丁·布伯、伊曼纽尔·列维纳斯、莫里斯·梅洛-庞蒂和加布里埃尔·马塞尔的基础著作与关键的护理科学传统相结合,构建了一个连贯的本体论框架。结果:“与”被概念化为通过三个相互关联的结构来表达的原始本体论条件:关系共存在、对话开放和体现调谐。这些结构构成了关怀相遇的基础,并在交流中汇聚,被理解为存在、意义和道德回应的共享领域。共融代表关系存在的本体论实现,其中关怀被制定为参与性的、具体化的和基于伦理的存在。结论:“与”的本体论为关怀科学提供了严谨的哲学基础,将关怀重新配置为一种存在模式,而不是一组任务或互动。通过将共融定位为关系存在的实现,关怀共融理论推进了理论一致性,并为未来的实证、方法论和基于实践的发展奠定了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
5.30%
发文量
71
期刊介绍: Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences is an established quarterly, peer reviewed Journal with an outstanding international reputation. As the official publication of the Nordic College of Caring Science, the Journal shares their mission to contribute to the development and advancement of scientific knowledge on caring related to health, well-being, illness and the alleviation of human suffering. The emphasis is on research that has a patient, family and community focus and which promotes an interdisciplinary team approach. Of special interest are scholarly articles addressing and initiating dialogue on theoretical, empirical and methodological concerns related to critical issues. All articles are expected to demonstrate respect for human dignity and accountability to society. In addition to original research the Journal also publishes reviews, meta-syntheses and meta-analyses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书