When Tobacco and Cannabis Use Motives Interact: Implications for Dependence and Quitting.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Tangui Barré, Géraldine Cazorla, Vincent Leroy, Gwenaëlle Maradan, Clotilde Couderc, Julia de Ternay, Carlotta Magnani, Patrizia Carrieri, Camelia Protopopescu
{"title":"When Tobacco and Cannabis Use Motives Interact: Implications for Dependence and Quitting.","authors":"Tangui Barré, Géraldine Cazorla, Vincent Leroy, Gwenaëlle Maradan, Clotilde Couderc, Julia de Ternay, Carlotta Magnani, Patrizia Carrieri, Camelia Protopopescu","doi":"10.1080/10826084.2026.2723589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tobacco and cannabis co-use is a major public health issue among young adults. Little is known about how motives for using these substances interact and affect co-use behaviors. This study explores these associations and identify distinct motivational profiles among young people who co-use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 357 French young adults (18-30 years; 54.9% men) reporting co-use. Participants indicated (Yes/No) their endorsement of 21 motives (10 tobacco-related, 11 cannabis-related, 7 shared). Correlations were computed between all motives. Hierarchical clustering identified distinct motivational profiles. Associations between profiles, motives, dependence, and readiness to quit were examined using regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most within-substance motives and all shared cross-substance motives were correlated. Three clusters emerged: (1) high tobacco/moderate cannabis motive endorsement (<i>n</i> = 188), with high nicotine dependence; (2) low overall motive endorsement (except pleasure) and low dependence levels (<i>n</i> = 39); and (3) high endorsement of both tobacco and cannabis motives, with high dependence levels (<i>n</i> = 130). The number of endorsed tobacco motives was negatively associated with readiness to quit tobacco but positively associated with readiness to quit cannabis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While tobacco and cannabis motives overlapped, these findings underscore the need to consider motivational patterns when designing tailored interventions to reduce co-use-related harms.</p>","PeriodicalId":22088,"journal":{"name":"Substance Use & Misuse","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Substance Use & Misuse","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10826084.2026.2723589","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Tobacco and cannabis co-use is a major public health issue among young adults. Little is known about how motives for using these substances interact and affect co-use behaviors. This study explores these associations and identify distinct motivational profiles among young people who co-use.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 357 French young adults (18-30 years; 54.9% men) reporting co-use. Participants indicated (Yes/No) their endorsement of 21 motives (10 tobacco-related, 11 cannabis-related, 7 shared). Correlations were computed between all motives. Hierarchical clustering identified distinct motivational profiles. Associations between profiles, motives, dependence, and readiness to quit were examined using regression models.

Results: Most within-substance motives and all shared cross-substance motives were correlated. Three clusters emerged: (1) high tobacco/moderate cannabis motive endorsement (n = 188), with high nicotine dependence; (2) low overall motive endorsement (except pleasure) and low dependence levels (n = 39); and (3) high endorsement of both tobacco and cannabis motives, with high dependence levels (n = 130). The number of endorsed tobacco motives was negatively associated with readiness to quit tobacco but positively associated with readiness to quit cannabis.

Conclusions: While tobacco and cannabis motives overlapped, these findings underscore the need to consider motivational patterns when designing tailored interventions to reduce co-use-related harms.

当烟草和大麻使用动机相互作用:对依赖和戒烟的影响。
背景:烟草和大麻的共同使用是年轻人中的一个主要公共卫生问题。关于使用这些物质的动机如何相互作用并影响共同使用行为,我们知之甚少。本研究探讨了这些关联,并确定了共同使用手机的年轻人的不同动机特征。方法:对357名法国年轻人(18-30岁,男性54.9%)进行了横断面调查。与会者表示(是/否)他们支持21项动机(10项与烟草有关,11项与大麻有关,7项相同)。计算了所有动机之间的相关性。分层聚类识别出不同的动机概况。档案、动机、依赖和戒烟准备之间的关联使用回归模型进行了检验。结果:大部分物质内动机与所有共有的跨物质动机相关。出现了三个集群:(1)高烟草/中度大麻动机支持(n = 188),尼古丁依赖性高;(2)整体动机认同低(除愉悦外),依赖水平低(n = 39);(3)对烟草和大麻动机的高度认可,且依赖程度高(n = 130)。认可烟草动机的数量与戒烟意愿呈负相关,但与戒烟意愿呈正相关。结论:虽然烟草和大麻的动机重叠,但这些发现强调了在设计有针对性的干预措施以减少共同使用相关危害时考虑动机模式的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Substance Use & Misuse
Substance Use & Misuse 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
200
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: For over 50 years, Substance Use & Misuse (formerly The International Journal of the Addictions) has provided a unique international multidisciplinary venue for the exchange of original research, theories, policy analyses, and unresolved issues concerning substance use and misuse (licit and illicit drugs, alcohol, nicotine, and eating disorders). Guest editors for special issues devoted to single topics of current concern are invited. Topics covered include: Clinical trials and clinical research (treatment and prevention of substance misuse and related infectious diseases) Epidemiology of substance misuse and related infectious diseases Social pharmacology Meta-analyses and systematic reviews Translation of scientific findings to real world clinical and other settings Adolescent and student-focused research State of the art quantitative and qualitative research Policy analyses Negative results and intervention failures that are instructive Validity studies of instruments, scales, and tests that are generalizable Critiques and essays on unresolved issues Authors can choose to publish gold open access in this journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书