Childhood Trauma and Aggression: The Role of Epistemic Trust.

IF 2.2 Q2 FAMILY STUDIES
Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma Pub Date : 2026-03-17 eCollection Date: 2026-09-01 DOI:10.1007/s40653-026-00841-2
Carlo Garofalo, Veronica Raspa, Elisa Delvecchio, Irene Aiolfi, Daniela Laricchiuta, Richard Howard, Claudia Mazzeschi
{"title":"Childhood Trauma and Aggression: The Role of Epistemic Trust.","authors":"Carlo Garofalo, Veronica Raspa, Elisa Delvecchio, Irene Aiolfi, Daniela Laricchiuta, Richard Howard, Claudia Mazzeschi","doi":"10.1007/s40653-026-00841-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The relation between childhood trauma and aggression is well-established. Yet, empirical findings are inconclusive regarding specific associations between types of childhood trauma and distinct types of aggression, as well as regarding possible mechanisms explaining their association. We examined associations that physical and emotional abuse, physical and emotional neglect, and sexual abuse had with four aggression types according to the Quadripartite Violence Typology, as well as their indirect effects through epistemic trust, mistrust, and credulity in a community sample of 251 adult participants (54.2% women; <i>M</i> <sub><i>age</i></sub> = 31.33, <i>SD</i> = 11.20). Levels of childhood trauma were positively linked to higher levels of aggression and lower levels of epistemic trust. At the subscale-level, emotional abuse had the most consistent associations. Epistemic mistrust was consistently linked to aggression and helped explain relationships between childhood traumatic experiences and aggression. Accounting for the overlap across types of childhood trauma, only sexual abuse exerted unique effects, while most of the main findings were accounted by the shared variance among physical and emotional abuse and neglect. Childhood trauma emerged as a consistent yet non-specific risk factor for different types of aggression. Mistrust in others as sources of trustworthy information may be one pathway linking early traumatic experiences with later aggressive behavior.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s40653-026-00841-2.</p>","PeriodicalId":44763,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma","volume":"19 3","pages":"1581-1595"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13546256/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40653-026-00841-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The relation between childhood trauma and aggression is well-established. Yet, empirical findings are inconclusive regarding specific associations between types of childhood trauma and distinct types of aggression, as well as regarding possible mechanisms explaining their association. We examined associations that physical and emotional abuse, physical and emotional neglect, and sexual abuse had with four aggression types according to the Quadripartite Violence Typology, as well as their indirect effects through epistemic trust, mistrust, and credulity in a community sample of 251 adult participants (54.2% women; M age = 31.33, SD = 11.20). Levels of childhood trauma were positively linked to higher levels of aggression and lower levels of epistemic trust. At the subscale-level, emotional abuse had the most consistent associations. Epistemic mistrust was consistently linked to aggression and helped explain relationships between childhood traumatic experiences and aggression. Accounting for the overlap across types of childhood trauma, only sexual abuse exerted unique effects, while most of the main findings were accounted by the shared variance among physical and emotional abuse and neglect. Childhood trauma emerged as a consistent yet non-specific risk factor for different types of aggression. Mistrust in others as sources of trustworthy information may be one pathway linking early traumatic experiences with later aggressive behavior.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s40653-026-00841-2.

儿童创伤与攻击:认知信任的作用。
童年创伤和攻击性之间的关系是公认的。然而,关于儿童创伤类型和不同类型的攻击之间的具体联系,以及解释它们之间联系的可能机制,实证研究结果尚无定论。我们研究了身体和情感虐待、身体和情感忽视和性虐待与四种攻击类型的关联,以及它们通过认知信任、不信任和轻信产生的间接影响,根据四方暴力类型,在251名成年参与者的社区样本中(54.2%为女性,M年龄= 31.33,SD = 11.20)。童年创伤程度与较高的攻击性和较低的认知信任水平呈正相关。在亚量表水平上,情感虐待具有最一致的关联。认知上的不信任一直与攻击性有关,并有助于解释童年创伤经历与攻击性之间的关系。考虑到不同类型的童年创伤的重叠,只有性虐待有独特的影响,而大多数主要发现都是由身体和情感虐待和忽视的共同差异来解释的。童年创伤是不同类型攻击的一个一致但非特定的风险因素。对他人作为可靠信息来源的不信任可能是将早期创伤经历与后来的攻击行为联系起来的一条途径。补充信息:在线版本包含补充资料,可在https://doi.org/10.1007/s40653-026-00841-2上获得。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
71
期刊介绍: Underpinned by a biopsychosocial approach, the Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma presents original research and prevention and treatment strategies for understanding and dealing with symptoms and disorders related to the psychological effects of trauma experienced by children and adolescents during childhood and where the impact of these experiences continues into adulthood. The journal also examines intervention models directed toward the individual, family, and community, new theoretical models and approaches, and public policy proposals and innovations. In addition, the journal promotes rigorous investigation and debate on the human capacity for agency, resilience and longer-term healing in the face of child and adolescent trauma. With a multidisciplinary approach that draws input from the psychological, medical, social work, sociological, public health, legal and education fields, the journal features research, intervention approaches and evidence-based programs, theoretical articles, specific review articles, brief reports and case studies, and commentaries on current and/or controversial topics. The journal also encourages submissions from less heard voices, for example in terms of geography, minority status or service user perspectives. Among the topics examined in the Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma: The effects of childhood maltreatment Loss, natural disasters, and political conflict Exposure to or victimization from family or community violence Racial, ethnic, gender, sexual orientation or class discrimination Physical injury, diseases, and painful or debilitating medical treatments The impact of poverty, social deprivation and inequality Barriers and facilitators on pathways to recovery The Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma is an important resource for practitioners, policymakers, researchers, and academics whose work is centered on children exposed to traumatic events and adults exposed to traumatic events as children.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书