Empowering Adherence Assessment: Translating and Validating the 15-STARS Questionnaire for Use in Taiwanese Community Pharmacies.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Patient preference and adherence Pub Date : 2026-09-02 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.2147/PPA.S634977
Yung-Hsuan Chang, Yen-Ming Huang, Yu-Meng Yang, Tzu Wang, Hsun-Yu Chan, Chia-Chen Yang, Isabelle Arnet, Christiane Eickhoff, Yunn-Fang Ho
{"title":"Empowering Adherence Assessment: Translating and Validating the 15-STARS Questionnaire for Use in Taiwanese Community Pharmacies.","authors":"Yung-Hsuan Chang, Yen-Ming Huang, Yu-Meng Yang, Tzu Wang, Hsun-Yu Chan, Chia-Chen Yang, Isabelle Arnet, Christiane Eickhoff, Yunn-Fang Ho","doi":"10.2147/PPA.S634977","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Medication adherence is a key determinant of treatment effectiveness, yet few brief, freely available, and culturally appropriate adherence assessment tools are available in Traditional Chinese for use in routine community pharmacy practice. The 15-item Screening Tool for AdheRence to medicineS (15-STARS) is a pharmacy-based questionnaire designed to identify medication non-adherence and its underlying barriers.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To translate, culturally adapt, and validate the 15-STARS in Traditional Chinese and evaluate its utility for screening medication non-adherence and identifying barriers to adherence among patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) in Taiwanese community pharmacies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study comprised two sequential phases: translation and cross-cultural adaptation, followed by field testing. Translation involved forward-backward translation and cognitive debriefing with pharmacists and patients. The Traditional Chinese 15-STARS was administered to adults with T2D recruited from six community pharmacies in Taiwan. Psychometric evaluation included content validity, item-level criterion validity against the Traditional Chinese Adherence to Refills and Medications Scale (ChARMS-T), and internal consistency assessed using McDonald's omega (ω). Associations among adherence, medication-related factors, and glycemic control were examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten pharmacists and ten patients participated in cognitive debriefing, and 215 patients completed field testing. Content validity was excellent, with item-level and scale-level content validity indices of 1.00 after revision. Items 6-9 demonstrated good internal consistency (ω = 0.831), and selected 15-STARS items were significantly correlated with corresponding ChARMS-T measures. Among the participants, 53.0% of participants reported no missed medication doses during the previous two weeks, whereas 47.0% reported missing at least one dose. The most common reasons for non-adherence were forgetfulness (33.0%), concerns about taking too many medications (18.6%), and concerns about side effects (15.3%). Greater regimen complexity and higher dosing frequency were associated with lower adherence and poorer glycemic control.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Traditional Chinese 15-STARS demonstrated satisfactory content validity, evidence of criterion validity for selected items, and internal consistency among conceptually related belief-based items in Taiwanese community pharmacies. The instrument may serve as a practical screening tool for identifying patients at risk of non-adherence and exploring adherence-related barriers, thereby supporting targeted pharmacist-led interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":19972,"journal":{"name":"Patient preference and adherence","volume":"20 ","pages":"634977"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13546686/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patient preference and adherence","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S634977","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Medication adherence is a key determinant of treatment effectiveness, yet few brief, freely available, and culturally appropriate adherence assessment tools are available in Traditional Chinese for use in routine community pharmacy practice. The 15-item Screening Tool for AdheRence to medicineS (15-STARS) is a pharmacy-based questionnaire designed to identify medication non-adherence and its underlying barriers.

Objective: To translate, culturally adapt, and validate the 15-STARS in Traditional Chinese and evaluate its utility for screening medication non-adherence and identifying barriers to adherence among patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) in Taiwanese community pharmacies.

Methods: This cross-sectional study comprised two sequential phases: translation and cross-cultural adaptation, followed by field testing. Translation involved forward-backward translation and cognitive debriefing with pharmacists and patients. The Traditional Chinese 15-STARS was administered to adults with T2D recruited from six community pharmacies in Taiwan. Psychometric evaluation included content validity, item-level criterion validity against the Traditional Chinese Adherence to Refills and Medications Scale (ChARMS-T), and internal consistency assessed using McDonald's omega (ω). Associations among adherence, medication-related factors, and glycemic control were examined.

Results: Ten pharmacists and ten patients participated in cognitive debriefing, and 215 patients completed field testing. Content validity was excellent, with item-level and scale-level content validity indices of 1.00 after revision. Items 6-9 demonstrated good internal consistency (ω = 0.831), and selected 15-STARS items were significantly correlated with corresponding ChARMS-T measures. Among the participants, 53.0% of participants reported no missed medication doses during the previous two weeks, whereas 47.0% reported missing at least one dose. The most common reasons for non-adherence were forgetfulness (33.0%), concerns about taking too many medications (18.6%), and concerns about side effects (15.3%). Greater regimen complexity and higher dosing frequency were associated with lower adherence and poorer glycemic control.

Conclusion: The Traditional Chinese 15-STARS demonstrated satisfactory content validity, evidence of criterion validity for selected items, and internal consistency among conceptually related belief-based items in Taiwanese community pharmacies. The instrument may serve as a practical screening tool for identifying patients at risk of non-adherence and exploring adherence-related barriers, thereby supporting targeted pharmacist-led interventions.

授权依从性评估:台湾社区药房15星问卷的翻译与验证。
背景:药物依从性是治疗效果的关键决定因素,然而,在常规社区药房实践中,很少有简洁性、可免费获得且文化上适合的传统中文依从性评估工具。15项药物依从性筛查工具(15-STARS)是一份基于药学的问卷,旨在确定药物依从性及其潜在障碍。目的:翻译、文化适应和验证繁体中文15-STARS量表,并评估其在台湾社区药房筛选2型糖尿病(T2D)患者药物不依从性和确定依从性障碍方面的效用。方法:本横断面研究包括两个连续的阶段:翻译和跨文化适应,然后是实地测试。翻译包括前后翻译和对药剂师和病人的认知汇报。从台湾6个社区药房招募成人T2D患者,给予15-STARS。心理测量评估包括内容效度、项目级标准效度(对照中国传统药品依从性量表(ChARMS-T))和内部一致性评估(采用麦当劳ω)。研究了依从性、药物相关因素和血糖控制之间的关系。结果:10名药师和10名患者参加了认知说明会,215名患者完成了现场测试。内容效度极好,修订后的项目级和量表级内容效度指标均为1.00。项目6-9具有良好的内部一致性(ω = 0.831),所选的15-STARS项目与相应的ChARMS-T测量值显著相关。在参与者中,53.0%的参与者报告在前两周内没有漏服药物剂量,而47.0%的参与者报告至少漏服一次药物剂量。最常见的原因是健忘(33.0%)、担心服用过多药物(18.6%)和担心副作用(15.3%)。较高的方案复杂性和较高的给药频率与较低的依从性和较差的血糖控制有关。结论:传统中文15星量表在台湾社区药店具有满意的内容效度、所选项目的效度证据、概念相关信念项目的内部一致性。该仪器可作为一种实用的筛选工具,用于识别有不依从性风险的患者,并探索与依从性相关的障碍,从而支持有针对性的药剂师主导的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Patient preference and adherence
Patient preference and adherence MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.50%
发文量
354
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Patient Preference and Adherence is an international, peer reviewed, open access journal that focuses on the growing importance of patient preference and adherence throughout the therapeutic continuum. The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of reviews, original research, modeling and clinical studies across all therapeutic areas. Patient satisfaction, acceptability, quality of life, compliance, persistence and their role in developing new therapeutic modalities and compounds to optimize clinical outcomes for existing disease states are major areas of interest for the journal. As of 1st April 2019, Patient Preference and Adherence will no longer consider meta-analyses for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书