Development of the Japanese version of the Manchester short assessment of quality of life (MANSA) among people with self-reported severe mental illness.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Masako Kageyama, Kayo Ichihashi, Momoko Kusaka, Keiko Yokoyama
{"title":"Development of the Japanese version of the Manchester short assessment of quality of life (MANSA) among people with self-reported severe mental illness.","authors":"Masako Kageyama, Kayo Ichihashi, Momoko Kusaka, Keiko Yokoyama","doi":"10.1007/s11136-026-04381-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The Manchester Short Assessment of Quality of Life (MANSA) is a quality-of-life (QOL) instrument developed for people with mental illness. This study aimed to develop a Japanese version of the MANSA for people with severe mental illness (SMI) and examine associations between individual MANSA domains and psychiatric diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The MANSA includes 12 self-rated subjective QOL items; the overall score is their mean on a 1-7 scale. We prepared a Japanese translation and tested validity and reliability using cross-sectional survey data from 237 adults with SMI in Japan. Concurrent validity was tested in 38 respondents who also completed the WHOQOL26. The sample was randomly split for exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) in separate subsamples. Analyses included score distributions, validity, internal consistency, and domain-level ordinal logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The MANSA items showed the expected associations with the relevant scales and items. Although a two-factor structure was supported by EFA, the CFA fit indices were CFI = 0.86, TLI = 0.82, and RMSEA = 0.12. In the one-factor EFA solution, all factor loadings exceeded 0.40. Cronbach's alpha for all 12 items was 0.877. The schizophrenia-spectrum group had higher scores in several domains than the bipolar- and depressive-disorder groups, and symptom stability was associated with higher scores across all domains.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Japanese version of MANSA showed acceptable concurrent validity and internal consistency. The proposed two-factor structure was not supported; total-score use remained reasonable, but further validation is needed. Diagnosis and symptom stability were associated with domain-specific QOL.</p>","PeriodicalId":20748,"journal":{"name":"Quality of Life Research","volume":"35 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13547167/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality of Life Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-026-04381-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The Manchester Short Assessment of Quality of Life (MANSA) is a quality-of-life (QOL) instrument developed for people with mental illness. This study aimed to develop a Japanese version of the MANSA for people with severe mental illness (SMI) and examine associations between individual MANSA domains and psychiatric diagnosis.

Methods: The MANSA includes 12 self-rated subjective QOL items; the overall score is their mean on a 1-7 scale. We prepared a Japanese translation and tested validity and reliability using cross-sectional survey data from 237 adults with SMI in Japan. Concurrent validity was tested in 38 respondents who also completed the WHOQOL26. The sample was randomly split for exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) in separate subsamples. Analyses included score distributions, validity, internal consistency, and domain-level ordinal logistic regression.

Results: The MANSA items showed the expected associations with the relevant scales and items. Although a two-factor structure was supported by EFA, the CFA fit indices were CFI = 0.86, TLI = 0.82, and RMSEA = 0.12. In the one-factor EFA solution, all factor loadings exceeded 0.40. Cronbach's alpha for all 12 items was 0.877. The schizophrenia-spectrum group had higher scores in several domains than the bipolar- and depressive-disorder groups, and symptom stability was associated with higher scores across all domains.

Conclusions: The Japanese version of MANSA showed acceptable concurrent validity and internal consistency. The proposed two-factor structure was not supported; total-score use remained reasonable, but further validation is needed. Diagnosis and symptom stability were associated with domain-specific QOL.

在自我报告的严重精神疾病患者中开发日本版的曼彻斯特生活质量短期评估(MANSA)。
目的:曼彻斯特生活质量短期评估(MANSA)是一种为精神疾病患者开发的生活质量(QOL)工具。本研究旨在为重度精神疾病(SMI)患者开发日本版本的MANSA,并检查个体MANSA域与精神诊断之间的关系。方法:MANSA包括12个自评主观生活质量项目;总分是他们在1-7分范围内的平均值。我们准备了一份日语翻译,并使用来自日本237名重度精神障碍成人的横断面调查数据来测试效度和信度。对38名同时完成WHOQOL26的受访者进行了并发效度测试。样本随机分割,在不同的子样本中进行探索性因素分析(EFA)和验证性因素分析(CFA)。分析包括得分分布、效度、内部一致性和领域水平有序逻辑回归。结果:MANSA项目与相关量表和项目具有预期的相关性。虽然EFA支持双因素结构,但CFA拟合指数为CFI = 0.86, TLI = 0.82, RMSEA = 0.12。在单因素EFA解决方案中,所有因素的负荷都超过0.40。所有12项的Cronbach's alpha均为0.877。精神分裂症谱系组在几个领域的得分高于双相情感障碍组和抑郁症组,症状稳定性与所有领域的得分都较高相关。结论:日文版MANSA具有良好的并发效度和内部一致性。建议的双因素结构不被支持;总分的使用仍然是合理的,但需要进一步的验证。诊断和症状稳定性与特定领域的生活质量相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Quality of Life Research
Quality of Life Research 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
8.60%
发文量
224
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Quality of Life Research is an international, multidisciplinary journal devoted to the rapid communication of original research, theoretical articles and methodological reports related to the field of quality of life, in all the health sciences. The journal also offers editorials, literature, book and software reviews, correspondence and abstracts of conferences. Quality of life has become a prominent issue in biometry, philosophy, social science, clinical medicine, health services and outcomes research. The journal''s scope reflects the wide application of quality of life assessment and research in the biological and social sciences. All original work is subject to peer review for originality, scientific quality and relevance to a broad readership. This is an official journal of the International Society of Quality of Life Research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书