Verification of optimal pre-enrichment culture inoculum size for tetrathionate broth and selenite broth to isolate Salmonella enterica by spike test and field trial.

IF 0.6 4区 生物学 Q4 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Shiho Oyama, Hiroto Kitamura, Shunta Funada, Jun Hakozaki, Masatoshi Fujihara
{"title":"Verification of optimal pre-enrichment culture inoculum size for tetrathionate broth and selenite broth to isolate Salmonella enterica by spike test and field trial.","authors":"Shiho Oyama, Hiroto Kitamura, Shunta Funada, Jun Hakozaki, Masatoshi Fujihara","doi":"10.2323/jgam.2026.08.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The isolation efficiency of Salmonella enterica using selective enrichment media varies depending on culture conditions. Tetrathionate broth (TTB) and selenite broth (SB) differ in selectivity and growth support, yet practical guidance on optimizing their use remains limited. To identify appropriate conditions for improving recovery, we first conducted a spike test in which a defined amount of S. enterica was added to Salmonella negative cattle feces. TTB showed improved isolation rates when the inoculum size was reduced and the incubation period was extended, indicating that each factor independently contributed to recovery. In contrast, SB exhibited enhanced recovery when a smaller inoculum was combined with an incubation period appropriate for that inoculum size. We then validated these observations using naturally contaminated chicken liver, pig feces, and crow droppings. After pre‑enrichment, samples were inoculated into TTB, SB, modified semi‑solid Rappaport agar for stab culture (MSRAsc), and Rappaport-Vassiliadis broth under various culture conditions. Although results varied among sample types, TTB and SB generally showed improved isolation rates when cultured under the optimized conditions. MSRAsc achieved the highest overall recovery, but some strains, likely sensitive to dyes, failed to grow. These results indicate that although optimizing TTB and SB enhances isolation efficiency, no single medium is sufficient to recover a broad range of serovars. Therefore, a combined approach using dye‑free TTB alongside MSRAsc is recommended, and SB should also be used when strains exhibiting poor growth in other selective media are suspected.</p>","PeriodicalId":15842,"journal":{"name":"Journal of General and Applied Microbiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of General and Applied Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2323/jgam.2026.08.002","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The isolation efficiency of Salmonella enterica using selective enrichment media varies depending on culture conditions. Tetrathionate broth (TTB) and selenite broth (SB) differ in selectivity and growth support, yet practical guidance on optimizing their use remains limited. To identify appropriate conditions for improving recovery, we first conducted a spike test in which a defined amount of S. enterica was added to Salmonella negative cattle feces. TTB showed improved isolation rates when the inoculum size was reduced and the incubation period was extended, indicating that each factor independently contributed to recovery. In contrast, SB exhibited enhanced recovery when a smaller inoculum was combined with an incubation period appropriate for that inoculum size. We then validated these observations using naturally contaminated chicken liver, pig feces, and crow droppings. After pre‑enrichment, samples were inoculated into TTB, SB, modified semi‑solid Rappaport agar for stab culture (MSRAsc), and Rappaport-Vassiliadis broth under various culture conditions. Although results varied among sample types, TTB and SB generally showed improved isolation rates when cultured under the optimized conditions. MSRAsc achieved the highest overall recovery, but some strains, likely sensitive to dyes, failed to grow. These results indicate that although optimizing TTB and SB enhances isolation efficiency, no single medium is sufficient to recover a broad range of serovars. Therefore, a combined approach using dye‑free TTB alongside MSRAsc is recommended, and SB should also be used when strains exhibiting poor growth in other selective media are suspected.

通过刺钉试验和田间试验验证了四硫代酸肉汤和亚硒酸肉汤分离肠炎沙门氏菌的最佳预富集培养接种量。
选择富集培养基对肠炎沙门氏菌的分离效果因培养条件的不同而不同。四硫酸盐肉汤(TTB)和亚硒酸盐肉汤(SB)在选择性和生长支持方面存在差异,但优化其使用的实践指导仍然有限。为了确定提高恢复的适当条件,我们首先进行了一项刺刺试验,在沙门氏菌阴性的牛粪便中添加一定量的肠球菌。随着接种量的减少和孵育时间的延长,TTB的分离率有所提高,这表明每个因素都对恢复有独立的贡献。相比之下,当较小的接种量与相应接种量的潜伏期相结合时,SB表现出增强的恢复。然后,我们用自然污染的鸡肝、猪粪便和乌鸦粪便验证了这些观察结果。预富集后,将样品分别接种于TTB、SB、改性半固态Rappaport琼脂(MSRAsc)和不同培养条件下的Rappaport- vassiliadis肉汤中。虽然不同样品类型的结果有所不同,但在优化条件下,TTB和SB的分离率普遍提高。MSRAsc获得了最高的总回收率,但一些菌株可能对染料敏感,无法生长。这些结果表明,虽然优化TTB和SB可以提高分离效率,但单一培养基不足以恢复广泛的血清型。因此,推荐使用无染料TTB和MSRAsc的联合方法,当怀疑菌株在其他选择性培养基中生长不良时,也应使用SB。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of General and Applied Microbiology
Journal of General and Applied Microbiology 生物-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: JGAM is going to publish scientific reports containing novel and significant microbiological findings, which are mainly devoted to the following categories: Antibiotics and Secondary Metabolites; Biotechnology and Metabolic Engineering; Developmental Microbiology; Environmental Microbiology and Bioremediation; Enzymology; Eukaryotic Microbiology; Evolution and Phylogenetics; Genome Integrity and Plasticity; Microalgae and Photosynthesis; Microbiology for Food; Molecular Genetics; Physiology and Cell Surface; Synthetic and Systems Microbiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书