Agricultural By-Products and Black Soldier Fly Larvae Meal as Alternatives to Soybean Meal in Commercial Broiler Diets: Effects on Meat Quality, Fecal Microbiota, and Environmental Impact.
IF 2.8 3区 农林科学Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Servet Yalçın, Silvia Martinez-Miro, Sezen Özkan, Josefa Madrid, Ana Montalban, Veysel Bay, Muazzez Cömert Acar, Berkay Bozkurt
{"title":"Agricultural By-Products and Black Soldier Fly Larvae Meal as Alternatives to Soybean Meal in Commercial Broiler Diets: Effects on Meat Quality, Fecal Microbiota, and Environmental Impact.","authors":"Servet Yalçın, Silvia Martinez-Miro, Sezen Özkan, Josefa Madrid, Ana Montalban, Veysel Bay, Muazzez Cömert Acar, Berkay Bozkurt","doi":"10.1111/jpn.70109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The present study aimed to evaluate the effect of partially replacing soybean meal with agricultural by-products with or without supplementation of dried black soldier fly larvae (BSFL) meal on meat quality, intestinal microbiota of commercial broiler chickens, and environmental sustainability. A total of 252 day-old Cobb 500 chicks were divided into three dietary treatments, including a corn-soybean-based Control diet and two alternative diets. Alternative diets were a diet in which soybean meal was replaced partly (SPR) by sunflower meal, brewers dried grain, and wheat middlings, and a diet in which BSFL meal was added (5%) to the SPR diet. At 39 days of age, the feces of chickens from each dietary treatment were sampled for fecal microbiota analysis. Birds were slaughtered at day 40 to assess breast meat quality. A life cycle assessment (LCA) was conducted to estimate the environmental impacts of each diet. The SPR and SPR+BSFL diets significantly (p = 0.003) reduced breast meat pH<sub>24</sub> without affecting lightness and yellowness values. While cooking losses were similar in the breast meat of chickens fed the Control and SPR diets, adding BSFL meal to the SPR diet reduced cooking losses (p < 0.001). The SPR+BSFL diet increased total saturated fatty acids (SFA), while the SPR diet elevated polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) content, particularly linoleic acid (p < 0.001). Microbiota analysis revealed a higher abundance of Firmicutes, particularly Lactobacillus and Bacillus, in broilers fed the SPR+BSFL diet, while Clostridiaceae was more prevalent in the SPR group compared to the Control (p < 0.01). These changes in microbiota were likely attributed to the increased fiber content of the diets. Environmental impact analysis showed that both SPR and SPR+BSFL diets reduced global warming potential, damage to ecosystems, human health burden, and resource use compared to the Control diet (p < 0.001). The two alternative diets performed similarly in most environmental indicators. The results suggested that agricultural by-products with or without BSFL meal supplementation could be used to partially replace soybean meal in the diets of commercial broiler chickens and would beneficially modulate gut microbiota and reduce the environmental footprint of broiler production.</p>","PeriodicalId":14942,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jpn.70109","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The present study aimed to evaluate the effect of partially replacing soybean meal with agricultural by-products with or without supplementation of dried black soldier fly larvae (BSFL) meal on meat quality, intestinal microbiota of commercial broiler chickens, and environmental sustainability. A total of 252 day-old Cobb 500 chicks were divided into three dietary treatments, including a corn-soybean-based Control diet and two alternative diets. Alternative diets were a diet in which soybean meal was replaced partly (SPR) by sunflower meal, brewers dried grain, and wheat middlings, and a diet in which BSFL meal was added (5%) to the SPR diet. At 39 days of age, the feces of chickens from each dietary treatment were sampled for fecal microbiota analysis. Birds were slaughtered at day 40 to assess breast meat quality. A life cycle assessment (LCA) was conducted to estimate the environmental impacts of each diet. The SPR and SPR+BSFL diets significantly (p = 0.003) reduced breast meat pH24 without affecting lightness and yellowness values. While cooking losses were similar in the breast meat of chickens fed the Control and SPR diets, adding BSFL meal to the SPR diet reduced cooking losses (p < 0.001). The SPR+BSFL diet increased total saturated fatty acids (SFA), while the SPR diet elevated polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) content, particularly linoleic acid (p < 0.001). Microbiota analysis revealed a higher abundance of Firmicutes, particularly Lactobacillus and Bacillus, in broilers fed the SPR+BSFL diet, while Clostridiaceae was more prevalent in the SPR group compared to the Control (p < 0.01). These changes in microbiota were likely attributed to the increased fiber content of the diets. Environmental impact analysis showed that both SPR and SPR+BSFL diets reduced global warming potential, damage to ecosystems, human health burden, and resource use compared to the Control diet (p < 0.001). The two alternative diets performed similarly in most environmental indicators. The results suggested that agricultural by-products with or without BSFL meal supplementation could be used to partially replace soybean meal in the diets of commercial broiler chickens and would beneficially modulate gut microbiota and reduce the environmental footprint of broiler production.
期刊介绍:
As an international forum for hypothesis-driven scientific research, the Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition publishes original papers in the fields of animal physiology, biochemistry and physiology of nutrition, animal nutrition, feed technology and preservation (only when related to animal nutrition). Well-conducted scientific work that meets the technical and ethical standards is considered only on the basis of scientific rigor.
Research on farm and companion animals is preferred. Comparative work on exotic species is welcome too. Pharmacological or toxicological experiments with a direct reference to nutrition are also considered. Manuscripts on fish and other aquatic non-mammals with topics on growth or nutrition will not be accepted. Manuscripts may be rejected on the grounds that the subject is too specialized or that the contribution they make to animal physiology and nutrition is insufficient.
In addition, reviews on topics of current interest within the scope of the journal are welcome. Authors are advised to send an outline to the Editorial Office for approval prior to submission.