Improving dermatology tele-expertise through physician training: evidence from a large real-world cohort.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY
Cyrus Corrente, Adrien Baudry, Sabine Pedailles
{"title":"Improving dermatology tele-expertise through physician training: evidence from a large real-world cohort.","authors":"Cyrus Corrente, Adrien Baudry, Sabine Pedailles","doi":"10.1684/ejd.2026.5111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Tele-expertise (TE) has emerged as a key strategy to address limited access to dermatological care. However, its performance may depend on the quality of requests submitted by primary care physicians. To evaluate dermatological TE activity in a regional network and to assess the impact of continuing education in dermatology and dermoscopy on the quality and efficiency of TE requests. We conducted a retrospective single-centre study of all TE requests received between January 1, 2022 and December 31, 2024 at the Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal d'Alençon-Mamers using the Omnidoc platform. After standardization, 3,266 TE cases were analysed. Data from TE requests were cross-referenced with patient records when in-person consultation occurred. Request quality and TE performance were compared between trained and untrained general practitioners. General practitioners accounted for 99.2% of TE requests, mainly for diagnostic purposes (92.4%). The most frequent indications were skin cancer screening (59.6%), inflammatory dermatoses (9.7%), and infections (9.5%). TE provided rapid specialist input (median response time: 13 hours), with only 4% of requests rejected due to insufficient information. TE avoided face-to-face consultations in 51% of cases, with high diagnostic concordance (92.4%). Training significantly improved request quality. This resulted in more efficient specialist responses. TE is an effective tool to optimize dermatological care pathways but is highly dependent on the requesting physician's level of training. Integrating structured education in dermatology and dermoscopy transforms TE into a high-performance, learning healthcare model. Investment in training is therefore essential to maximize the clinical impact of TE.</p>","PeriodicalId":11968,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Dermatology","volume":"36 4","pages":"339-344"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1684/ejd.2026.5111","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Tele-expertise (TE) has emerged as a key strategy to address limited access to dermatological care. However, its performance may depend on the quality of requests submitted by primary care physicians. To evaluate dermatological TE activity in a regional network and to assess the impact of continuing education in dermatology and dermoscopy on the quality and efficiency of TE requests. We conducted a retrospective single-centre study of all TE requests received between January 1, 2022 and December 31, 2024 at the Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal d'Alençon-Mamers using the Omnidoc platform. After standardization, 3,266 TE cases were analysed. Data from TE requests were cross-referenced with patient records when in-person consultation occurred. Request quality and TE performance were compared between trained and untrained general practitioners. General practitioners accounted for 99.2% of TE requests, mainly for diagnostic purposes (92.4%). The most frequent indications were skin cancer screening (59.6%), inflammatory dermatoses (9.7%), and infections (9.5%). TE provided rapid specialist input (median response time: 13 hours), with only 4% of requests rejected due to insufficient information. TE avoided face-to-face consultations in 51% of cases, with high diagnostic concordance (92.4%). Training significantly improved request quality. This resulted in more efficient specialist responses. TE is an effective tool to optimize dermatological care pathways but is highly dependent on the requesting physician's level of training. Integrating structured education in dermatology and dermoscopy transforms TE into a high-performance, learning healthcare model. Investment in training is therefore essential to maximize the clinical impact of TE.

通过医生培训提高皮肤科远程专业知识:来自现实世界大型队列的证据。
远程专业技术(TE)已成为解决皮肤病学护理有限问题的一项关键战略。然而,它的表现可能取决于初级保健医生提交的请求的质量。评估区域网络中的皮肤病学TE活动,并评估皮肤病学和皮肤镜继续教育对TE请求的质量和效率的影响。我们使用Omnidoc平台对2022年1月1日至2024年12月31日期间在alenon - mamers社区医院中心收到的所有TE请求进行了回顾性单中心研究。标准化后,对3266例TE病例进行分析。当面对面咨询发生时,TE请求的数据与患者记录交叉引用。对训练有素和未训练有素的全科医生的请求质量和TE绩效进行比较。全科医生的TE请求占99.2%,主要用于诊断目的(92.4%)。最常见的适应症是皮肤癌筛查(59.6%)、炎症性皮肤病(9.7%)和感染(9.5%)。TE提供了快速的专家输入(平均响应时间:13小时),只有4%的请求因信息不足而被拒绝。51%的TE病例避免了面对面咨询,诊断一致性高(92.4%)。培训显著提高了请求质量。这导致了更有效的专家反应。TE是优化皮肤科护理途径的有效工具,但高度依赖于请求医师的培训水平。整合皮肤病学和皮肤镜学的结构化教育将TE转变为高性能,学习型医疗保健模式。因此,对培训的投资对于最大限度地发挥TE的临床影响至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Dermatology
European Journal of Dermatology 医学-皮肤病学
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
4.00%
发文量
129
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Dermatology is an internationally renowned journal for dermatologists and scientists involved in clinical dermatology and skin biology. Original articles on clinical dermatology, skin biology, immunology and cell biology are published, along with review articles, which offer readers a broader view of the available literature. Each issue also has an important correspondence section, which contains brief clinical and investigative reports and letters concerning articles previously published in the EJD. The policy of the EJD is to bring together a large network of specialists from all over the world through a series of editorial offices in France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the USA.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书