Toward Standardization of Laboratory Terminology.

Q2 Medicine
Young Bae Lee Hansen, Fatma Meriç Yilmaz, Gunnar Nordin, Koh Furuta, Madeleen Bosma, Rebecca Ceder, Sridevi Devaraj
{"title":"Toward Standardization of Laboratory Terminology.","authors":"Young Bae Lee Hansen, Fatma Meriç Yilmaz, Gunnar Nordin, Koh Furuta, Madeleen Bosma, Rebecca Ceder, Sridevi Devaraj","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Laboratory medicine is fundamental to evidence-based healthcare, providing critical data on human properties for diagnosing and managing diseases. The increasing complexity and size of laboratory data necessitate robust information technology (IT) systems for efficient management.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This manuscript elucidates the roles and infrastructure requirements of laboratory IT systems by stating the purposes of laboratory medicine and examining the challenges and prerequisites associated with their achievement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We explore the primary purpose of laboratory medicine in supporting clinical decisions and the opportunities for secondary data use. The challenges of data heterogeneity, insufficient and lack of metadata, and the need for standardized terminologies are addressed. We further emphasize the prerequisites including international collaboration and education.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Technological advancements have enabled automation in laboratories, reducing errors, improving quality, and increasing efficiency and capacity for 24/7 sample processing. IT systems facilitate rapid results, enhance resource allocation, and manage the entire testing process from ordering to result interpretation. The establishment of two coherent and comprehensive laboratory information models - one for communication in the laboratory and another for communication between diverse health care providers - is proposed as essential for accurate data exchange and maximizing data utility.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Achieving successful exchange of laboratory results and optimal use of laboratory data hinge on international collaboration, shared resource commitment, and an approach to standardised terminologies and data structures. This work lays the foundation for ongoing efforts to develop international laboratory information models, critical for advancing patient care and leveraging the full potential of laboratory medicine.</p>","PeriodicalId":37192,"journal":{"name":"Electronic Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine","volume":"37 3","pages":"389-395"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13543440/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electronic Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Laboratory medicine is fundamental to evidence-based healthcare, providing critical data on human properties for diagnosing and managing diseases. The increasing complexity and size of laboratory data necessitate robust information technology (IT) systems for efficient management.

Purpose: This manuscript elucidates the roles and infrastructure requirements of laboratory IT systems by stating the purposes of laboratory medicine and examining the challenges and prerequisites associated with their achievement.

Methods: We explore the primary purpose of laboratory medicine in supporting clinical decisions and the opportunities for secondary data use. The challenges of data heterogeneity, insufficient and lack of metadata, and the need for standardized terminologies are addressed. We further emphasize the prerequisites including international collaboration and education.

Results: Technological advancements have enabled automation in laboratories, reducing errors, improving quality, and increasing efficiency and capacity for 24/7 sample processing. IT systems facilitate rapid results, enhance resource allocation, and manage the entire testing process from ordering to result interpretation. The establishment of two coherent and comprehensive laboratory information models - one for communication in the laboratory and another for communication between diverse health care providers - is proposed as essential for accurate data exchange and maximizing data utility.

Conclusion: Achieving successful exchange of laboratory results and optimal use of laboratory data hinge on international collaboration, shared resource commitment, and an approach to standardised terminologies and data structures. This work lays the foundation for ongoing efforts to develop international laboratory information models, critical for advancing patient care and leveraging the full potential of laboratory medicine.

实验室术语标准化研究。
背景:检验医学是基于证据的医疗保健的基础,为诊断和管理疾病提供关于人类属性的关键数据。不断增加的复杂性和实验室数据的规模需要强大的信息技术(IT)系统进行有效的管理。目的:本文阐明了实验室IT系统的作用和基础设施要求,说明了实验室医学的目的,并检查了与他们的成就相关的挑战和先决条件。方法:我们探讨检验医学在支持临床决策和二次数据使用的机会的主要目的。解决了数据异构、元数据不足和缺乏以及对标准化术语的需求等挑战。我们进一步强调国际合作和教育等先决条件。结果:技术进步使实验室自动化,减少了错误,提高了质量,提高了24/7样品处理的效率和能力。IT系统促进快速结果,加强资源分配,并管理从订购到结果解释的整个测试过程。建立两个连贯和全面的实验室信息模型——一个用于实验室内的通信,另一个用于不同卫生保健提供者之间的通信——对于准确的数据交换和最大限度地利用数据至关重要。结论:实现实验室结果的成功交换和实验室数据的最佳使用取决于国际合作、共享资源承诺以及标准化术语和数据结构的方法。这项工作为开发国际实验室信息模型的持续努力奠定了基础,这对于推进患者护理和充分利用实验室医学的潜力至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书