Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Prediction Using Machine Learning: A Comparative Analysis of Classification Algorithms.

Q2 Medicine
Usha Adiga, Vasishta Sampara, Pedda Reddemma P, Supriya P, Sireesha Kanchi, Kasala Farzia
{"title":"Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Prediction Using Machine Learning: A Comparative Analysis of Classification Algorithms.","authors":"Usha Adiga, Vasishta Sampara, Pedda Reddemma P, Supriya P, Sireesha Kanchi, Kasala Farzia","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) represents one of the most prevalent endocrine disorders affecting women of reproductive age, with significant implications for metabolic, reproductive, and psychological health. Early and accurate diagnosis remains challenging due to heterogeneous clinical presentations and the complexity of diagnostic criteria.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to develop and compare multiple machine learning algorithms for predicting PCOS diagnosis, evaluating their performance across various metrics to identify the most effective computational approach for clinical decision support.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive dataset containing clinical, biochemical, and anthropometric parameters from patients was analyzed using twelve different machine learning algorithms. The dataset underwent rigorous preprocessing including missing value imputation, feature engineering, and categorical encoding. Models evaluated included Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machine, K-Nearest Neighbors, Naive Bayes, Decision Tree, Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, XGBoost, AdaBoost, Neural Network, LightGBM, and HistGradientBoosting. Performance was assessed using accuracy, F1-score, sensitivity, specificity, and ROC-AUC scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Gradient Boosting, XGBoost, and HistGradientBoosting demonstrated superior performance with accuracy of 92.66%, while ensemble methods generally outperformed single classifiers. Gradient Boosting achieved the highest F1-score of 87.87% and ROC-AUC of 95.39%. Random Forest exhibited exceptional specificity at 98.63%, while Naive Bayes showed the highest sensitivity of 94.44%. Traditional machine learning approaches like SVM and Neural Networks showed comparatively limited performance in this context.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Machine learning algorithms, particularly gradient boosting methods, demonstrate substantial potential for accurate PCOS prediction and can serve as valuable tools for clinical decision support, potentially enabling earlier intervention and improved patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":37192,"journal":{"name":"Electronic Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine","volume":"37 3","pages":"432-440"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13543484/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electronic Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) represents one of the most prevalent endocrine disorders affecting women of reproductive age, with significant implications for metabolic, reproductive, and psychological health. Early and accurate diagnosis remains challenging due to heterogeneous clinical presentations and the complexity of diagnostic criteria.

Objective: This study aimed to develop and compare multiple machine learning algorithms for predicting PCOS diagnosis, evaluating their performance across various metrics to identify the most effective computational approach for clinical decision support.

Methods: A comprehensive dataset containing clinical, biochemical, and anthropometric parameters from patients was analyzed using twelve different machine learning algorithms. The dataset underwent rigorous preprocessing including missing value imputation, feature engineering, and categorical encoding. Models evaluated included Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machine, K-Nearest Neighbors, Naive Bayes, Decision Tree, Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, XGBoost, AdaBoost, Neural Network, LightGBM, and HistGradientBoosting. Performance was assessed using accuracy, F1-score, sensitivity, specificity, and ROC-AUC scores.

Results: Gradient Boosting, XGBoost, and HistGradientBoosting demonstrated superior performance with accuracy of 92.66%, while ensemble methods generally outperformed single classifiers. Gradient Boosting achieved the highest F1-score of 87.87% and ROC-AUC of 95.39%. Random Forest exhibited exceptional specificity at 98.63%, while Naive Bayes showed the highest sensitivity of 94.44%. Traditional machine learning approaches like SVM and Neural Networks showed comparatively limited performance in this context.

Conclusion: Machine learning algorithms, particularly gradient boosting methods, demonstrate substantial potential for accurate PCOS prediction and can serve as valuable tools for clinical decision support, potentially enabling earlier intervention and improved patient outcomes.

使用机器学习预测多囊卵巢综合征:分类算法的比较分析。
背景:多囊卵巢综合征(PCOS)是影响育龄妇女最常见的内分泌疾病之一,对代谢、生殖和心理健康具有重要影响。由于临床表现的异质性和诊断标准的复杂性,早期和准确的诊断仍然具有挑战性。目的:本研究旨在开发和比较用于预测PCOS诊断的多种机器学习算法,评估其在各种指标上的表现,以确定最有效的临床决策支持计算方法。方法:使用12种不同的机器学习算法对包含临床、生化和人体测量参数的综合数据集进行分析。该数据集经过了严格的预处理,包括缺失值输入、特征工程和分类编码。评估的模型包括逻辑回归、支持向量机、k近邻、朴素贝叶斯、决策树、随机森林、梯度增强、XGBoost、AdaBoost、神经网络、LightGBM和HistGradientBoosting。使用准确性、f1评分、敏感性、特异性和ROC-AUC评分评估疗效。结果:GradientBoosting、XGBoost和HistGradientBoosting的准确率达到92.66%,而集成方法的准确率普遍优于单一分类器。Gradient Boosting的f1得分最高,为87.87%,ROC-AUC最高,为95.39%。随机森林的特异性为98.63%,而朴素贝叶斯的灵敏度最高,为94.44%。传统的机器学习方法,如支持向量机和神经网络,在这种情况下表现相对有限。结论:机器学习算法,特别是梯度增强方法,显示出准确预测PCOS的巨大潜力,可以作为临床决策支持的有价值工具,有可能实现早期干预和改善患者预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书