Hydrophilic versus hydrophobic implant coatings: A comparative osseointegration study.

IF 1.9
Bioinformation Pub Date : 2026-06-30 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.6026/973206300223289
Ravi Ranjan Sinha, Sandeep Kashyap, Gourav Kumar Sahu, Gurdeep Kaur Chauhan, Pragati Mishra, Mayadevi Mayadevi
{"title":"Hydrophilic versus hydrophobic implant coatings: A comparative osseointegration study.","authors":"Ravi Ranjan Sinha, Sandeep Kashyap, Gourav Kumar Sahu, Gurdeep Kaur Chauhan, Pragati Mishra, Mayadevi Mayadevi","doi":"10.6026/973206300223289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Achieving rapid and stable osseointegration remains a persistent challenge in dental implantology, particularly with variations in implant surface properties. Therefore, it is of interest to compare the effects of hydrophilic and hydrophobic implant surface coatings on osseointegration using clinical and radiographic parameters. Hence, a prospective comparative design involving 100 patients showed that hydrophilic implants yielded significantly higher implant stability (ISQ values) and reduced peri-implant bone loss over a 6-month follow-up period. Improved peri-implant soft tissue health, evidenced by reduced probing depth and bleeding on probing, was also observed in the hydrophilic group. Thus, we report hydrophilic surface modification as a superior strategy for enhancing early osseointegration and improving overall implant prognosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":8962,"journal":{"name":"Bioinformation","volume":"22 6","pages":"3289-3293"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13545868/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioinformation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6026/973206300223289","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Achieving rapid and stable osseointegration remains a persistent challenge in dental implantology, particularly with variations in implant surface properties. Therefore, it is of interest to compare the effects of hydrophilic and hydrophobic implant surface coatings on osseointegration using clinical and radiographic parameters. Hence, a prospective comparative design involving 100 patients showed that hydrophilic implants yielded significantly higher implant stability (ISQ values) and reduced peri-implant bone loss over a 6-month follow-up period. Improved peri-implant soft tissue health, evidenced by reduced probing depth and bleeding on probing, was also observed in the hydrophilic group. Thus, we report hydrophilic surface modification as a superior strategy for enhancing early osseointegration and improving overall implant prognosis.

亲水性与疏水性种植体涂层:一项骨整合的比较研究。
实现快速稳定的骨整合仍然是牙科种植学的一个持续挑战,特别是在种植体表面特性的变化。因此,通过临床和影像学参数比较亲水和疏水种植体表面涂层对骨整合的影响是很有意义的。因此,一项涉及100例患者的前瞻性比较设计表明,亲水种植体在6个月的随访期间显著提高了种植体稳定性(ISQ值),并减少了种植体周围的骨质流失。亲水组还观察到种植体周围软组织健康状况的改善,其证据是探探深度减少和探探时出血。因此,我们报道亲水表面修饰是增强早期骨整合和改善种植体整体预后的优越策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bioinformation
Bioinformation MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
128
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书