Thermo-mechanical loading of innovative "Mini-skirt" preparation design versus conventional full-coverage maxillary central incisor preparation design: an in vitro study.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Mohammad Rayyan, Rana Walid Tawil, Dana El Ballouli, Ehab A Farghaly, Radwa Ibrahim Eltahawi, Mohamed B A Badawy, Omar Badran, Omayma Tantawy Said Mohammed, Alaa Mohamed Naguib, Nasser Hussein Shaheen, Mohamed Sayed, Sahar Mokhtar, Mohammed Moustafa Shalaby, Hatem M Ibrahim, Maha Fouad
{"title":"Thermo-mechanical loading of innovative \"Mini-skirt\" preparation design versus conventional full-coverage maxillary central incisor preparation design: an in vitro study.","authors":"Mohammad Rayyan, Rana Walid Tawil, Dana El Ballouli, Ehab A Farghaly, Radwa Ibrahim Eltahawi, Mohamed B A Badawy, Omar Badran, Omayma Tantawy Said Mohammed, Alaa Mohamed Naguib, Nasser Hussein Shaheen, Mohamed Sayed, Sahar Mokhtar, Mohammed Moustafa Shalaby, Hatem M Ibrahim, Maha Fouad","doi":"10.1186/s12903-026-09357-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Conventional full-coverage anterior crown preparations for zirconia often require substantial enamel and dentine reduction and may concentrate palatal-cervical stresses, risking marginal discrepancy and compromised seal. A conservative \"Mini-skirt\" (MS) design that positions the palatal finish line coronally (above the cingulum) could preserve tooth structure and enhance adhesive support, but its thermo-mechanical performance under thermal cycling and fatigue loading remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate whether a conservative MS anterior preparation, with a palatal finish line above the cingulum, improves the thermo-mechanical behavior of generation-5 zirconia crowns compared with a conventional full-coverage (CF) design.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty extracted maxillary central incisors were randomly assigned to MS or CF groups (n = 30). Monolithic 4Y zirconia crowns were CAD/CAM-manufactured, air-abraded and adhesively luted. Specimens were thermocycled 10,000 times between 5 °C and 55 °C, then obliquely loaded at 45° for 1.7 × 10⁶ cycles (50 N, 2 Hz); survivors underwent static fracture testing (0.5 mm·min⁻¹). Marginal gaps were quantified from silicone replicas; failures were classified Grades I-IV (restorable = I-III). Finite-element models (~ 1.3 M elements) reproduced boundary conditions to map stress.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The MS preparation endured thermo-mechanical ageing markedly better than CF: 93.3% (28/30) versus 53.3% (16/30) of crowns completed the fatigue protocol (χ² = 9.01, p = 0.003). Post-fatigue, median fracture load increased from 860 N (IQR 780-930 N) in CF to 1,140 N (1,030-1,260 N) in MS (p < 0.05). Mean marginal gap contracted from 112 ± 21 μm to 67 ± 14 μm (40% reduction, p < 0.001). Restorable fractures predominated in MS (83%) but were minority in CF (37%); catastrophic Grade IV failures fell from 63% to 17% (χ² = 13.6, p < 0.001). Finite-element analysis corroborated the laboratory data, showing a 40% drop in peak palatal-cervical von Mises stress (415 to 250 MPa) and parallel reductions in tensile dentine stress and cement-shear hotspots.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Within the limitations of this in vitro study, the MS preparation showed favorable biomechanical performance under simulated thermo-mechanical loading. These findings provide a preclinical rationale for further investigation of the MS design, although long-term clinical studies are required before definitive clinical recommendations can be made.</p>","PeriodicalId":9072,"journal":{"name":"BMC Oral Health","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13545772/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Oral Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-026-09357-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Conventional full-coverage anterior crown preparations for zirconia often require substantial enamel and dentine reduction and may concentrate palatal-cervical stresses, risking marginal discrepancy and compromised seal. A conservative "Mini-skirt" (MS) design that positions the palatal finish line coronally (above the cingulum) could preserve tooth structure and enhance adhesive support, but its thermo-mechanical performance under thermal cycling and fatigue loading remains unclear.

Purpose: To evaluate whether a conservative MS anterior preparation, with a palatal finish line above the cingulum, improves the thermo-mechanical behavior of generation-5 zirconia crowns compared with a conventional full-coverage (CF) design.

Methods: Sixty extracted maxillary central incisors were randomly assigned to MS or CF groups (n = 30). Monolithic 4Y zirconia crowns were CAD/CAM-manufactured, air-abraded and adhesively luted. Specimens were thermocycled 10,000 times between 5 °C and 55 °C, then obliquely loaded at 45° for 1.7 × 10⁶ cycles (50 N, 2 Hz); survivors underwent static fracture testing (0.5 mm·min⁻¹). Marginal gaps were quantified from silicone replicas; failures were classified Grades I-IV (restorable = I-III). Finite-element models (~ 1.3 M elements) reproduced boundary conditions to map stress.

Results: The MS preparation endured thermo-mechanical ageing markedly better than CF: 93.3% (28/30) versus 53.3% (16/30) of crowns completed the fatigue protocol (χ² = 9.01, p = 0.003). Post-fatigue, median fracture load increased from 860 N (IQR 780-930 N) in CF to 1,140 N (1,030-1,260 N) in MS (p < 0.05). Mean marginal gap contracted from 112 ± 21 μm to 67 ± 14 μm (40% reduction, p < 0.001). Restorable fractures predominated in MS (83%) but were minority in CF (37%); catastrophic Grade IV failures fell from 63% to 17% (χ² = 13.6, p < 0.001). Finite-element analysis corroborated the laboratory data, showing a 40% drop in peak palatal-cervical von Mises stress (415 to 250 MPa) and parallel reductions in tensile dentine stress and cement-shear hotspots.

Conclusions: Within the limitations of this in vitro study, the MS preparation showed favorable biomechanical performance under simulated thermo-mechanical loading. These findings provide a preclinical rationale for further investigation of the MS design, although long-term clinical studies are required before definitive clinical recommendations can be made.

创新“迷你裙”预备设计与传统全覆盖上颌中切牙预备设计的热机械负荷:一项体外研究
背景:传统的全覆盖前牙冠制备氧化锆通常需要大量的牙釉质和牙本质还原,并可能集中腭颈应力,有边缘差异和破坏密封的风险。保守的“迷你裙”(MS)设计将腭终点线置于冠状(带骨上方),可以保护牙齿结构并增强粘接剂支撑,但其在热循环和疲劳载荷下的热机械性能尚不清楚。目的:评估与传统的全覆盖(CF)设计相比,将腭终点线置于带带上方的保守MS前路准备是否能改善第5代氧化锆冠的热力学行为。方法:拔除上颌中切牙60例,随机分为MS组和CF组(n = 30)。整体4Y氧化锆冠是CAD/ cam制造,空气研磨和粘接。在5°C至55°C之间进行10,000次热循环,然后在45°倾斜加载1.7 × 10 26次(50 N, 2 Hz);幸存者进行静态骨折测试(0.5 mm·min⁻¹)。从硅胶复制品中量化边缘间隙;故障分为I-IV级(可恢复= I-III)。有限元模型(约1.3 M个单元)再现边界条件来绘制应力图。结果:MS制备的冠完成疲劳老化的比例为93.3%(28/30)比53.3% (16/30)(χ²= 9.01,p = 0.003),明显优于CF。疲劳后,中位断裂载荷从CF中的860 N (IQR 780-930 N)增加到MS中的1,140 N (1,030-1,260 N) (p)。结论:在体外研究的限制下,MS制剂在模拟热机械载荷下表现出良好的生物力学性能。这些发现为进一步研究MS设计提供了临床前依据,尽管在提出明确的临床建议之前需要进行长期临床研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Oral Health
BMC Oral Health DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
481
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Oral Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of disorders of the mouth, teeth and gums, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书