A comparative study of ultrasound-guided versus landmark-based femoral with sciatic nerve blocks in lower limb surgeries.

IF 1.9
Bioinformation Pub Date : 2026-06-30 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.6026/973206300223457
Ajita Tiwari, Irfan Ahmad Siddiqui, Sushil Chand Verma
{"title":"A comparative study of ultrasound-guided versus landmark-based femoral with sciatic nerve blocks in lower limb surgeries.","authors":"Ajita Tiwari, Irfan Ahmad Siddiqui, Sushil Chand Verma","doi":"10.6026/973206300223457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Peripheral nerve blocks are widely used in lower limb surgeries to provide effective anesthesia and post-operative analgesia. Therefore, it is of interest to compare ultrasound-guided and landmark-based femoral with sciatic nerve block techniques in terms of success rate, onset time, duration of analgesia and complications. A prospective comparative study was conducted on 100 patients undergoing elective lower limb surgeries, divided equally into ultrasound-guided and landmark-based groups. Ultrasound-guided blocks demonstrated significantly faster onset, higher success rates, longer duration of analgesia and fewer complications compared to the landmark-based technique (p < 0.05). Thus, data shows that ultrasound guidance improves the safety, accuracy and overall efficacy of peripheral nerve blocks in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":8962,"journal":{"name":"Bioinformation","volume":"22 6","pages":"3457-3460"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13545912/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioinformation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6026/973206300223457","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Peripheral nerve blocks are widely used in lower limb surgeries to provide effective anesthesia and post-operative analgesia. Therefore, it is of interest to compare ultrasound-guided and landmark-based femoral with sciatic nerve block techniques in terms of success rate, onset time, duration of analgesia and complications. A prospective comparative study was conducted on 100 patients undergoing elective lower limb surgeries, divided equally into ultrasound-guided and landmark-based groups. Ultrasound-guided blocks demonstrated significantly faster onset, higher success rates, longer duration of analgesia and fewer complications compared to the landmark-based technique (p < 0.05). Thus, data shows that ultrasound guidance improves the safety, accuracy and overall efficacy of peripheral nerve blocks in clinical practice.

超声引导与地标性坐骨神经阻滞在下肢手术中的比较研究。
周围神经阻滞广泛应用于下肢手术中,以提供有效的麻醉和术后镇痛。因此,在成功率、起效时间、镇痛持续时间和并发症方面比较超声引导和地标性股骨与坐骨神经阻滞技术是有意义的。对100例选择性下肢手术患者进行前瞻性比较研究,将其平均分为超声引导组和地标组。超声引导阻滞比地标技术起效更快,成功率更高,镇痛持续时间更长,并发症更少(p < 0.05)。由此可见,超声引导在临床实践中提高了周围神经阻滞的安全性、准确性和整体疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bioinformation
Bioinformation MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
128
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书