Comprehensive analysis of synonymous codon usage bias and evolutionary dynamics in the chloroplast genomes of eight Coptis species

IF 4 4区 生物学 Q1 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Shuang Yang, Xiaolei Yu, Yu Chen
{"title":"Comprehensive analysis of synonymous codon usage bias and evolutionary dynamics in the chloroplast genomes of eight Coptis species","authors":"Shuang Yang,&nbsp;Xiaolei Yu,&nbsp;Yu Chen","doi":"10.1007/s10142-026-02035-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><i>Coptis</i> is a medically important genus renowned for producing valuable isoquinoline alkaloids. Although its chloroplast genomes encode key components for photosynthesis and plastid gene expression, the evolutionary constraints acting on their coding sequences and synonymous codon usage remain poorly resolved. Here, we combined a transparent taxon-level sampling strategy with comparative analyses of chloroplast CDSs from eight <i>Coptis</i> taxa. We quantified nucleotide composition, relative synonymous codon usage, effective number of codons, neutrality and PR2 patterns, and correspondence analysis, and then integrated these results with a core-CDS distance analysis and gene-wise pairwise dN/dS estimates. The chloroplast genomes showed a conserved AT-rich composition, especially at the third codon position (GC3 approximately 30.3–30.8%), with a consistent GC1 &gt; GC2 &gt; GC3 trend. Thirty preferred codons were detected, 28 ending in A/T, and eleven optimal codons were shared across the genus. The core-CDS distance analysis recovered a close relationship between <i>C. chinensis</i> and <i>C. chinensis var. brevisepala</i>, whereas most coding genes showed dN/dS values below one, consistent with pervasive purifying constraint. Across 48 consistently filtered CDSs, GC3s was negatively associated with mean dN (Spearman rho = -0.404, <i>P</i> = 0.00439) and CAI was positively associated with mean dN (rho = 0.303, <i>P</i> = 0.0361), whereas the remaining associations were not significant (all P &gt; = 0.0972). These results extend codon-usage analysis by linking synonymous-site composition to coding-sequence evolution within <i>Coptis</i>, while providing a hypothesis-generating resource for future plastid engineering studies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":574,"journal":{"name":"Functional & Integrative Genomics","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Functional & Integrative Genomics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10142-026-02035-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Coptis is a medically important genus renowned for producing valuable isoquinoline alkaloids. Although its chloroplast genomes encode key components for photosynthesis and plastid gene expression, the evolutionary constraints acting on their coding sequences and synonymous codon usage remain poorly resolved. Here, we combined a transparent taxon-level sampling strategy with comparative analyses of chloroplast CDSs from eight Coptis taxa. We quantified nucleotide composition, relative synonymous codon usage, effective number of codons, neutrality and PR2 patterns, and correspondence analysis, and then integrated these results with a core-CDS distance analysis and gene-wise pairwise dN/dS estimates. The chloroplast genomes showed a conserved AT-rich composition, especially at the third codon position (GC3 approximately 30.3–30.8%), with a consistent GC1 > GC2 > GC3 trend. Thirty preferred codons were detected, 28 ending in A/T, and eleven optimal codons were shared across the genus. The core-CDS distance analysis recovered a close relationship between C. chinensis and C. chinensis var. brevisepala, whereas most coding genes showed dN/dS values below one, consistent with pervasive purifying constraint. Across 48 consistently filtered CDSs, GC3s was negatively associated with mean dN (Spearman rho = -0.404, P = 0.00439) and CAI was positively associated with mean dN (rho = 0.303, P = 0.0361), whereas the remaining associations were not significant (all P > = 0.0972). These results extend codon-usage analysis by linking synonymous-site composition to coding-sequence evolution within Coptis, while providing a hypothesis-generating resource for future plastid engineering studies.

8种黄连属植物叶绿体基因组同义密码子使用偏好及进化动态的综合分析。
黄连是一种重要的医学属,以生产有价值的异喹啉生物碱而闻名。尽管其叶绿体基因组编码光合作用和质体基因表达的关键成分,但其编码序列和同义密码子使用的进化限制仍未得到很好的解决。在此,我们将透明的分类级采样策略与8个黄连类群叶绿体cds的比较分析相结合。我们量化了核苷酸组成、相对同义密码子使用、有效密码子数量、中性和PR2模式以及对应分析,然后将这些结果与核心- cds距离分析和基因配对dN/dS估计相结合。叶绿体基因组显示出保守的富含at的组成,特别是在第3个密码子位置(GC3约为30.3-30.8%),GC1 > GC2 > GC3的趋势一致。共检测到30个优选密码子,其中28个以A/T结尾,11个优选密码子在整个属中共享。核心- cds距离分析显示,中国金银花与短叶金银花亲缘关系密切,但多数编码基因的dN/dS值低于1,符合普遍纯化约束。在48个连续过滤的cds中,GC3s与平均dN呈负相关(Spearman rho = -0.404, P = 0.00439), CAI与平均dN呈正相关(rho = 0.303, P = 0.0361),而其余相关性不显著(所有P > = 0.0972)。这些结果通过将同义位点组成与黄连编码序列进化联系起来,扩展了密码子使用分析,同时为未来的质体工程研究提供了假设生成资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
3.40%
发文量
92
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Functional & Integrative Genomics is devoted to large-scale studies of genomes and their functions, including systems analyses of biological processes. The journal will provide the research community an integrated platform where researchers can share, review and discuss their findings on important biological questions that will ultimately enable us to answer the fundamental question: How do genomes work?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书