Estimating the effect of very low nicotine content cigarettes on abstinence by menthol status using novel statistical methods: A reanalysis of a randomized trial in an experimental marketplace with alternative nicotine systems.

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Jack M Wolf, Rachel L Denlinger-Apte, Eric C Donny, Dorothy K Hatsukami, David M Vock, Joseph S Koopmeiners
{"title":"Estimating the effect of very low nicotine content cigarettes on abstinence by menthol status using novel statistical methods: A reanalysis of a randomized trial in an experimental marketplace with alternative nicotine systems.","authors":"Jack M Wolf, Rachel L Denlinger-Apte, Eric C Donny, Dorothy K Hatsukami, David M Vock, Joseph S Koopmeiners","doi":"10.1093/ntr/ntag200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Very low nicotine content (VLNC) cigarettes have been proposed to reduce cigarette consumption. However, previous studies were not adequately powered to analyze the effects of VLNC cigarettes on abstinence, especially within subpopulations (e.g., people who smoke (PWS) menthol cigarettes). Here, we developed and applied two statistical approaches to address these power limitations in analyses stratified by menthol status.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using data from a recent randomized trial of VLNC cigarettes available within an experimental marketplace with alternative nicotine delivery systems (ANDS), we estimated the treatment effect on abstinence stratified by menthol status. Two novel methods leveraged secondary endpoints (total nicotine equivalents, NNAL) to improve efficiency: the multiple endpoint multisource exchangeability model (ME-MEM) and the super learner structural equation model (SL-SEM).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 206 PWS menthol cigarettes, VLNC cigarettes were estimated to increase the probability of abstinence by 11.3 percentage points (95% credible interval: 4.7-19.6) using the ME-MEM and 18.4 percentage points using the SL-SEM (95% confidence interval: 7.7-27.0), increasing precision by 46% and 12%, respectively. For 232 PWS non-menthol cigarettes, the ME-MEM estimated an increase of 10.2 percentage points (95% credible interval: 2.3-17.3) and the SL-SEM estimated an increase of 8.1 percentage points (95% confidence interval: -1.0-13.2), increasing precision by 35% and 99%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In the presence of ANDS, randomization to VLNC cigarettes increases the probability of abstinence for PWS menthol cigarettes and may increase the probability of abstinence for PWS non-menthol cigarettes. Methods that leverage secondary endpoints may improve precision when conventional methods are underpowered.</p>","PeriodicalId":19241,"journal":{"name":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntag200","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Very low nicotine content (VLNC) cigarettes have been proposed to reduce cigarette consumption. However, previous studies were not adequately powered to analyze the effects of VLNC cigarettes on abstinence, especially within subpopulations (e.g., people who smoke (PWS) menthol cigarettes). Here, we developed and applied two statistical approaches to address these power limitations in analyses stratified by menthol status.

Methods: Using data from a recent randomized trial of VLNC cigarettes available within an experimental marketplace with alternative nicotine delivery systems (ANDS), we estimated the treatment effect on abstinence stratified by menthol status. Two novel methods leveraged secondary endpoints (total nicotine equivalents, NNAL) to improve efficiency: the multiple endpoint multisource exchangeability model (ME-MEM) and the super learner structural equation model (SL-SEM).

Results: Among 206 PWS menthol cigarettes, VLNC cigarettes were estimated to increase the probability of abstinence by 11.3 percentage points (95% credible interval: 4.7-19.6) using the ME-MEM and 18.4 percentage points using the SL-SEM (95% confidence interval: 7.7-27.0), increasing precision by 46% and 12%, respectively. For 232 PWS non-menthol cigarettes, the ME-MEM estimated an increase of 10.2 percentage points (95% credible interval: 2.3-17.3) and the SL-SEM estimated an increase of 8.1 percentage points (95% confidence interval: -1.0-13.2), increasing precision by 35% and 99%, respectively.

Conclusions: In the presence of ANDS, randomization to VLNC cigarettes increases the probability of abstinence for PWS menthol cigarettes and may increase the probability of abstinence for PWS non-menthol cigarettes. Methods that leverage secondary endpoints may improve precision when conventional methods are underpowered.

用新颖的统计方法估计极低尼古丁含量香烟的薄荷醇状态对戒断的影响:在实验市场中使用替代尼古丁系统的随机试验的再分析。
导语:极低尼古丁含量(VLNC)香烟已被提出以减少香烟消费。然而,以前的研究没有足够的动力来分析VLNC香烟对戒烟的影响,特别是在亚人群中(例如,吸烟(PWS)薄荷香烟的人)。在这里,我们开发并应用了两种统计方法来解决按薄荷醇状态分层分析中的这些功率限制。方法:利用最近在实验市场上可获得的VLNC香烟的随机试验数据,使用替代尼古丁传递系统(ANDS),我们估计了薄荷醇状态对戒烟的治疗效果。两种利用次级终点(总尼古丁当量,NNAL)来提高效率的新方法:多端点多源交换模型(ME-MEM)和超级学习者结构方程模型(SL-SEM)。结果:在206支PWS薄荷卷烟中,使用ME-MEM估计VLNC卷烟可将戒烟概率提高11.3个百分点(95%可信区间:4.7-19.6),使用SL-SEM(95%可信区间:7.7-27.0)估计可将戒烟概率提高18.4个百分点(95%可信区间:7.7-27.0),精度分别提高46%和12%。对于232支PWS非薄荷香烟,ME-MEM估计增加了10.2个百分点(95%可信区间:2.3-17.3),SL-SEM估计增加了8.1个百分点(95%可信区间:-1.0-13.2),精度分别提高了35%和99%。结论:在ANDS存在的情况下,VLNC香烟的随机化增加了PWS薄荷醇香烟的戒断概率,也可能增加PWS非薄荷醇香烟的戒断概率。当传统方法能力不足时,利用次要端点的方法可以提高精度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
Nicotine & Tobacco Research 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
10.60%
发文量
268
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Nicotine & Tobacco Research is one of the world''s few peer-reviewed journals devoted exclusively to the study of nicotine and tobacco. It aims to provide a forum for empirical findings, critical reviews, and conceptual papers on the many aspects of nicotine and tobacco, including research from the biobehavioral, neurobiological, molecular biologic, epidemiological, prevention, and treatment arenas. Along with manuscripts from each of the areas mentioned above, the editors encourage submissions that are integrative in nature and that cross traditional disciplinary boundaries. The journal is sponsored by the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco (SRNT). It publishes twelve times a year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书