Opioid Use Disorder Outcomes Following Inpatient Opioid Withdrawal Management.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Genie L Bailey, Joshua D Lee, Edward V Nunes, Babak Tofighi, Patricia Novo, Jacquie King, David Liu, Sarah Farkas, Phoebe Gauthier, Anil Thomas, John Rotrosen
{"title":"Opioid Use Disorder Outcomes Following Inpatient Opioid Withdrawal Management.","authors":"Genie L Bailey, Joshua D Lee, Edward V Nunes, Babak Tofighi, Patricia Novo, Jacquie King, David Liu, Sarah Farkas, Phoebe Gauthier, Anil Thomas, John Rotrosen","doi":"10.1097/ADM.0000000000001710","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Medically assisted withdrawal (MAW) for opioid use disorders (OUD) remains common. NIDA's CTN-0051 (X:BOT) trial compared two OUD medications initiated during an acute inpatient MAW admission and continued postdischarge at 8 US sites. This ancillary observational follow-on study explored treatment-as-usual outcomes at 5 X:BOT sites.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adults admitted for OUD were conveniently and consecutively recruited to an 8-week, prospective, observational, noninterventional study targeting up to 300 participants. Withdrawal protocols and medications for OUD (MOUD) followed site usual practices. Baseline and postdischarge weeks 1, 4, and 8 measures were OUD severity, length-of-stay (LOS), urine samples, self-reported MOUD, nonprescribed opioid use, and overdoses. Data analyses were descriptive.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of N = 211 enrolled participants were primarily white men (74%) with daily heroin (87.2%) and intravenous (64.0%) use. About 41.7% (n = 88) reported MOUD treatment at discharge: extended-release naltrexone (n = 39), sublingual buprenorphine-naloxone (n = 38), methadone (n = 8), and oral naltrexone (n = 3). Self-reported MOUD use at week 8 was 28.0%, when 52.6% reported no regular use (<7 consecutive days) and 25.6% reported nonprescribed opioid abstinence. Negative urine rates for nonprescribed opioids ranged from 26.1% to 31.3%. One overdose death and 17 nonfatal opioid-related overdose events occurred in 15 participants.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Return to nonprescribed opioid use, frequent overdose events, one death, and a relative lack of MOUD treatment uptake characterized this usual care cohort following inpatient OUD admissions.</p><p><strong>Scientific significance: </strong>These findings underscore the urgent need for individuals and providers to prioritize linkage to evidence-based MOUD treatments following acute inpatient OUD-related admissions, given high rates of return to opioid use and overdose events.</p>","PeriodicalId":14744,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Addiction Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Addiction Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ADM.0000000000001710","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Medically assisted withdrawal (MAW) for opioid use disorders (OUD) remains common. NIDA's CTN-0051 (X:BOT) trial compared two OUD medications initiated during an acute inpatient MAW admission and continued postdischarge at 8 US sites. This ancillary observational follow-on study explored treatment-as-usual outcomes at 5 X:BOT sites.

Methods: Adults admitted for OUD were conveniently and consecutively recruited to an 8-week, prospective, observational, noninterventional study targeting up to 300 participants. Withdrawal protocols and medications for OUD (MOUD) followed site usual practices. Baseline and postdischarge weeks 1, 4, and 8 measures were OUD severity, length-of-stay (LOS), urine samples, self-reported MOUD, nonprescribed opioid use, and overdoses. Data analyses were descriptive.

Results: A total of N = 211 enrolled participants were primarily white men (74%) with daily heroin (87.2%) and intravenous (64.0%) use. About 41.7% (n = 88) reported MOUD treatment at discharge: extended-release naltrexone (n = 39), sublingual buprenorphine-naloxone (n = 38), methadone (n = 8), and oral naltrexone (n = 3). Self-reported MOUD use at week 8 was 28.0%, when 52.6% reported no regular use (<7 consecutive days) and 25.6% reported nonprescribed opioid abstinence. Negative urine rates for nonprescribed opioids ranged from 26.1% to 31.3%. One overdose death and 17 nonfatal opioid-related overdose events occurred in 15 participants.

Conclusions: Return to nonprescribed opioid use, frequent overdose events, one death, and a relative lack of MOUD treatment uptake characterized this usual care cohort following inpatient OUD admissions.

Scientific significance: These findings underscore the urgent need for individuals and providers to prioritize linkage to evidence-based MOUD treatments following acute inpatient OUD-related admissions, given high rates of return to opioid use and overdose events.

住院患者阿片类药物戒断管理后阿片类药物使用障碍的结果。
目的:阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)的医学辅助戒断(MAW)仍然很常见。NIDA的CTN-0051 (X:BOT)试验比较了在美国8个医院急性住院MAW住院期间开始和出院后继续使用的两种OUD药物。这项辅助观察性随访研究探讨了5个BOT部位的常规治疗结果。方法:方便且连续地招募患有OUD的成年人参加一项为期8周的前瞻性、观察性、非干预性研究,目标是多达300名参与者。OUD (mod)的戒断方案和药物治疗遵循现场惯例。基线和出院后第1,4和8周的测量是OUD严重程度,住院时间(LOS),尿液样本,自我报告的mod,非处方阿片类药物使用和过量。数据分析是描述性的。结果:共有211名参与者,主要是白人男性(74%),每日使用海洛因(87.2%)和静脉注射(64.0%)。约41.7% (n = 88)的患者在出院时接受了mod治疗:缓释纳曲酮(n = 39)、丁丙诺啡-纳洛酮舌下(n = 38)、美沙酮(n = 8)和口服纳曲酮(n = 3)。第8周自我报告的使用mod的比例为28.0%,而52.6%的人报告没有经常使用(结论:重新使用非处方阿片类药物、频繁的过量事件、1例死亡和相对缺乏mod治疗的特点是住院OUD患者入院后的常规护理队列。科学意义:这些发现强调,鉴于阿片类药物使用和过量事件的高复发率,个人和提供者迫切需要在急性住院患者与oud相关的入院后优先考虑以证据为基础的mod治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Addiction Medicine
Journal of Addiction Medicine 医学-药物滥用
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
260
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of Journal of Addiction Medicine, the official peer-reviewed journal of the American Society of Addiction Medicine, is to promote excellence in the practice of addiction medicine and in clinical research as well as to support Addiction Medicine as a mainstream medical sub-specialty. Under the guidance of an esteemed Editorial Board, peer-reviewed articles published in the Journal focus on developments in addiction medicine as well as on treatment innovations and ethical, economic, forensic, and social topics including: •addiction and substance use in pregnancy •adolescent addiction and at-risk use •the drug-exposed neonate •pharmacology •all psychoactive substances relevant to addiction, including alcohol, nicotine, caffeine, marijuana, opioids, stimulants and other prescription and illicit substances •diagnosis •neuroimaging techniques •treatment of special populations •treatment, early intervention and prevention of alcohol and drug use disorders •methodological issues in addiction research •pain and addiction, prescription drug use disorder •co-occurring addiction, medical and psychiatric disorders •pathological gambling disorder, sexual and other behavioral addictions •pathophysiology of addiction •behavioral and pharmacological treatments •issues in graduate medical education •recovery •health services delivery •ethical, legal and liability issues in addiction medicine practice •drug testing •self- and mutual-help.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书