Feasibility and Operator-Reported Utility of Transesophageal Lung Ultrasound As an Adjunct to Resuscitative Transesophageal Echocardiography in the Evaluation of Shock: A Multicenter Observational Study.
Vladyslav Dieiev, Pedro D Salinas, Felipe Teran, Clark G Owyang, Dylan Rupska, Aniruddh Kapoor, Zubair Siddiqui, Daniel Strama, Cindy Ndiaye, Nathaniel A Sands, Aarthi Kaviyarasu, Katharine M Burns
{"title":"Feasibility and Operator-Reported Utility of Transesophageal Lung Ultrasound As an Adjunct to Resuscitative Transesophageal Echocardiography in the Evaluation of Shock: A Multicenter Observational Study.","authors":"Vladyslav Dieiev, Pedro D Salinas, Felipe Teran, Clark G Owyang, Dylan Rupska, Aniruddh Kapoor, Zubair Siddiqui, Daniel Strama, Cindy Ndiaye, Nathaniel A Sands, Aarthi Kaviyarasu, Katharine M Burns","doi":"10.1097/CCM.0000000000007337","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To describe the utilization, feasibility, and operator-reported diagnostic and management impact of transesophageal lung ultrasound (TELUS) integrated into resuscitative transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) for the assessment of mechanically ventilated adults with shock.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Multicenter observational cohort study using prospectively collected data.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Twenty-three hospitals from the Resuscitative Transesophageal Echocardiography Collaborative Registry (rTEECoRe) network.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>From 1213 registry TEE examinations, 379 met the inclusion criteria for shock evaluation or hemodynamic monitoring in mechanically ventilated adults; 96 (25.3%) of these included TELUS.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>TELUS integration was associated with significantly higher operator-reported identification of shock etiology compared with resuscitative TEE alone (86.5% vs. 75.3%; odds ratio [OR], 1.95; 95% CI, 1.02-3.72; p = 0.04). Although overall clinical management changes were more frequently reported in the TELUS group, this difference did not reach statistical significance (78.1% vs. 71.7%; OR, 1.40; 95% CI, 0.82-2.41; p = 0.22). TELUS examinations were associated with longer procedure duration (median 21.5 vs.19.0 min; p = 0.01) and were predominantly performed by intensivists. Pulmonary findings, including B-lines, pleural effusions, consolidations, and A-line patterns, varied in frequency and were occasionally associated with specific respiratory or antimicrobial interventions. Procedure-related complications were rare and similar between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this multicenter cohort of mechanically ventilated adults with shock, adding TELUS to resuscitative TEE was associated with a higher rate of operator-reported identification of shock etiology and was feasible with minimal additional procedure time. Prospective studies with standardized TELUS acquisition and interpretation, independent adjudication, and evaluation of patient-centered outcomes are needed to define clinical scenarios of incremental value.</p>","PeriodicalId":10765,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000007337","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: To describe the utilization, feasibility, and operator-reported diagnostic and management impact of transesophageal lung ultrasound (TELUS) integrated into resuscitative transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) for the assessment of mechanically ventilated adults with shock.
Design: Multicenter observational cohort study using prospectively collected data.
Setting: Twenty-three hospitals from the Resuscitative Transesophageal Echocardiography Collaborative Registry (rTEECoRe) network.
Patients: From 1213 registry TEE examinations, 379 met the inclusion criteria for shock evaluation or hemodynamic monitoring in mechanically ventilated adults; 96 (25.3%) of these included TELUS.
Interventions: None.
Measurements and main results: TELUS integration was associated with significantly higher operator-reported identification of shock etiology compared with resuscitative TEE alone (86.5% vs. 75.3%; odds ratio [OR], 1.95; 95% CI, 1.02-3.72; p = 0.04). Although overall clinical management changes were more frequently reported in the TELUS group, this difference did not reach statistical significance (78.1% vs. 71.7%; OR, 1.40; 95% CI, 0.82-2.41; p = 0.22). TELUS examinations were associated with longer procedure duration (median 21.5 vs.19.0 min; p = 0.01) and were predominantly performed by intensivists. Pulmonary findings, including B-lines, pleural effusions, consolidations, and A-line patterns, varied in frequency and were occasionally associated with specific respiratory or antimicrobial interventions. Procedure-related complications were rare and similar between groups.
Conclusions: In this multicenter cohort of mechanically ventilated adults with shock, adding TELUS to resuscitative TEE was associated with a higher rate of operator-reported identification of shock etiology and was feasible with minimal additional procedure time. Prospective studies with standardized TELUS acquisition and interpretation, independent adjudication, and evaluation of patient-centered outcomes are needed to define clinical scenarios of incremental value.
目的:描述经食管肺超声(TELUS)与复苏性经食管超声心动图(TEE)结合用于评估机械通气成人休克的应用、可行性和手术报告的诊断和管理影响。设计:采用前瞻性收集数据的多中心观察队列研究。背景:来自复苏经食管超声心动图协同注册(rTEECoRe)网络的23家医院。患者:从1213例登记TEE检查中,379例符合机械通气成人休克评估或血流动力学监测的纳入标准;其中96例(25.3%)包括TELUS。干预措施:没有。测量结果和主要结果:与单独使用复苏TEE相比,TELUS整合与操作员报告的休克病因鉴定相关(86.5% vs. 75.3%;优势比[OR], 1.95; 95% CI, 1.02-3.72; p = 0.04)。尽管TELUS组总体临床管理改变的报道频率更高,但这种差异没有达到统计学意义(78.1% vs. 71.7%; OR, 1.40; 95% CI, 0.82-2.41; p = 0.22)。TELUS检查与较长的手术时间相关(中位数21.5 vs.19.0 min; p = 0.01),主要由强化医师进行。肺部表现,包括b线、胸腔积液、实变和a线模式,频率各不相同,偶尔与特定的呼吸或抗菌干预有关。手术相关并发症很少,两组间相似。结论:在这个多中心的机械通气成人休克队列中,在复苏TEE中加入TELUS与操作员报告的较高的休克病因鉴定率相关,并且在最小的额外手术时间内是可行的。需要标准化的TELUS获取和解释、独立裁决和以患者为中心的结果评估的前瞻性研究来定义具有增量价值的临床场景。
期刊介绍:
Critical Care Medicine is the premier peer-reviewed, scientific publication in critical care medicine. Directed to those specialists who treat patients in the ICU and CCU, including chest physicians, surgeons, pediatricians, pharmacists/pharmacologists, anesthesiologists, critical care nurses, and other healthcare professionals, Critical Care Medicine covers all aspects of acute and emergency care for the critically ill or injured patient.
Each issue presents critical care practitioners with clinical breakthroughs that lead to better patient care, the latest news on promising research, and advances in equipment and techniques.