Quality by Design for Bilayer Tablets: Integrating Formulation, Manufacturing, and Process Analytical Technology.

IF 5.1 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Joao D Simão, António J Ribeiro
{"title":"Quality by Design for Bilayer Tablets: Integrating Formulation, Manufacturing, and Process Analytical Technology.","authors":"Joao D Simão, António J Ribeiro","doi":"10.1208/s12249-026-03535-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Bilayer fixed-dose combination tablets are increasingly used to improve adherence and tailor drug-release profiles, but their development remains challenging because multiple interacting formulation and process variables strongly affect product performance. Quality by Design (QbD) offers a systematic framework to address these challenges, yet its implementation for bilayer tablets and associated analytical methods remains fragmented. In this review we map and critically analyze published applications of QbD to the formulation design, manufacturing process, and testing of bilayer tablets. Using the available literature and regulatory guidance, we summarize the rationale for bilayer formulations, the experimental designs employed, the RA tools used, and the main critical material attributes (CMAs), critical process parameters (CPPs), and critical quality attributes (CQAs) identified. Particular emphasis is placed on the use of design of experiments, process analytical technology, and multivariate data analysis to understand and control mechanical properties, interfacial adhesion, and drug-release behavior, as well as on the current status of analytical QbD for bilayer products. Overall, the evidence shows that QbD has improved control of drug release and interfacial strength and supported the scale-up of bilayer manufacturing, but prior risk analysis, robust control strategies, and Analytical Quality by Design (AQbD)-based dissolution and stability methods are still inconsistently implemented. The concepts and design principles summarized here are expected to support more rational, regulatory-aligned development of bilayer tablets and to guide future QbD applications in this field.</p>","PeriodicalId":6925,"journal":{"name":"AAPS PharmSciTech","volume":"27 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AAPS PharmSciTech","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1208/s12249-026-03535-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bilayer fixed-dose combination tablets are increasingly used to improve adherence and tailor drug-release profiles, but their development remains challenging because multiple interacting formulation and process variables strongly affect product performance. Quality by Design (QbD) offers a systematic framework to address these challenges, yet its implementation for bilayer tablets and associated analytical methods remains fragmented. In this review we map and critically analyze published applications of QbD to the formulation design, manufacturing process, and testing of bilayer tablets. Using the available literature and regulatory guidance, we summarize the rationale for bilayer formulations, the experimental designs employed, the RA tools used, and the main critical material attributes (CMAs), critical process parameters (CPPs), and critical quality attributes (CQAs) identified. Particular emphasis is placed on the use of design of experiments, process analytical technology, and multivariate data analysis to understand and control mechanical properties, interfacial adhesion, and drug-release behavior, as well as on the current status of analytical QbD for bilayer products. Overall, the evidence shows that QbD has improved control of drug release and interfacial strength and supported the scale-up of bilayer manufacturing, but prior risk analysis, robust control strategies, and Analytical Quality by Design (AQbD)-based dissolution and stability methods are still inconsistently implemented. The concepts and design principles summarized here are expected to support more rational, regulatory-aligned development of bilayer tablets and to guide future QbD applications in this field.

双层片剂的质量设计:综合处方、生产和工艺分析技术。
双层固定剂量联合片剂越来越多地用于改善依从性和定制药物释放特征,但其开发仍然具有挑战性,因为多种相互作用的配方和工艺变量强烈影响产品性能。质量设计(QbD)提供了一个系统的框架来解决这些挑战,但其对双层片剂和相关分析方法的实施仍然是碎片化的。在这篇综述中,我们绘制并批判性地分析了已发表的QbD在双层片剂的配方设计、制造过程和测试中的应用。利用现有文献和监管指南,我们总结了双层配方的基本原理,采用的实验设计,使用的RA工具,以及确定的主要关键材料属性(cma),关键工艺参数(CPPs)和关键质量属性(cqa)。特别强调的是实验设计、过程分析技术和多元数据分析的使用,以理解和控制机械性能、界面粘附和药物释放行为,以及双层产品的分析QbD的现状。总体而言,有证据表明QbD改善了药物释放和界面强度的控制,并支持了双层制造的规模扩大,但先前的风险分析、稳健的控制策略和基于分析质量设计(AQbD)的溶出度和稳定性方法仍然没有得到一致的实施。这里总结的概念和设计原则有望支持更合理、更符合法规的双层片剂开发,并指导该领域未来的QbD应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
AAPS PharmSciTech
AAPS PharmSciTech 医学-药学
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
3.00%
发文量
264
审稿时长
2.4 months
期刊介绍: AAPS PharmSciTech is a peer-reviewed, online-only journal committed to serving those pharmaceutical scientists and engineers interested in the research, development, and evaluation of pharmaceutical dosage forms and delivery systems, including drugs derived from biotechnology and the manufacturing science pertaining to the commercialization of such dosage forms. Because of its electronic nature, AAPS PharmSciTech aspires to utilize evolving electronic technology to enable faster and diverse mechanisms of information delivery to its readership. Submission of uninvited expert reviews and research articles are welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书