Roads to Recovery Capital: Associations Between Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Recovery Capital Among Individuals with Opioid Use Disorder.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Journal of Dual Diagnosis Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2026-09-03 DOI:10.1080/15504263.2026.2720397
Noam G Newberger, Jewelia J Ferguson, Alana Egan, Dominique N Sheldon, Natalie T Chasten, Ben A Seebold, Alyssa L Avila, Josiah D Rich, Nicole H Weiss
{"title":"Roads to Recovery Capital: Associations Between Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Recovery Capital Among Individuals with Opioid Use Disorder.","authors":"Noam G Newberger, Jewelia J Ferguson, Alana Egan, Dominique N Sheldon, Natalie T Chasten, Ben A Seebold, Alyssa L Avila, Josiah D Rich, Nicole H Weiss","doi":"10.1080/15504263.2026.2720397","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is highly comorbid with opioid use disorder (OUD) and associated with poorer substance use outcomes, including more severe patterns of substance use, poorer psychosocial functioning, and greater risk of overdose. Recovery capital, or internal and external resources that may be drawn from to initiate and sustain recovery from substance use, has been linked to OUD treatment engagement and long-term recovery outcomes, such as reduced substance use and improved quality of life; however, there is limited research on the association between PTSD and recovery capital. Individual differences in motivation for OUD treatment affect treatment engagement and outcomes and may influence the association between PTSD symptoms and recovery capital. <b>Results:</b> Addressing critical gaps in the literature, the current study used a path analysis model to explicate the pathway from PTSD to recovery capital and assess the potential intermediary role of treatment motivation. Participants were 115 individuals currently in residential substance use treatment (<i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 38.18 years; 70.4% white). <b>Results:</b> The overall path model demonstrated good fit (χ<sup>2</sup>[20] = 25.55; <i>p</i> = 0.18; RMSEA = 0.06 [90% CI: 0.00-0.12]; CFI = 0.94, TLI = 0.89). PTSD was negatively associated with recovery capital (<i>B</i> = -0.43, <i>p</i> = 0.030), but this association was not explained by treatment motivation (<i>B</i> = 0.13, <i>p</i> = 0.342). <b>Discussion:</b> Future research is needed to further identify the mechanisms by which PTSD influences recovery capital. Such studies may inform treatment and recovery outcomes for individuals with comorbid PTSD and OUD.</p>","PeriodicalId":46571,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dual Diagnosis","volume":" ","pages":"373-383"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dual Diagnosis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15504263.2026.2720397","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is highly comorbid with opioid use disorder (OUD) and associated with poorer substance use outcomes, including more severe patterns of substance use, poorer psychosocial functioning, and greater risk of overdose. Recovery capital, or internal and external resources that may be drawn from to initiate and sustain recovery from substance use, has been linked to OUD treatment engagement and long-term recovery outcomes, such as reduced substance use and improved quality of life; however, there is limited research on the association between PTSD and recovery capital. Individual differences in motivation for OUD treatment affect treatment engagement and outcomes and may influence the association between PTSD symptoms and recovery capital. Results: Addressing critical gaps in the literature, the current study used a path analysis model to explicate the pathway from PTSD to recovery capital and assess the potential intermediary role of treatment motivation. Participants were 115 individuals currently in residential substance use treatment (Mage = 38.18 years; 70.4% white). Results: The overall path model demonstrated good fit (χ2[20] = 25.55; p = 0.18; RMSEA = 0.06 [90% CI: 0.00-0.12]; CFI = 0.94, TLI = 0.89). PTSD was negatively associated with recovery capital (B = -0.43, p = 0.030), but this association was not explained by treatment motivation (B = 0.13, p = 0.342). Discussion: Future research is needed to further identify the mechanisms by which PTSD influences recovery capital. Such studies may inform treatment and recovery outcomes for individuals with comorbid PTSD and OUD.

恢复资本之路:阿片类药物使用障碍患者创伤后应激障碍与恢复资本之间的关系。
简介:创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)与阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)高度共病,并与较差的物质使用结果相关,包括更严重的物质使用模式、较差的社会心理功能和更大的过量风险。恢复资本,或可用于启动和维持物质使用恢复的内部和外部资源,与OUD治疗参与和长期恢复结果(如减少物质使用和提高生活质量)有关;然而,关于创伤后应激障碍与恢复资本之间关系的研究有限。OUD治疗动机的个体差异影响治疗投入和结果,并可能影响PTSD症状与恢复资本之间的关联。结果:针对文献中的关键空白,本研究使用路径分析模型来解释PTSD到恢复资本的路径,并评估治疗动机的潜在中介作用。参与者为115名目前正在接受住宅药物使用治疗的个体(年龄38.18岁,白人占70.4%)。结果:整体路径模型拟合良好(χ2[20] = 25.55; p = 0.18; RMSEA = 0.06 [90% CI: 0.00-0.12]; CFI = 0.94, TLI = 0.89)。PTSD与恢复资本呈负相关(B = -0.43, p = 0.030),但这种关联不能用治疗动机来解释(B = 0.13, p = 0.342)。讨论:未来的研究需要进一步确定创伤后应激障碍影响恢复资本的机制。这些研究可能为PTSD和OUD合并症患者的治疗和康复结果提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
13.60%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: Journal of Dual Diagnosis is a quarterly, international publication that focuses on the full spectrum of complexities regarding dual diagnosis. The co-occurrence of mental health and substance use disorders, or “dual diagnosis,” is one of the quintessential issues in behavioral health. Why do such high rates of co-occurrence exist? What does it tell us about risk profiles? How do these linked disorders affect people, their families, and the communities in which they live? What are the natural paths to recovery? What specific treatments are most helpful and how can new ones be developed? How can we enhance the implementation of evidence-based practices at clinical, administrative, and policy levels? How can we help clients to learn active recovery skills and adopt needed supports, clinicians to master new interventions, programs to implement effective services, and communities to foster healthy adjustment? The Journal addresses each of these perplexing challenges.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书