{"title":"Follow-up after an abnormal screening mammogram: Impact of a pandemic on mobile mammography patients.","authors":"Ethan Oren Cohen, Charisma DeSai, Chingyi Young, Jia Sun, Gary J Whitman","doi":"10.25259/JCIS_238_2025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the effect of COVID-19 on a mobile screening mammography program as measured by turnaround time (TAT) in days between an abnormal screening mammogram (sMG) and diagnostic mammography.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>All of our institution's sMG (mobile and non-mobile) from January 2017, to December 2022 were retrospectively reviewed, and those dated March 7, 2020-July 7, 2020 were excluded because our mobile sMG program was non-operative at that time due to COVID-19. TATs and patient demographics were compared for mobile and non-mobile sMG patients between 2 time periods: Pre-pandemic (January 1, 2017-March 6, 2020) and pandemic (July 8, 2020-December 31, 2022). Statistics included multiple linear regression analysis, Fisher's Exact, and Wilcoxon Rank Sum tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the pre-pandemic period, 11,439 female patients (9309 without insurance, 81.3%) underwent 14,161 mobile sMG, while 28,737 female patients (429 without insurance, 1.5%) underwent 57,840 non-mobile sMG. During the pandemic period, 6805 female patients (6720 without insurance, 98.8%) underwent 7663 mobile sMG, while 32,655 female patients (868 without insurance, 2.7%) underwent 53,540 non-mobile sMG. Median TATs for mobile uninsured patients increased from 41 days during the pre-pandemic period to 51 days during the pandemic period (<i>p</i> < 0.001), while median TATs for non-mobile insured patients decreased from 20 days during the pre-pandemic period to 14 days during the pandemic period (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Increased TATs were associated with Asian, African American, and Other race compared with White race (Asian, <i>p</i> = 0.004; African American, <i>p</i> < 0.001; and Other, <i>p</i> = 0.02) and self-pay insurance status (<i>p</i> = 0.006).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For mobile uninsured screening patients, the number of days between screening and diagnostic mammography increased with the COVID-19 pandemic, while it decreased for non-mobile insured screening patients. Mobile uninsured mammography patients may represent a population that needs additional attention. These findings highlight a health equity concern, as the pandemic disproportionately widened disparities in timely follow-up care for uninsured patients served by mobile mammography programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":15512,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Imaging Science","volume":"16 ","pages":"31"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13540775/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Imaging Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/JCIS_238_2025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the effect of COVID-19 on a mobile screening mammography program as measured by turnaround time (TAT) in days between an abnormal screening mammogram (sMG) and diagnostic mammography.
Material and methods: All of our institution's sMG (mobile and non-mobile) from January 2017, to December 2022 were retrospectively reviewed, and those dated March 7, 2020-July 7, 2020 were excluded because our mobile sMG program was non-operative at that time due to COVID-19. TATs and patient demographics were compared for mobile and non-mobile sMG patients between 2 time periods: Pre-pandemic (January 1, 2017-March 6, 2020) and pandemic (July 8, 2020-December 31, 2022). Statistics included multiple linear regression analysis, Fisher's Exact, and Wilcoxon Rank Sum tests.
Results: During the pre-pandemic period, 11,439 female patients (9309 without insurance, 81.3%) underwent 14,161 mobile sMG, while 28,737 female patients (429 without insurance, 1.5%) underwent 57,840 non-mobile sMG. During the pandemic period, 6805 female patients (6720 without insurance, 98.8%) underwent 7663 mobile sMG, while 32,655 female patients (868 without insurance, 2.7%) underwent 53,540 non-mobile sMG. Median TATs for mobile uninsured patients increased from 41 days during the pre-pandemic period to 51 days during the pandemic period (p < 0.001), while median TATs for non-mobile insured patients decreased from 20 days during the pre-pandemic period to 14 days during the pandemic period (p < 0.001). Increased TATs were associated with Asian, African American, and Other race compared with White race (Asian, p = 0.004; African American, p < 0.001; and Other, p = 0.02) and self-pay insurance status (p = 0.006).
Conclusion: For mobile uninsured screening patients, the number of days between screening and diagnostic mammography increased with the COVID-19 pandemic, while it decreased for non-mobile insured screening patients. Mobile uninsured mammography patients may represent a population that needs additional attention. These findings highlight a health equity concern, as the pandemic disproportionately widened disparities in timely follow-up care for uninsured patients served by mobile mammography programs.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Clinical Imaging Science (JCIS) is an open access peer-reviewed journal committed to publishing high-quality articles in the field of Imaging Science. The journal aims to present Imaging Science and relevant clinical information in an understandable and useful format. The journal is owned and published by the Scientific Scholar. Audience Our audience includes Radiologists, Researchers, Clinicians, medical professionals and students. Review process JCIS has a highly rigorous peer-review process that makes sure that manuscripts are scientifically accurate, relevant, novel and important. Authors disclose all conflicts, affiliations and financial associations such that the published content is not biased.