Switchback from biosimilar tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors to reference medicines: a review.

IF 4 3区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
Expert Review of Clinical Immunology Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-09-24 DOI:10.1080/1744666X.2026.2727537
Robert Moots, Sascha Gerdes, Giampiero Girolomoni, Jonas Halfvarson, Charlotte Both, Ines Brückmann, Silvio Danese
{"title":"Switchback from biosimilar tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors to reference medicines: a review.","authors":"Robert Moots, Sascha Gerdes, Giampiero Girolomoni, Jonas Halfvarson, Charlotte Both, Ines Brückmann, Silvio Danese","doi":"10.1080/1744666X.2026.2727537","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Switching from reference biologics to biosimilars usually occurs for non-medical reasons, such as cost-driven formulary changes. However, despite biosimilars having the same efficacy and similar safety profiles as their reference products, some patients discontinue treatment and 'switchback' to the reference product.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>In this narrative review, the authors examine the frequency and causes of switchback reported in journal articles and congress abstracts published between 2016 and 2023, evaluating patients who switched from biosimilars back to the reference biologic. As almost all publications focused on tumor necrosis factor inhibitors, and so the authors restricted their analysis to this drug class.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Evidence suggests that switchback rates are low, with most studies of at least 100 patients reporting rates of less than 20%. The main reasons for switchback are typically patient-reported loss of effectiveness (usually judged subjectively) and side effects. These findings support the view that the nocebo ('negative placebo') effect is a plausible and likely contributor to switchback. Healthcare professional and patient education on the effectiveness and safety of biosimilars is needed and will be vital to counter misinformation and minimize the nocebo effect, allowing biosimilars to continue contributing to sustainability in healthcare.</p>","PeriodicalId":12175,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Clinical Immunology","volume":" ","pages":"975-988"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Clinical Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1744666X.2026.2727537","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Switching from reference biologics to biosimilars usually occurs for non-medical reasons, such as cost-driven formulary changes. However, despite biosimilars having the same efficacy and similar safety profiles as their reference products, some patients discontinue treatment and 'switchback' to the reference product.

Areas covered: In this narrative review, the authors examine the frequency and causes of switchback reported in journal articles and congress abstracts published between 2016 and 2023, evaluating patients who switched from biosimilars back to the reference biologic. As almost all publications focused on tumor necrosis factor inhibitors, and so the authors restricted their analysis to this drug class.

Expert opinion: Evidence suggests that switchback rates are low, with most studies of at least 100 patients reporting rates of less than 20%. The main reasons for switchback are typically patient-reported loss of effectiveness (usually judged subjectively) and side effects. These findings support the view that the nocebo ('negative placebo') effect is a plausible and likely contributor to switchback. Healthcare professional and patient education on the effectiveness and safety of biosimilars is needed and will be vital to counter misinformation and minimize the nocebo effect, allowing biosimilars to continue contributing to sustainability in healthcare.

从肿瘤坏死因子- α抑制剂生物仿制药转向参考药物:综述
从参考生物制剂转向生物仿制药通常是出于非医疗原因,如成本驱动的处方变更。然而,尽管生物仿制药具有与其参考产品相同的疗效和相似的安全性,但一些患者停止治疗并“切换”到参考产品。涵盖领域:在这篇叙述性综述中,作者研究了2016年至2023年期间发表的期刊文章和国会摘要中报告的切换频率和原因,评估了从生物仿制药切换回参考生物制剂的患者。由于几乎所有的出版物都集中在肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂上,因此作者将他们的分析限制在这类药物上。专家意见:有证据表明,逆转率很低,大多数对至少100名患者的研究报告的比率低于20%。切换的主要原因通常是患者报告的有效性丧失(通常是主观判断)和副作用。这些发现支持了反安慰剂(“负安慰剂”)效应是一种合理的、可能导致转变的因素。对医疗保健专业人员和患者进行关于生物仿制药有效性和安全性的教育是必要的,这对于打击错误信息和尽量减少反安慰剂效应至关重要,从而使生物仿制药继续促进医疗保健的可持续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
2.30%
发文量
221
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Review of Clinical Immunology (ISSN 1744-666X) provides expert analysis and commentary regarding the performance of new therapeutic and diagnostic modalities in clinical immunology. Members of the International Editorial Advisory Panel of Expert Review of Clinical Immunology are the forefront of their area of expertise. This panel works with our dedicated editorial team to identify the most important and topical review themes and the corresponding expert(s) most appropriate to provide commentary and analysis. All articles are subject to rigorous peer-review, and the finished reviews provide an essential contribution to decision-making in clinical immunology. Articles focus on the following key areas: • Therapeutic overviews of specific immunologic disorders highlighting optimal therapy and prospects for new medicines • Performance and benefits of newly approved therapeutic agents • New diagnostic approaches • Screening and patient stratification • Pharmacoeconomic studies • New therapeutic indications for existing therapies • Adverse effects, occurrence and reduction • Prospects for medicines in late-stage trials approaching regulatory approval • Novel treatment strategies • Epidemiological studies • Commentary and comparison of treatment guidelines Topics include infection and immunity, inflammation, host defense mechanisms, congenital and acquired immunodeficiencies, anaphylaxis and allergy, systemic immune diseases, organ-specific inflammatory diseases, transplantation immunology, endocrinology and diabetes, cancer immunology, neuroimmunology and hematological diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书