{"title":"[Productive Development Partnerships in Brazil: empirical evidence on productive capacity (2011-2024)].","authors":"Alexandra Albareda, Ricardo Lobato Torres","doi":"10.1590/0102-311XPT023826","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Productive Development Partnerships (PDPs) are one of the main instruments of industrial health policy in Brazil, by articulating the purchasing power of the State with the transfer of technology to official pharmaceutical laboratories (LFOs). This article evaluated the extent to which PDPs contributed to strengthening the national production capacity of strategic medicines in the period from 2011 to 2024. A formative evaluation of public policy was carried out, based on documentary analysis, data from government acquisitions and the construction of indicators of productive and technological sustainability. The results show relevant, but uneven, advances between technological platforms, public institutions and therapeutic classes. PDPs associated with synthetic drugs showed greater production stability, while partnerships in biotechnology platforms faced greater challenges of technological internalization. High institutional heterogeneity and concentration of capacities were observed in a few public laboratories. It is concluded that the PDPs represent a strategic instrument for strengthening the Economic-Industrial Health Complex, although their effectiveness remains conditioned to the overcoming of structural weaknesses and the consolidation of long-term productive and technological capacities.</p>","PeriodicalId":9398,"journal":{"name":"Cadernos de saude publica","volume":"42 ","pages":"e00023826"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13539623/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cadernos de saude publica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311XPT023826","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The Productive Development Partnerships (PDPs) are one of the main instruments of industrial health policy in Brazil, by articulating the purchasing power of the State with the transfer of technology to official pharmaceutical laboratories (LFOs). This article evaluated the extent to which PDPs contributed to strengthening the national production capacity of strategic medicines in the period from 2011 to 2024. A formative evaluation of public policy was carried out, based on documentary analysis, data from government acquisitions and the construction of indicators of productive and technological sustainability. The results show relevant, but uneven, advances between technological platforms, public institutions and therapeutic classes. PDPs associated with synthetic drugs showed greater production stability, while partnerships in biotechnology platforms faced greater challenges of technological internalization. High institutional heterogeneity and concentration of capacities were observed in a few public laboratories. It is concluded that the PDPs represent a strategic instrument for strengthening the Economic-Industrial Health Complex, although their effectiveness remains conditioned to the overcoming of structural weaknesses and the consolidation of long-term productive and technological capacities.
期刊介绍:
Cadernos de Saúde Pública/Reports in Public Health (CSP) is a monthly journal published by the Sergio Arouca National School of Public Health, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (ENSP/FIOCRUZ).
The journal is devoted to the publication of scientific articles focusing on the production of knowledge in Public Health. CSP also aims to foster critical reflection and debate on current themes related to public policies and factors that impact populations'' living conditions and health care.
All articles submitted to CSP are judiciously evaluated by the Editorial Board, composed of the Editors-in-Chief and Associate Editors, respecting the diversity of approaches, objects, and methods of the different disciplines characterizing the field of Public Health. Originality, relevance, and methodological rigor are the principal characteristics considered in the editorial evaluation. The article evaluation system practiced by CSP consists of two stages.