Effect of cross-section and stirrup configuration on the torsional performance of geopolymer concrete columns under compression

IF 8.1 2区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Cheng Peng, Hyeon-Jong Hwang, Yunxing Du, Dong Ding, Xiang Hu, Shuisheng Li, Caijun Shi
{"title":"Effect of cross-section and stirrup configuration on the torsional performance of geopolymer concrete columns under compression","authors":"Cheng Peng, Hyeon-Jong Hwang, Yunxing Du, Dong Ding, Xiang Hu, Shuisheng Li, Caijun Shi","doi":"10.1016/j.jobe.2026.117257","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To clarify the compression-torsion behavior of slag-based geopolymer concrete (GPC) columns with different cross-sections and stirrup details, quasi-static tests and finite element analyses were conducted on nine solid and three hollow-section columns. The test parameters were axial compression ratio, stirrup spacing, stirrup diameter, and cross-section configuration. The results showed that the specimens mainly failed in torsion-bending, shear-torsion, or compression-torsion modes, and a higher axial compression ratio promoted rapid propagation of diagonal cracks and intensified brittle failure. Hollow-section specimens showed faster stiffness degradation after cracking, and their peak torques were only 59.4%-71.4% of those of the corresponding solid specimens. Axial compression delayed cracking and enhanced torsional capacity up to an axial compression ratio of about 0.6; beyond this value, premature compression damage weakened the beneficial effect and promoted brittle post-peak degradation. The most favorable strength-deformation balance was obtained when the longitudinal bar-to-stirrup strength ratio was approximately 1.20. The finite element model reasonably reproduced the crack distribution and stress redistribution, but certain deviations remained in the curve slope and post-peak response. Current design models for ordinary concrete generally overestimated the torsional capacity of GPC columns, especially for hollow-section specimens. Based on these findings, a modified method applicable to C30 grade solid-section GPC columns was proposed, while the hollow-section tests provided preliminary evidence of the influence of section form on post-cracking torsional resistance. The mean ratio of predicted to experimental results was 1.014, indicating reasonable accuracy with a certain safety reserve.","PeriodicalId":15064,"journal":{"name":"Journal of building engineering","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of building engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2026.117257","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To clarify the compression-torsion behavior of slag-based geopolymer concrete (GPC) columns with different cross-sections and stirrup details, quasi-static tests and finite element analyses were conducted on nine solid and three hollow-section columns. The test parameters were axial compression ratio, stirrup spacing, stirrup diameter, and cross-section configuration. The results showed that the specimens mainly failed in torsion-bending, shear-torsion, or compression-torsion modes, and a higher axial compression ratio promoted rapid propagation of diagonal cracks and intensified brittle failure. Hollow-section specimens showed faster stiffness degradation after cracking, and their peak torques were only 59.4%-71.4% of those of the corresponding solid specimens. Axial compression delayed cracking and enhanced torsional capacity up to an axial compression ratio of about 0.6; beyond this value, premature compression damage weakened the beneficial effect and promoted brittle post-peak degradation. The most favorable strength-deformation balance was obtained when the longitudinal bar-to-stirrup strength ratio was approximately 1.20. The finite element model reasonably reproduced the crack distribution and stress redistribution, but certain deviations remained in the curve slope and post-peak response. Current design models for ordinary concrete generally overestimated the torsional capacity of GPC columns, especially for hollow-section specimens. Based on these findings, a modified method applicable to C30 grade solid-section GPC columns was proposed, while the hollow-section tests provided preliminary evidence of the influence of section form on post-cracking torsional resistance. The mean ratio of predicted to experimental results was 1.014, indicating reasonable accuracy with a certain safety reserve.
截面和箍筋构型对地聚合物混凝土受压抗扭性能的影响
为明确不同截面和箍筋细部渣基地聚合物混凝土(GPC)柱的压扭特性,对9根实心柱和3根空心柱进行了拟静力试验和有限元分析。试验参数为轴压比、箍筋间距、箍筋直径和截面构型。结果表明:试件主要以扭转-弯曲、剪切-扭转和压缩-扭转三种破坏模式破坏,较高的轴压比促进了斜裂纹的快速扩展,脆性破坏加剧;空心截面试件开裂后刚度退化较快,峰值扭矩仅为实体试件的59.4% ~ 71.4%。轴压延迟开裂,增强抗扭能力,轴压比约为0.6;超过此值,过早压缩损伤削弱了有益效果,促进了脆性峰后退化。当纵向筋箍强度比约为1.20时,得到了最有利的强度-变形平衡。有限元模型较好地再现了裂缝分布和应力分布,但曲线斜率和峰后响应存在一定偏差。现有的普通混凝土设计模型普遍高估了GPC柱的抗扭能力,特别是空心截面试件。在此基础上,提出了一种适用于C30级实截面GPC柱的修正方法,并通过空心截面试验初步验证了截面形式对开裂后抗扭性能的影响。预测结果与实验结果的平均比值为1.014,精度合理,有一定的安全储备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of building engineering
Journal of building engineering Engineering-Civil and Structural Engineering
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
1901
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Building Engineering is an interdisciplinary journal that covers all aspects of science and technology concerned with the whole life cycle of the built environment; from the design phase through to construction, operation, performance, maintenance and its deterioration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书