Endometriosis-associated bone loss: re-evaluating the potential role of systemic inflammation and hypoestrogenic therapies.

IF 2.4 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Frontiers in global women's health Pub Date : 2026-08-19 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fgwh.2026.1895443
Farzaneh Motafeghi, Marzieh Saei Ghare Naz, Fahimeh Ramezani Tehrani, Samira Behboudi-Gandevani
{"title":"Endometriosis-associated bone loss: re-evaluating the potential role of systemic inflammation and hypoestrogenic therapies.","authors":"Farzaneh Motafeghi, Marzieh Saei Ghare Naz, Fahimeh Ramezani Tehrani, Samira Behboudi-Gandevani","doi":"10.3389/fgwh.2026.1895443","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Endometriosis is frequently managed with hormonal suppression that can induce hypoestrogenism during a period when many patients are still accruing peak bone mass. This narrative review summarizes current clinical and mechanistic evidence on bone health in endometriosis and its treatments and discusses a preliminary conceptual framework for risk stratification and monitoring. This review discusses two hypothetical converging pathways: (1) an intrinsic pathway in which chronic systemic inflammation may shift bone remodeling toward resorption (via cytokine-mediated effects on osteoclastogenic and Wnt signaling pathways and oxidative stress), and (2) an iatrogenic pathway in which ovarian suppression, most notably with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists/antagonists and some progestin-based regimens, reduces estrogen exposure and can lead to measurable short-term bone mineral density loss. Available observational data generally do not show clinically meaningful bone mineral density deficits or excess fracture incidence in untreated endometriosis, but treatment-associated bone mineral density loss is well documented; long-term fracture outcomes and bone-quality measures remain insufficiently studied. We compare the skeletal safety signals across commonly used therapies, discuss the role and limitations of add-back therapy, and highlight when baseline evaluation and follow-up assessment (including consideration of trabecular bone score) may be warranted in higher-risk patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":73087,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in global women's health","volume":"7 ","pages":"1895443"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13535529/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in global women's health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fgwh.2026.1895443","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Endometriosis is frequently managed with hormonal suppression that can induce hypoestrogenism during a period when many patients are still accruing peak bone mass. This narrative review summarizes current clinical and mechanistic evidence on bone health in endometriosis and its treatments and discusses a preliminary conceptual framework for risk stratification and monitoring. This review discusses two hypothetical converging pathways: (1) an intrinsic pathway in which chronic systemic inflammation may shift bone remodeling toward resorption (via cytokine-mediated effects on osteoclastogenic and Wnt signaling pathways and oxidative stress), and (2) an iatrogenic pathway in which ovarian suppression, most notably with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists/antagonists and some progestin-based regimens, reduces estrogen exposure and can lead to measurable short-term bone mineral density loss. Available observational data generally do not show clinically meaningful bone mineral density deficits or excess fracture incidence in untreated endometriosis, but treatment-associated bone mineral density loss is well documented; long-term fracture outcomes and bone-quality measures remain insufficiently studied. We compare the skeletal safety signals across commonly used therapies, discuss the role and limitations of add-back therapy, and highlight when baseline evaluation and follow-up assessment (including consideration of trabecular bone score) may be warranted in higher-risk patients.

子宫内膜异位症相关骨质流失:重新评估全身性炎症和低雌激素治疗的潜在作用。
子宫内膜异位症通常采用激素抑制治疗,在许多患者仍在积累峰值骨量的时期,激素抑制会导致雌激素水平低下。本文综述了目前子宫内膜异位症的骨健康及其治疗的临床和机制证据,并讨论了风险分层和监测的初步概念框架。这篇综述讨论了两种假设的收敛路径:(1)慢性全身性炎症可能将骨重塑转向骨吸收的内在途径(通过细胞因子介导的破骨细胞和Wnt信号通路以及氧化应激的作用);(2)医源性途径,卵巢抑制,尤其是促性腺激素释放激素激动剂/拮抗剂和一些以孕激素为基础的方案,减少雌激素暴露,并可能导致可测量的短期骨密度损失。现有的观察数据通常没有显示未经治疗的子宫内膜异位症有临床意义的骨密度缺陷或骨折发生率过高,但治疗相关的骨密度损失有很好的记录;长期骨折结果和骨质量测量仍未得到充分研究。我们比较了常用治疗方法的骨骼安全信号,讨论了加回治疗的作用和局限性,并强调了基线评估和随访评估(包括考虑骨小梁评分)在高危患者中的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书