{"title":"Endometriosis-associated bone loss: re-evaluating the potential role of systemic inflammation and hypoestrogenic therapies.","authors":"Farzaneh Motafeghi, Marzieh Saei Ghare Naz, Fahimeh Ramezani Tehrani, Samira Behboudi-Gandevani","doi":"10.3389/fgwh.2026.1895443","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Endometriosis is frequently managed with hormonal suppression that can induce hypoestrogenism during a period when many patients are still accruing peak bone mass. This narrative review summarizes current clinical and mechanistic evidence on bone health in endometriosis and its treatments and discusses a preliminary conceptual framework for risk stratification and monitoring. This review discusses two hypothetical converging pathways: (1) an intrinsic pathway in which chronic systemic inflammation may shift bone remodeling toward resorption (via cytokine-mediated effects on osteoclastogenic and Wnt signaling pathways and oxidative stress), and (2) an iatrogenic pathway in which ovarian suppression, most notably with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists/antagonists and some progestin-based regimens, reduces estrogen exposure and can lead to measurable short-term bone mineral density loss. Available observational data generally do not show clinically meaningful bone mineral density deficits or excess fracture incidence in untreated endometriosis, but treatment-associated bone mineral density loss is well documented; long-term fracture outcomes and bone-quality measures remain insufficiently studied. We compare the skeletal safety signals across commonly used therapies, discuss the role and limitations of add-back therapy, and highlight when baseline evaluation and follow-up assessment (including consideration of trabecular bone score) may be warranted in higher-risk patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":73087,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in global women's health","volume":"7 ","pages":"1895443"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13535529/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in global women's health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fgwh.2026.1895443","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Endometriosis is frequently managed with hormonal suppression that can induce hypoestrogenism during a period when many patients are still accruing peak bone mass. This narrative review summarizes current clinical and mechanistic evidence on bone health in endometriosis and its treatments and discusses a preliminary conceptual framework for risk stratification and monitoring. This review discusses two hypothetical converging pathways: (1) an intrinsic pathway in which chronic systemic inflammation may shift bone remodeling toward resorption (via cytokine-mediated effects on osteoclastogenic and Wnt signaling pathways and oxidative stress), and (2) an iatrogenic pathway in which ovarian suppression, most notably with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists/antagonists and some progestin-based regimens, reduces estrogen exposure and can lead to measurable short-term bone mineral density loss. Available observational data generally do not show clinically meaningful bone mineral density deficits or excess fracture incidence in untreated endometriosis, but treatment-associated bone mineral density loss is well documented; long-term fracture outcomes and bone-quality measures remain insufficiently studied. We compare the skeletal safety signals across commonly used therapies, discuss the role and limitations of add-back therapy, and highlight when baseline evaluation and follow-up assessment (including consideration of trabecular bone score) may be warranted in higher-risk patients.