Memory, social cognition, and beyond: Neuropsychological markers differentiating Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal dementia.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Jana Marie Freitag, Franz Felix Konen, Johannes Heck, Kirsten Jahn, Stefanie Groba, Martin Klietz, Thomas Skripuletz, Florian Wegner, Martin Schulze Westhoff, Sebastian Schröder
{"title":"Memory, social cognition, and beyond: Neuropsychological markers differentiating Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal dementia.","authors":"Jana Marie Freitag, Franz Felix Konen, Johannes Heck, Kirsten Jahn, Stefanie Groba, Martin Klietz, Thomas Skripuletz, Florian Wegner, Martin Schulze Westhoff, Sebastian Schröder","doi":"10.1177/13872877261480113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundDistinguishing Alzheimer's disease (AD) from frontotemporal dementia (FTD) remains a major clinical challenge, particularly in early disease stages due to overlapping symptoms. Although neuropsychological assessment is central to diagnosis, brief cognitive screening instruments often emphasize episodic memory, whereas comprehensive neuropsychological assessment encompasses multiple cognitive domains. Nevertheless, social cognition and other relevant functions may remain underrepresented in routine clinical assessment.ObjectiveTo identify neuropsychological domains and test procedures that reliably differentiate AD from FTD and support differential diagnosis.MethodsA systematic PubMed literature search was conducted using predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Original studies directly comparing neuropsychological performance in patients with AD and FTD were included. Owing to methodological heterogeneity, findings were synthesized narratively.ResultsA total of 322 records were identified, of which 80 studies met the inclusion criteria. A clear domain-specific pattern emerged. Episodic memory impairment, particularly delayed recall deficits, consistently distinguished AD from FTD, with poorer performance in AD. In contrast, deficits in social cognition, including theory of mind and emotion recognition, were more pronounced in FTD and were often detectable early in the disease course. Executive functions and language showed heterogeneous findings, with discriminative value depending on specific subdomains and FTD subtypes. Visuospatial functions and attention provided supportive but less consistent differentiation, while global screening instruments showed limited diagnostic specificity.ConclusionsDifferentiation between AD and FTD should not rely on single cognitive domains. The most clinically meaningful distinction is achieved through a multidimensional assessment integrating episodic memory, social cognition, and selected executive and behavioral measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":14929,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease","volume":" ","pages":"13872877261480113"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13872877261480113","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundDistinguishing Alzheimer's disease (AD) from frontotemporal dementia (FTD) remains a major clinical challenge, particularly in early disease stages due to overlapping symptoms. Although neuropsychological assessment is central to diagnosis, brief cognitive screening instruments often emphasize episodic memory, whereas comprehensive neuropsychological assessment encompasses multiple cognitive domains. Nevertheless, social cognition and other relevant functions may remain underrepresented in routine clinical assessment.ObjectiveTo identify neuropsychological domains and test procedures that reliably differentiate AD from FTD and support differential diagnosis.MethodsA systematic PubMed literature search was conducted using predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Original studies directly comparing neuropsychological performance in patients with AD and FTD were included. Owing to methodological heterogeneity, findings were synthesized narratively.ResultsA total of 322 records were identified, of which 80 studies met the inclusion criteria. A clear domain-specific pattern emerged. Episodic memory impairment, particularly delayed recall deficits, consistently distinguished AD from FTD, with poorer performance in AD. In contrast, deficits in social cognition, including theory of mind and emotion recognition, were more pronounced in FTD and were often detectable early in the disease course. Executive functions and language showed heterogeneous findings, with discriminative value depending on specific subdomains and FTD subtypes. Visuospatial functions and attention provided supportive but less consistent differentiation, while global screening instruments showed limited diagnostic specificity.ConclusionsDifferentiation between AD and FTD should not rely on single cognitive domains. The most clinically meaningful distinction is achieved through a multidimensional assessment integrating episodic memory, social cognition, and selected executive and behavioral measures.

记忆、社会认知及其他:区分阿尔茨海默病和额颞叶痴呆的神经心理学标志。
背景区分阿尔茨海默病(AD)和额颞叶痴呆(FTD)仍然是一个主要的临床挑战,特别是在疾病早期阶段,由于症状重叠。虽然神经心理学评估是诊断的核心,但简短的认知筛查工具往往强调情景记忆,而全面的神经心理学评估包括多个认知领域。然而,社会认知和其他相关功能在常规临床评估中可能仍未得到充分体现。目的确定可可靠区分AD和FTD的神经心理学领域和测试程序,为鉴别诊断提供支持。方法采用预设的纳入和排除标准进行系统的PubMed文献检索。直接比较AD和FTD患者神经心理表现的原始研究被纳入。由于方法的异质性,研究结果是综合叙述。结果共纳入文献322篇,其中符合纳入标准的文献80篇。一个明确的领域特定模式出现了。情景记忆障碍,特别是延迟回忆缺陷,一直将AD与FTD区分开来,AD的表现较差。相比之下,社会认知的缺陷,包括心理理论和情绪识别,在FTD中更为明显,并且通常在病程早期就可以检测到。执行功能和语言表现出异质的结果,具有区别性的价值取决于特定的子域和FTD亚型。视觉空间功能和注意力提供了支持性但不太一致的区分,而全球筛查工具显示有限的诊断特异性。结论AD与FTD的鉴别不应依赖于单一的认知领域。最有临床意义的区分是通过整合情景记忆、社会认知和选择的执行和行为措施的多维评估来实现的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.50%
发文量
1327
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Alzheimer''s Disease (JAD) is an international multidisciplinary journal to facilitate progress in understanding the etiology, pathogenesis, epidemiology, genetics, behavior, treatment and psychology of Alzheimer''s disease. The journal publishes research reports, reviews, short communications, hypotheses, ethics reviews, book reviews, and letters-to-the-editor. The journal is dedicated to providing an open forum for original research that will expedite our fundamental understanding of Alzheimer''s disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书