Noninvasive Respiratory Support Before Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Meta-Analysis.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Alberto Marabotti, Giovanni Cianchi, Pietro Bertini, Gianluca Paternoster, Fabio Sangalli, Marina Orlandi, Andrea Franci, Manuela Bonizzoli
{"title":"Noninvasive Respiratory Support Before Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Alberto Marabotti, Giovanni Cianchi, Pietro Bertini, Gianluca Paternoster, Fabio Sangalli, Marina Orlandi, Andrea Franci, Manuela Bonizzoli","doi":"10.1097/MAT.0000000000002833","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The optimal timing for transitioning from noninvasive respiratory support to invasive mechanical ventilation and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) remains controversial. PubMed and Embase were searched for studies reporting the duration of noninvasive respiratory support and the total duration of pre-ECMO respiratory support among survivors and non-survivors. A random-effects model with the Hartung-Knapp adjustment was used. Certainty of evidence was rated using the GRADE approach. Ten studies involving 718 patients were included. Survivors spent significantly fewer days on noninvasive respiratory support before ECMO (mean difference [MD]: -1.88 days [95% confidence interval (CI): -2.81 to -0.96]; p < 0.01), with a 95% prediction interval (PI) ranging from -3.71 to -0.05; GRADE certainty: Low. In the total pre-ECMO respiratory support duration (noninvasive plus invasive) analysis, the MD widened to -3.49 days (95% CI: -6.20 to -0.78, p = 0.03), with a PI ranging from -8.04 to 1.06; GRADE certainty: Very Low. These data suggest that the duration of pre-ECMO noninvasive respiratory support could jeopardize the success of the treatment; however, they are based on observational studies and should be considered hypothesis-generating, advocating further research on this topic.</p>","PeriodicalId":8844,"journal":{"name":"ASAIO Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASAIO Journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAT.0000000000002833","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The optimal timing for transitioning from noninvasive respiratory support to invasive mechanical ventilation and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) remains controversial. PubMed and Embase were searched for studies reporting the duration of noninvasive respiratory support and the total duration of pre-ECMO respiratory support among survivors and non-survivors. A random-effects model with the Hartung-Knapp adjustment was used. Certainty of evidence was rated using the GRADE approach. Ten studies involving 718 patients were included. Survivors spent significantly fewer days on noninvasive respiratory support before ECMO (mean difference [MD]: -1.88 days [95% confidence interval (CI): -2.81 to -0.96]; p < 0.01), with a 95% prediction interval (PI) ranging from -3.71 to -0.05; GRADE certainty: Low. In the total pre-ECMO respiratory support duration (noninvasive plus invasive) analysis, the MD widened to -3.49 days (95% CI: -6.20 to -0.78, p = 0.03), with a PI ranging from -8.04 to 1.06; GRADE certainty: Very Low. These data suggest that the duration of pre-ECMO noninvasive respiratory support could jeopardize the success of the treatment; however, they are based on observational studies and should be considered hypothesis-generating, advocating further research on this topic.

急性呼吸窘迫综合征体外膜氧合前无创呼吸支持:一项荟萃分析。
在严重急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)中,从无创呼吸支持过渡到有创机械通气和体外膜氧合(ECMO)的最佳时机仍然存在争议。PubMed和Embase检索了幸存者和非幸存者中报告无创呼吸支持持续时间和ecmo前呼吸支持总持续时间的研究。采用Hartung-Knapp平差的随机效应模型。使用GRADE方法对证据的确定性进行评级。纳入了10项研究,涉及718例患者。幸存者在ECMO前接受无创呼吸支持的天数明显减少(平均差[MD]: -1.88天[95%可信区间(CI): -2.81至-0.96];p < 0.01), 95%预测区间(PI)为-3.71 ~ -0.05;等级确定性:低。在ecmo前呼吸支持总持续时间(无创加有创)分析中,MD扩大至-3.49天(95% CI: -6.20至-0.78,p = 0.03), PI范围为-8.04至1.06;等级确定性:非常低。这些数据表明,ecmo前无创呼吸支持的持续时间可能危及治疗的成功;然而,它们是基于观察性研究,应该被认为是假设生成,提倡对这一主题进行进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ASAIO Journal
ASAIO Journal 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
651
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ASAIO Journal is in the forefront of artificial organ research and development. On the cutting edge of innovative technology, it features peer-reviewed articles of the highest quality that describe research, development, the most recent advances in the design of artificial organ devices and findings from initial testing. Bimonthly, the ASAIO Journal features state-of-the-art investigations, laboratory and clinical trials, and discussions and opinions from experts around the world. The official publication of the American Society for Artificial Internal Organs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书