Learning curve of pocket-creation method-assisted colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: a single-operator retrospective observational study from South Korea using cumulative sum analysis.

IF 3.4 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Jae Hyun Kim
{"title":"Learning curve of pocket-creation method-assisted colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: a single-operator retrospective observational study from South Korea using cumulative sum analysis.","authors":"Jae Hyun Kim","doi":"10.5946/ce.2026.127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (C-ESD) is a technically demanding procedure with an extended learning curve. We aimed to characterize the learning process after introduction of the pocket-creation method (PCM) and provide practical guidance for endoscopists.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 147 colorectal lesions treated with PCM-assisted C-ESD. Learning curves for dissection speed and procedure time were evaluated using locally weighted regression. Cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis was used to identify the point of technical stabilization, with a predefined acceptable failure rate of 10%. Outcomes were compared between the pre- and post-stabilization phases, and multivariate logistic regression was used to identify the predictors of technical failure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Dissection speed increased and procedure time decreased with experience. CUSUM analysis identified stabilization at 60 cases. Compared with the post-stabilization phase, the pre-stabilization phase showed higher technical failure rates and lower en bloc and R0 resection rates. The learning phase was the only independent predictor of technical failure. Perforation occurred in 5.4% of cases and was managed predominantly endoscopically.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PCM-assisted C-ESD showed a distinct learning curve, with stabilization achieved after 60 cases. Technical failure is primarily driven by operator experience rather than by lesion complexity.</p>","PeriodicalId":10351,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Endoscopy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2026.127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/aims: Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (C-ESD) is a technically demanding procedure with an extended learning curve. We aimed to characterize the learning process after introduction of the pocket-creation method (PCM) and provide practical guidance for endoscopists.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 147 colorectal lesions treated with PCM-assisted C-ESD. Learning curves for dissection speed and procedure time were evaluated using locally weighted regression. Cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis was used to identify the point of technical stabilization, with a predefined acceptable failure rate of 10%. Outcomes were compared between the pre- and post-stabilization phases, and multivariate logistic regression was used to identify the predictors of technical failure.

Results: Dissection speed increased and procedure time decreased with experience. CUSUM analysis identified stabilization at 60 cases. Compared with the post-stabilization phase, the pre-stabilization phase showed higher technical failure rates and lower en bloc and R0 resection rates. The learning phase was the only independent predictor of technical failure. Perforation occurred in 5.4% of cases and was managed predominantly endoscopically.

Conclusions: PCM-assisted C-ESD showed a distinct learning curve, with stabilization achieved after 60 cases. Technical failure is primarily driven by operator experience rather than by lesion complexity.

口袋创造法辅助结肠内镜粘膜下解剖的学习曲线:韩国使用累积和分析的单操作员回顾性观察研究。
背景/目的:结肠内镜下粘膜下剥离(C-ESD)是一项技术要求高、学习曲线长的手术。我们旨在描述引入口袋创造方法(PCM)后的学习过程,并为内窥镜医师提供实用指导。方法:回顾性分析147例经pcm辅助的C-ESD治疗的结直肠病变。使用局部加权回归评估解剖速度和手术时间的学习曲线。累积和(CUSUM)分析用于确定技术稳定点,预定义的可接受故障率为10%。比较稳定前后阶段的结果,并使用多元逻辑回归来确定技术故障的预测因素。结果:随着经验的增加,解剖速度加快,手术时间缩短。CUSUM分析确定60例患者病情稳定。与稳定后阶段相比,稳定前阶段的技术故障率较高,整体和R0切除率较低。学习阶段是技术失败的唯一独立预测因素。穿孔发生在5.4%的病例中,主要是内窥镜下处理。结论:pcm辅助下的C-ESD具有明显的学习曲线,60例后达到稳定。技术故障主要是由操作人员的经验造成的,而不是由病变的复杂性造成的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Endoscopy
Clinical Endoscopy GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
8.00%
发文量
95
审稿时长
26 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书