Learning curve of pocket-creation method-assisted colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: a single-operator retrospective observational study from South Korea using cumulative sum analysis.
{"title":"Learning curve of pocket-creation method-assisted colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: a single-operator retrospective observational study from South Korea using cumulative sum analysis.","authors":"Jae Hyun Kim","doi":"10.5946/ce.2026.127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (C-ESD) is a technically demanding procedure with an extended learning curve. We aimed to characterize the learning process after introduction of the pocket-creation method (PCM) and provide practical guidance for endoscopists.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 147 colorectal lesions treated with PCM-assisted C-ESD. Learning curves for dissection speed and procedure time were evaluated using locally weighted regression. Cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis was used to identify the point of technical stabilization, with a predefined acceptable failure rate of 10%. Outcomes were compared between the pre- and post-stabilization phases, and multivariate logistic regression was used to identify the predictors of technical failure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Dissection speed increased and procedure time decreased with experience. CUSUM analysis identified stabilization at 60 cases. Compared with the post-stabilization phase, the pre-stabilization phase showed higher technical failure rates and lower en bloc and R0 resection rates. The learning phase was the only independent predictor of technical failure. Perforation occurred in 5.4% of cases and was managed predominantly endoscopically.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PCM-assisted C-ESD showed a distinct learning curve, with stabilization achieved after 60 cases. Technical failure is primarily driven by operator experience rather than by lesion complexity.</p>","PeriodicalId":10351,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Endoscopy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2026.127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background/aims: Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (C-ESD) is a technically demanding procedure with an extended learning curve. We aimed to characterize the learning process after introduction of the pocket-creation method (PCM) and provide practical guidance for endoscopists.
Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 147 colorectal lesions treated with PCM-assisted C-ESD. Learning curves for dissection speed and procedure time were evaluated using locally weighted regression. Cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis was used to identify the point of technical stabilization, with a predefined acceptable failure rate of 10%. Outcomes were compared between the pre- and post-stabilization phases, and multivariate logistic regression was used to identify the predictors of technical failure.
Results: Dissection speed increased and procedure time decreased with experience. CUSUM analysis identified stabilization at 60 cases. Compared with the post-stabilization phase, the pre-stabilization phase showed higher technical failure rates and lower en bloc and R0 resection rates. The learning phase was the only independent predictor of technical failure. Perforation occurred in 5.4% of cases and was managed predominantly endoscopically.
Conclusions: PCM-assisted C-ESD showed a distinct learning curve, with stabilization achieved after 60 cases. Technical failure is primarily driven by operator experience rather than by lesion complexity.