Hot and cold deserts as eco-evolutionary arenas for understanding plant resistance to multiple abiotic stressors.

IF 10.9 1区 生物学 Q1 BIOLOGY
Marc Fradera-Soler, Natasha Barbolini, Anže Žerdoner Čalasan, Marian Schubert, Catarina Rydin, Olwen M Grace, Aelys M Humphreys
{"title":"Hot and cold deserts as eco-evolutionary arenas for understanding plant resistance to multiple abiotic stressors.","authors":"Marc Fradera-Soler, Natasha Barbolini, Anže Žerdoner Čalasan, Marian Schubert, Catarina Rydin, Olwen M Grace, Aelys M Humphreys","doi":"10.1002/brv.70207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>During their long evolutionary history, land plants have evolved a range of adaptations to different abiotic stressors. These help explain present-day diversity and distribution patterns, as well as the potential resilience of natural and agricultural systems to a changing climate. Most previous research has focused on adaptation to individual stressors and much less is known about how plants deal with exposure to multiple abiotic stressors. Consequently, the evolutionary processes leading to abiotic stress polyresistance (i.e. resistance to multiple abiotic stressors) remain poorly understood. Here, we showcase plants in hot and cold deserts as a compelling system for studying evolution of polyresistance. We focus on three abiotic stressors with substantial physiological overlap - drought, frost and salinity - and present six plant groups that occur in both hot and cold deserts, thus being exposed to these stressors in at least parts of their ranges: Gnetales, Amaranthaceae sensu lato, Nitrariaceae, Poaceae, Tamaricaceae-Frankeniaceae and Zygophyllaceae. We examine key questions regarding the sequence and mechanisms underlying abiotic stress polyresistance evolution and summarize the diverse adaptive strategies that allow persistence under multiple environmental pressures. In doing so, we highlight how trade-offs and facilitation among abiotic stress responses may have influenced the evolutionary pathways that lead to present-day polyresistance. Despite limited evidence, broad patterns emerge for the plant groups examined here, with facilitation appearing especially important, at least during early stages of polyresistance evolution. However, fundamental knowledge gaps remain. Macroevolutionary and macroecological approaches, coupled with historical biogeography and palaeoclimatic and palaeoecological reconstructions, can be used to advance understanding of abiotic stress polyresistance evolution in plants. This will pave the way for applied trait-based research to support climate change mitigation, conservation and sustainable crop improvement in a rapidly changing world.</p>","PeriodicalId":133,"journal":{"name":"Biological Reviews","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/brv.70207","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During their long evolutionary history, land plants have evolved a range of adaptations to different abiotic stressors. These help explain present-day diversity and distribution patterns, as well as the potential resilience of natural and agricultural systems to a changing climate. Most previous research has focused on adaptation to individual stressors and much less is known about how plants deal with exposure to multiple abiotic stressors. Consequently, the evolutionary processes leading to abiotic stress polyresistance (i.e. resistance to multiple abiotic stressors) remain poorly understood. Here, we showcase plants in hot and cold deserts as a compelling system for studying evolution of polyresistance. We focus on three abiotic stressors with substantial physiological overlap - drought, frost and salinity - and present six plant groups that occur in both hot and cold deserts, thus being exposed to these stressors in at least parts of their ranges: Gnetales, Amaranthaceae sensu lato, Nitrariaceae, Poaceae, Tamaricaceae-Frankeniaceae and Zygophyllaceae. We examine key questions regarding the sequence and mechanisms underlying abiotic stress polyresistance evolution and summarize the diverse adaptive strategies that allow persistence under multiple environmental pressures. In doing so, we highlight how trade-offs and facilitation among abiotic stress responses may have influenced the evolutionary pathways that lead to present-day polyresistance. Despite limited evidence, broad patterns emerge for the plant groups examined here, with facilitation appearing especially important, at least during early stages of polyresistance evolution. However, fundamental knowledge gaps remain. Macroevolutionary and macroecological approaches, coupled with historical biogeography and palaeoclimatic and palaeoecological reconstructions, can be used to advance understanding of abiotic stress polyresistance evolution in plants. This will pave the way for applied trait-based research to support climate change mitigation, conservation and sustainable crop improvement in a rapidly changing world.

热沙漠和冷沙漠作为了解植物对多种非生物胁迫的抗性的生态进化舞台。
在漫长的进化过程中,陆地植物进化出了一系列适应不同非生物胁迫的能力。这些有助于解释当今的多样性和分布模式,以及自然和农业系统对气候变化的潜在复原力。以前的大多数研究都集中在对单个压力源的适应上,而对植物如何应对暴露于多种非生物压力源的了解甚少。因此,导致非生物胁迫多抗性(即对多种非生物胁迫的抗性)的进化过程仍然知之甚少。在这里,我们展示了炎热和寒冷沙漠中的植物作为研究多抗性进化的一个引人注目的系统。我们重点研究了干旱、霜冻和盐度这三种具有重大生理重叠的非生物胁迫源,并提出了六种发生在炎热和寒冷沙漠中的植物类群,从而至少在其部分范围内暴露于这些胁迫源:片麻科、苋科、Nitrariaceae、Poaceae、柽柳科- frankeniae和竹叶科。我们研究了关于非生物胁迫多抗性进化的序列和机制的关键问题,并总结了在多种环境压力下允许持久性的各种适应策略。在此过程中,我们强调了非生物应激反应之间的权衡和促进如何影响了导致当今多抗性的进化途径。尽管证据有限,但在这里研究的植物群体中出现了广泛的模式,至少在多抗性进化的早期阶段,促进作用显得尤为重要。然而,基本的知识差距仍然存在。宏观进化和宏观生态学方法,结合历史生物地理学、古气候和古生态重建,可以促进对植物非生物胁迫多抗性进化的理解。这将为基于应用性状的研究铺平道路,以支持在快速变化的世界中减缓气候变化、保护和可持续作物改良。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biological Reviews
Biological Reviews 生物-生物学
CiteScore
21.30
自引率
2.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Biological Reviews is a scientific journal that covers a wide range of topics in the biological sciences. It publishes several review articles per issue, which are aimed at both non-specialist biologists and researchers in the field. The articles are scholarly and include extensive bibliographies. Authors are instructed to be aware of the diverse readership and write their articles accordingly. The reviews in Biological Reviews serve as comprehensive introductions to specific fields, presenting the current state of the art and highlighting gaps in knowledge. Each article can be up to 20,000 words long and includes an abstract, a thorough introduction, and a statement of conclusions. The journal focuses on publishing synthetic reviews, which are based on existing literature and address important biological questions. These reviews are interesting to a broad readership and are timely, often related to fast-moving fields or new discoveries. A key aspect of a synthetic review is that it goes beyond simply compiling information and instead analyzes the collected data to create a new theoretical or conceptual framework that can significantly impact the field. Biological Reviews is abstracted and indexed in various databases, including Abstracts on Hygiene & Communicable Diseases, Academic Search, AgBiotech News & Information, AgBiotechNet, AGRICOLA Database, GeoRef, Global Health, SCOPUS, Weed Abstracts, and Reaction Citation Index, among others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书