Disparities in maternal and fetal health among ethnogeographic groups-a retrospective cohort study of 30,000 women from a middle eastern multiethnic maternity population.

IF 2.4 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Frontiers in global women's health Pub Date : 2026-08-17 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fgwh.2026.1708103
Fathima Minisha, Salwa Abu Yaqoub, Najat Khenyab, Husam Salama, Sawsan AlObaidly, Nader Aldewik, Hilal Al Rifai, Thomas Farrell
{"title":"Disparities in maternal and fetal health among ethnogeographic groups-a retrospective cohort study of 30,000 women from a middle eastern multiethnic maternity population.","authors":"Fathima Minisha, Salwa Abu Yaqoub, Najat Khenyab, Husam Salama, Sawsan AlObaidly, Nader Aldewik, Hilal Al Rifai, Thomas Farrell","doi":"10.3389/fgwh.2026.1708103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Maternal ethnogeographic origins and ancestry can influence perinatal health. This study evaluated the impact of nationalities grouped into geographic categories on maternal and neonatal outcomes.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>The study employed a retrospective birth cohort design.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 30,667 pregnant women and their neonates born at more than 24 weeks' gestational age in secondary and tertiary government maternity hospitals in Qatar were included. Data were extracted from a preexisting maternity registry. Women were classified into seven ethnogeographic groups based on internationally accepted classifications: Qatar group (QG), Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC), Arab Region (AR), South/Central Asia (SA), southeast Asian (SEA), African (AF), and European/American countries. Antenatal, intrapartum, and neonatal outcomes were compared between the groups using adjusted multivariable regression models with QG as the baseline.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants represented 124 countries, with the majority from AR (37.6%). After Qatar (23.7%), the most represented countries were Egypt (12.3%) and India (11.6%). Gestational diabetes was most common in SA at 33.4% [adjusted odds ratio (aOR)=1.56, confidence intervals (CI) = 1.44-1.68; <i>p</i> < 0.0001], whereas SEA had higher odds of preeclampsia (aOR=2.50, CI = 1.86-3.36; <i>p</i> < 0.0001) and postpartum hemorrhage (aOR=1.88, CI = 1.55-2.28; <i>p</i> < 0.0001). Postdated pregnancy was more frequent in AF (aOR=2.34, CI = 1.85-3.0; <i>p</i> < 0.0001), while preterm birth rates were similar across groups. Vaginal birth after cesarean was highest in GCC (42.1%) and lowest in SEA and Africa (19%). Neonatal intensive care admission among term babies was similar across groups. No clinically relevant differences between groups were observed for rare neonatal outcomes such as stillbirth, neonatal death, or anomalies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Clinically relevant differences in pregnancy outcomes exist among nationality groups, potentially attributable to ethnicity, genetic susceptibility, and potential socioeconomic factors. Understanding these differences is essential for adequate risk assessment, and further genetic and anthropological studies are warranted to confirm these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":73087,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in global women's health","volume":"7 ","pages":"1708103"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13527012/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in global women's health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fgwh.2026.1708103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Maternal ethnogeographic origins and ancestry can influence perinatal health. This study evaluated the impact of nationalities grouped into geographic categories on maternal and neonatal outcomes.

Study design: The study employed a retrospective birth cohort design.

Methods: A total of 30,667 pregnant women and their neonates born at more than 24 weeks' gestational age in secondary and tertiary government maternity hospitals in Qatar were included. Data were extracted from a preexisting maternity registry. Women were classified into seven ethnogeographic groups based on internationally accepted classifications: Qatar group (QG), Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC), Arab Region (AR), South/Central Asia (SA), southeast Asian (SEA), African (AF), and European/American countries. Antenatal, intrapartum, and neonatal outcomes were compared between the groups using adjusted multivariable regression models with QG as the baseline.

Results: Participants represented 124 countries, with the majority from AR (37.6%). After Qatar (23.7%), the most represented countries were Egypt (12.3%) and India (11.6%). Gestational diabetes was most common in SA at 33.4% [adjusted odds ratio (aOR)=1.56, confidence intervals (CI) = 1.44-1.68; p < 0.0001], whereas SEA had higher odds of preeclampsia (aOR=2.50, CI = 1.86-3.36; p < 0.0001) and postpartum hemorrhage (aOR=1.88, CI = 1.55-2.28; p < 0.0001). Postdated pregnancy was more frequent in AF (aOR=2.34, CI = 1.85-3.0; p < 0.0001), while preterm birth rates were similar across groups. Vaginal birth after cesarean was highest in GCC (42.1%) and lowest in SEA and Africa (19%). Neonatal intensive care admission among term babies was similar across groups. No clinically relevant differences between groups were observed for rare neonatal outcomes such as stillbirth, neonatal death, or anomalies.

Conclusion: Clinically relevant differences in pregnancy outcomes exist among nationality groups, potentially attributable to ethnicity, genetic susceptibility, and potential socioeconomic factors. Understanding these differences is essential for adequate risk assessment, and further genetic and anthropological studies are warranted to confirm these findings.

民族地理群体中孕产妇和胎儿健康的差异——一项对中东多民族产妇人口中3万名妇女的回顾性队列研究。
目的:母亲的民族地理起源和血统可以影响围产期健康。本研究评估了按地理类别分组的国籍对孕产妇和新生儿结局的影响。研究设计:本研究采用回顾性出生队列设计。方法:在卡塔尔二级和三级政府妇产医院共纳入30,667名孕妇及其24周以上孕龄的新生儿。数据是从先前存在的产妇登记处提取的。根据国际公认的分类,将妇女分为七个民族地理组:卡塔尔组(QG)、海湾合作委员会(GCC)、阿拉伯地区(AR)、南亚/中亚(SA)、东南亚(SEA)、非洲(AF)和欧美国家。采用以QG为基线的校正多变量回归模型比较两组之间的产前、产时和新生儿结局。结果:参与者来自124个国家,其中大多数来自AR(37.6%)。在卡塔尔(23.7%)之后,最具代表性的国家是埃及(12.3%)和印度(11.6%)。妊娠期糖尿病在SA中最为常见,为33.4%[调整优势比(aOR)=1.56,置信区间(CI) = 1.44-1.68;结论:不同民族之间妊娠结局存在临床相关差异,可能归因于种族、遗传易感性和潜在的社会经济因素。了解这些差异对于充分的风险评估至关重要,有必要进行进一步的遗传和人类学研究来证实这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书