Vaccine acceptance in a future pandemic after COVID-19 and its decision drivers in Japan.

IF 7.2 1区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY
Junna Kawasaki, Masakaze Hamada, Masaki Machida, Ryo Komorizono, Mie Kobayashi-Ishihara, Naoko Fujita, Takahiro Tabuchi, Yuki Furuse
{"title":"Vaccine acceptance in a future pandemic after COVID-19 and its decision drivers in Japan.","authors":"Junna Kawasaki, Masakaze Hamada, Masaki Machida, Ryo Komorizono, Mie Kobayashi-Ishihara, Naoko Fujita, Takahiro Tabuchi, Yuki Furuse","doi":"10.1038/s41541-026-01561-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Vaccine hesitancy has long been recognized as a global health concern and has become an even greater challenge during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. Although extensive research has examined hesitancy toward COVID-19, how the general population would respond to vaccination in a future pandemic remains unclear. Furthermore, little is known about the conditions that may reduce hesitancy. In this study, we conducted a nationwide internet survey in Japan in 2024-2025 involving 28,000 participants to assess vaccination intentions in a hypothetical future pandemic, identify factors associated with vaccine hesitancy, and examine conditions that may increase willingness to be vaccinated. We analyzed associations between individual characteristics and vaccination intention using logistic regression and explored heterogeneity in prioritized factors to determine vaccination intention using unsupervised clustering analysis. We found that only 53.1% of respondents reported intending to be vaccinated in a future pandemic-a marked decline from observed COVID-19 vaccination coverage. Notably, 35.8% of individuals who were vaccinated during the COVID-19 pandemic expressed hesitancy. Vaccination intention was lower among adults aged 20-40 years, women, individuals with lower income or educational attainment, and those endorsing misinformation or conspiracy statements. Cluster analysis identified eight distinct groups with heterogeneous priority structures. Free vaccination and evidence from clinical trials were prioritized across all clusters, whereas the prioritization of trust in authorities, social influence, domestic vaccine production, and convenience varied substantially across clusters. Public intentions to vaccinate in a future pandemic are shaped by diverse perspectives and values. Tailored strategies and risk communication approaches that address these heterogeneous concerns may be critical to strengthening preparedness for future pandemics.</p>","PeriodicalId":19335,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Vaccines","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13529798/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NPJ Vaccines","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41541-026-01561-2","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Vaccine hesitancy has long been recognized as a global health concern and has become an even greater challenge during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. Although extensive research has examined hesitancy toward COVID-19, how the general population would respond to vaccination in a future pandemic remains unclear. Furthermore, little is known about the conditions that may reduce hesitancy. In this study, we conducted a nationwide internet survey in Japan in 2024-2025 involving 28,000 participants to assess vaccination intentions in a hypothetical future pandemic, identify factors associated with vaccine hesitancy, and examine conditions that may increase willingness to be vaccinated. We analyzed associations between individual characteristics and vaccination intention using logistic regression and explored heterogeneity in prioritized factors to determine vaccination intention using unsupervised clustering analysis. We found that only 53.1% of respondents reported intending to be vaccinated in a future pandemic-a marked decline from observed COVID-19 vaccination coverage. Notably, 35.8% of individuals who were vaccinated during the COVID-19 pandemic expressed hesitancy. Vaccination intention was lower among adults aged 20-40 years, women, individuals with lower income or educational attainment, and those endorsing misinformation or conspiracy statements. Cluster analysis identified eight distinct groups with heterogeneous priority structures. Free vaccination and evidence from clinical trials were prioritized across all clusters, whereas the prioritization of trust in authorities, social influence, domestic vaccine production, and convenience varied substantially across clusters. Public intentions to vaccinate in a future pandemic are shaped by diverse perspectives and values. Tailored strategies and risk communication approaches that address these heterogeneous concerns may be critical to strengthening preparedness for future pandemics.

COVID-19后未来大流行中的疫苗接受程度及其在日本的决策驱动因素。
疫苗犹豫长期以来一直被认为是一个全球卫生问题,并在COVID-19大流行期间和之后成为更大的挑战。尽管广泛的研究已经调查了人们对COVID-19的犹豫,但在未来的大流行中,普通人群对疫苗接种的反应仍不清楚。此外,人们对可能减少犹豫的条件知之甚少。在这项研究中,我们于2024-2025年在日本进行了一项全国性的互联网调查,涉及28,000名参与者,以评估假设未来大流行中的疫苗接种意图,确定与疫苗犹豫相关的因素,并检查可能增加疫苗接种意愿的条件。我们使用逻辑回归分析了个体特征与接种意愿之间的关联,并使用无监督聚类分析探讨了确定接种意愿的优先因素的异质性。我们发现,只有53.1%的受访者表示打算在未来的大流行中接种疫苗,这与观察到的COVID-19疫苗接种覆盖率相比显着下降。值得注意的是,在COVID-19大流行期间接种疫苗的个人中,有35.8%表示犹豫不决。在20-40岁的成年人、女性、收入或受教育程度较低的个人以及支持错误信息或阴谋言论的人中,接种疫苗的意愿较低。聚类分析确定了8个具有不同优先级结构的不同群体。免费疫苗接种和临床试验证据在所有群集中都是优先考虑的,而对当局的信任、社会影响、国内疫苗生产和便利性的优先考虑在不同群集中差别很大。公众在未来大流行中接种疫苗的意愿受到不同观点和价值观的影响。针对这些不同关切的量身定制战略和风险沟通方法,可能对加强对未来大流行病的防范至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
NPJ Vaccines
NPJ Vaccines Immunology and Microbiology-Immunology
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
4.30%
发文量
146
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Online-only and open access, npj Vaccines is dedicated to highlighting the most important scientific advances in vaccine research and development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书