Machine-learning predictions of high-pressure high-temperature filtrate loss in oil-based drilling fluids from well-site measurements

IF 6.4 1区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Petroleum Science Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-28 DOI:10.1016/j.petsci.2026.03.053
Shadfar Davoodi, Arslan Gulniyazov, David A. Wood, Mohammed Al-Shargabi, Nikita Makarov, Evgeny Burnaev
{"title":"Machine-learning predictions of high-pressure high-temperature filtrate loss in oil-based drilling fluids from well-site measurements","authors":"Shadfar Davoodi,&nbsp;Arslan Gulniyazov,&nbsp;David A. Wood,&nbsp;Mohammed Al-Shargabi,&nbsp;Nikita Makarov,&nbsp;Evgeny Burnaev","doi":"10.1016/j.petsci.2026.03.053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Precise and reliable predictions of filtrate loss (FL) from drilling fluids/muds under high-pressure-high-temperature (HPHT) conditions are required to prevent formation damage, maintain wellbore stability, and optimize drilling efficiency in complex reservoirs. Traditional laboratory-based measurements are too time consuming to provide HPHT FL values that are useable for decision-making while drilling. This study, therefore, develops machine learning (ML) models that enable frequent and prompt predictions of HPHT FL with high accuracy and reliable precision. To this end, a large dataset was compiled containing five input parameters, namely mud temperature (MT), mud weight (MW), funnel viscosity (FV), mud alkalinity (MA), and electrical stability (ES), and a single target variable HPHT FL. Following meticulous data preprocessing, four predictive models were developed using established ML algorithms: multilayer perceptron neural network (MLPNN), support vector regression (SVR), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), and extreme learning machine (ELM). For each ML algorithm, five separate model instances were developed and evaluated, with XGBoost providing the best performance in predicting the target parameter (root mean square error (RMSE) = 0.096 cc/30 min for the testing subset). The superior performance of the XGBoost model was further confirmed by residual, uncertainty, overfitting, and robustness evaluations, indicating its excellent generalization capability. Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) analysis identified ES as the most influential input parameter and FV as the least influential for XGBoost’s HPHT FL predictions. The XGBoost model as developed offers a substantial improvement compared to laboratory FL analysis, enabling more efficient and quicker monitoring of FL in challenging HPHT downhole environments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19938,"journal":{"name":"Petroleum Science","volume":"23 9","pages":"Pages 5543-5560"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Petroleum Science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1995822626001780","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Precise and reliable predictions of filtrate loss (FL) from drilling fluids/muds under high-pressure-high-temperature (HPHT) conditions are required to prevent formation damage, maintain wellbore stability, and optimize drilling efficiency in complex reservoirs. Traditional laboratory-based measurements are too time consuming to provide HPHT FL values that are useable for decision-making while drilling. This study, therefore, develops machine learning (ML) models that enable frequent and prompt predictions of HPHT FL with high accuracy and reliable precision. To this end, a large dataset was compiled containing five input parameters, namely mud temperature (MT), mud weight (MW), funnel viscosity (FV), mud alkalinity (MA), and electrical stability (ES), and a single target variable HPHT FL. Following meticulous data preprocessing, four predictive models were developed using established ML algorithms: multilayer perceptron neural network (MLPNN), support vector regression (SVR), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), and extreme learning machine (ELM). For each ML algorithm, five separate model instances were developed and evaluated, with XGBoost providing the best performance in predicting the target parameter (root mean square error (RMSE) = 0.096 cc/30 min for the testing subset). The superior performance of the XGBoost model was further confirmed by residual, uncertainty, overfitting, and robustness evaluations, indicating its excellent generalization capability. Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) analysis identified ES as the most influential input parameter and FV as the least influential for XGBoost’s HPHT FL predictions. The XGBoost model as developed offers a substantial improvement compared to laboratory FL analysis, enabling more efficient and quicker monitoring of FL in challenging HPHT downhole environments.
基于井场测量的油基钻井液高压高温滤液损失的机器学习预测
在高压高温(HPHT)条件下,需要精确可靠地预测钻井液/泥浆的滤失量(FL),以防止地层损害,保持井筒稳定性,并优化复杂油藏的钻井效率。传统的基于实验室的测量方法太耗时,无法提供可用于钻井决策的高温高压FL值。因此,本研究开发了机器学习(ML)模型,能够以高精度和可靠的精度频繁和及时地预测HPHT FL。为此,编制了一个大型数据集,包含5个输入参数,即泥浆温度(MT)、泥浆重量(MW)、漏斗粘度(FV)、泥浆碱度(MA)和电稳定性(ES),以及单个目标变量HPHT FL。经过精心的数据预处理,使用已建立的机器学习算法建立了4个预测模型:多层感知器神经网络(MLPNN)、支持向量回归(SVR)、极端梯度增强(XGBoost)和极端学习机(ELM)。对于每个ML算法,开发并评估了五个独立的模型实例,XGBoost在预测目标参数方面提供了最佳性能(测试子集的均方根误差(RMSE) = 0.096 cc/30分钟)。残差、不确定性、过拟合和鲁棒性评估进一步证实了XGBoost模型的优越性能,表明其具有良好的泛化能力。Shapley加性解释(SHAP)分析发现ES是影响最大的输入参数,而FV对XGBoost的HPHT FL预测影响最小。与实验室FL分析相比,开发的XGBoost模型有了很大的改进,可以在具有挑战性的高温高压井下环境中更高效、更快速地监测FL。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Petroleum Science
Petroleum Science 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
16.10%
发文量
311
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: Petroleum Science is the only English journal in China on petroleum science and technology that is intended for professionals engaged in petroleum science research and technical applications all over the world, as well as the managerial personnel of oil companies. It covers petroleum geology, petroleum geophysics, petroleum engineering, petrochemistry & chemical engineering, petroleum mechanics, and economic management. It aims to introduce the latest results in oil industry research in China, promote cooperation in petroleum science research between China and the rest of the world, and build a bridge for scientific communication between China and the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书