Driving anger reduces the evasive response likelihood in near-crash events: Insights from SHRP 2 Naturalistic Driving Study

IF 4.3 2区 工程技术 Q1 ERGONOMICS
Journal of Safety Research Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-08-23 DOI:10.1016/j.jsr.2026.08.015
Manhua Wang, Shu Han, Feng Guo
{"title":"Driving anger reduces the evasive response likelihood in near-crash events: Insights from SHRP 2 Naturalistic Driving Study","authors":"Manhua Wang,&nbsp;Shu Han,&nbsp;Feng Guo","doi":"10.1016/j.jsr.2026.08.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div><em>Introduction:</em> Anger is a prevalent emotion that has been shown to negatively impact driving behavior, contributing to aggressive driving and road rage—both of which are well-known threats to traffic safety. This study investigated the effects of driving anger on evasive maneuvers immediately preceding crashes and near-crashes using naturalistic driving data, with particular attention to how emotional state interacts with event severity. <em>Methods:</em> This study used data from the Second Strategic Highway Research Program (SHRP 2) Naturalistic Driving Study (NDS) and employed a case-cohort approach to evaluate the influence of anger on drivers’ reactions to traffic conflicts. Association analyses were performed to evaluate the relationship between driving anger and other risk factors, including driver age, gender, and risky driving behavior scores. Logistic regression models were constructed to investigate the likelihood of an evasive maneuver given driver age, event severity, and the presence of driving anger. <em>Results:</em> Findings showed that teen drivers (ages 16–19) and young drivers (ages 20–29) were more likely to take evasive maneuvers in response to safety-critical events (i.e., near-crash and crash events) compared to middle-aged drivers. There was an interaction between event severity and driving anger presence; angry drivers were less likely to perform evasive maneuvers in near-crash events compared to non-impaired drivers. Among events with evasive maneuver present, anger was associated with comparable likelihood of braking, but reduced likelihood of combined braking-and-steering maneuvers compared to no impairment. <em>Conclusions:</em> The findings demonstrate that driving anger alters both the likelihood and structure of evasive responses in safety-critical situations, particularly in less severe but time-sensitive conflicts. <em>Practical Applications:</em> Our findings can inform the design of in-vehicle driver monitoring and alert systems and active safety technologies aimed at mitigating the risk of “no avoidance maneuver” behavior under heightened emotional states.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48224,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Safety Research","volume":"98 ","pages":"Pages 552-560"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Safety Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022437526001544","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ERGONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Anger is a prevalent emotion that has been shown to negatively impact driving behavior, contributing to aggressive driving and road rage—both of which are well-known threats to traffic safety. This study investigated the effects of driving anger on evasive maneuvers immediately preceding crashes and near-crashes using naturalistic driving data, with particular attention to how emotional state interacts with event severity. Methods: This study used data from the Second Strategic Highway Research Program (SHRP 2) Naturalistic Driving Study (NDS) and employed a case-cohort approach to evaluate the influence of anger on drivers’ reactions to traffic conflicts. Association analyses were performed to evaluate the relationship between driving anger and other risk factors, including driver age, gender, and risky driving behavior scores. Logistic regression models were constructed to investigate the likelihood of an evasive maneuver given driver age, event severity, and the presence of driving anger. Results: Findings showed that teen drivers (ages 16–19) and young drivers (ages 20–29) were more likely to take evasive maneuvers in response to safety-critical events (i.e., near-crash and crash events) compared to middle-aged drivers. There was an interaction between event severity and driving anger presence; angry drivers were less likely to perform evasive maneuvers in near-crash events compared to non-impaired drivers. Among events with evasive maneuver present, anger was associated with comparable likelihood of braking, but reduced likelihood of combined braking-and-steering maneuvers compared to no impairment. Conclusions: The findings demonstrate that driving anger alters both the likelihood and structure of evasive responses in safety-critical situations, particularly in less severe but time-sensitive conflicts. Practical Applications: Our findings can inform the design of in-vehicle driver monitoring and alert systems and active safety technologies aimed at mitigating the risk of “no avoidance maneuver” behavior under heightened emotional states.
驾驶愤怒减少了在接近撞车事件中逃避反应的可能性:来自SHRP 2自然驾驶研究的见解
导读:愤怒是一种普遍存在的情绪,已被证明会对驾驶行为产生负面影响,导致攻击性驾驶和路怒症——这两种情绪都是众所周知的交通安全威胁。本研究使用自然驾驶数据,调查了驾驶愤怒对撞车前和临近撞车时的规避操作的影响,特别关注情绪状态与事件严重程度的相互作用。方法:本研究采用第二战略公路研究计划(SHRP 2)自然驾驶研究(NDS)的数据,采用个案队列法评估愤怒对驾驶员交通冲突反应的影响。进行关联分析以评估驾驶愤怒与其他危险因素之间的关系,包括驾驶员年龄、性别和危险驾驶行为得分。我们构建了逻辑回归模型来调查在给定驾驶员年龄、事件严重程度和驾驶愤怒的情况下规避操作的可能性。结果:研究结果表明,与中年司机相比,青少年司机(16-19岁)和年轻司机(20-29岁)更有可能在应对安全关键事件(即接近碰撞和碰撞事件)时采取规避动作。事件严重程度与驱动愤怒存在交互作用;与未受损的司机相比,愤怒的司机在接近撞车的情况下不太可能采取躲避动作。在存在规避操作的事件中,愤怒与制动的可能性相关,但与无损伤相比,制动和转向联合操作的可能性降低。结论:研究结果表明,在安全关键的情况下,驾驶愤怒改变了逃避反应的可能性和结构,特别是在不太严重但时间敏感的冲突中。实际应用:我们的研究结果可以为车内驾驶员监控和警报系统以及主动安全技术的设计提供信息,旨在降低情绪状态下“无回避机动”行为的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
4.90%
发文量
174
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Safety Research is an interdisciplinary publication that provides for the exchange of ideas and scientific evidence capturing studies through research in all areas of safety and health, including traffic, workplace, home, and community. This forum invites research using rigorous methodologies, encourages translational research, and engages the global scientific community through various partnerships (e.g., this outreach includes highlighting some of the latest findings from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书