Pharmacological Treatment of Olfactory Reference Disorder: A Systematic Review and Historical Analysis of Treatment Patterns.

IF 3.8 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Ligia M Fonseca, Verônica Hühne, Murilo Branco, Inês M Salles-Fonseca, Gabriela B de Menezesa, Leonardo F Fontenelle
{"title":"Pharmacological Treatment of Olfactory Reference Disorder: A Systematic Review and Historical Analysis of Treatment Patterns.","authors":"Ligia M Fonseca, Verônica Hühne, Murilo Branco, Inês M Salles-Fonseca, Gabriela B de Menezesa, Leonardo F Fontenelle","doi":"10.36131/cnfioritieditore20260402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>olfactory Reference Disorder (ORD) is characterized by a persistent preoccupation with the belief of emitting a bad or unpleasant body odor or breath, which is either imperceptible or only minimally perceptible to others. To systematically review studies investigating the pharmacological treatment of Olfactory Reference Disorder (ORD) and explore clinical characteristics, treatment response, and historical changes in pharmacological prescribing patterns.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>systematic review conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Sociodemographic, clinical, phenomenological, and therapeutic variables were extracted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>fifty-two studies (47 case reports, 5 case series, and no controlled clinical trials), totaling 87 patients, were included. Treatment included serotonin reuptake inhibitors in 59.8%, antipsychotics in 52.9%, and both in 22% of cases. The overall treatment response rate was 86.2%, although interpretation is limited by uncontrolled study designs and probable publication bias. A historical analysis revealed that antipsychotics were more frequently prescribed in earlier reports, whereas SRIs became widely used only after the 1990s, reflecting a shift in the conceptualization of ORD toward the obsessive-compulsive spectrum. Also, no statistically significant differences were observed between responders and non-responders regarding sex, illness duration, psychiatric comorbidities, treatment modality, or pharmacological class used. Evidence of publication bias was identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ORD appears to be a potentially treatable condition, although the available evidence is limited by uncontrolled study designs, heterogeneous outcome measures, and probable publication bias. The shift toward serotonergic treatments parallels the evolving understanding of ORD within the obsessive-compulsive spectrum. Prospective studies using standardized outcome measures are needed..</p>","PeriodicalId":46700,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neuropsychiatry","volume":"23 4","pages":"318-325"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13519273/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neuropsychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36131/cnfioritieditore20260402","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: olfactory Reference Disorder (ORD) is characterized by a persistent preoccupation with the belief of emitting a bad or unpleasant body odor or breath, which is either imperceptible or only minimally perceptible to others. To systematically review studies investigating the pharmacological treatment of Olfactory Reference Disorder (ORD) and explore clinical characteristics, treatment response, and historical changes in pharmacological prescribing patterns.

Method: systematic review conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Sociodemographic, clinical, phenomenological, and therapeutic variables were extracted.

Results: fifty-two studies (47 case reports, 5 case series, and no controlled clinical trials), totaling 87 patients, were included. Treatment included serotonin reuptake inhibitors in 59.8%, antipsychotics in 52.9%, and both in 22% of cases. The overall treatment response rate was 86.2%, although interpretation is limited by uncontrolled study designs and probable publication bias. A historical analysis revealed that antipsychotics were more frequently prescribed in earlier reports, whereas SRIs became widely used only after the 1990s, reflecting a shift in the conceptualization of ORD toward the obsessive-compulsive spectrum. Also, no statistically significant differences were observed between responders and non-responders regarding sex, illness duration, psychiatric comorbidities, treatment modality, or pharmacological class used. Evidence of publication bias was identified.

Conclusions: ORD appears to be a potentially treatable condition, although the available evidence is limited by uncontrolled study designs, heterogeneous outcome measures, and probable publication bias. The shift toward serotonergic treatments parallels the evolving understanding of ORD within the obsessive-compulsive spectrum. Prospective studies using standardized outcome measures are needed..

嗅觉参照障碍的药物治疗:治疗模式的系统回顾和历史分析。
目的:嗅觉参照障碍(ORD)的特征是持续专注于发出难闻或令人不快的体味或呼吸的信念,这对他人来说要么是难以察觉的,要么是只有最低限度的感知。系统回顾有关嗅觉参考障碍(嗅觉参考障碍)药物治疗的研究,探讨嗅觉参考障碍的临床特点、治疗反应和药物处方模式的历史变化。方法:按照PRISMA指南进行系统评价。提取了社会人口学、临床、现象学和治疗变量。结果:纳入52项研究(47例病例报告,5个病例系列,无对照临床试验),共87例患者。治疗包括59.8%的5 -羟色胺再摄取抑制剂,52.9%的抗精神病药物,22%的病例两者都使用。总体治疗反应率为86.2%,但解释受到非受控研究设计和可能的发表偏倚的限制。一项历史分析显示,在早期的报告中,抗精神病药物的处方更为频繁,而SRIs在20世纪90年代之后才被广泛使用,这反映了ORD概念向强迫症谱系的转变。此外,在性别、病程、精神合并症、治疗方式或使用的药物类别方面,反应者和无反应者之间没有统计学上的显著差异。发现了发表偏倚的证据。结论:ORD似乎是一种潜在的可治疗的疾病,尽管现有的证据受到非受控研究设计、异质性结果测量和可能的发表偏倚的限制。向5 -羟色胺能治疗的转变与强迫症谱系中对ORD的不断发展的理解相一致。需要使用标准化结果测量的前瞻性研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Neuropsychiatry
Clinical Neuropsychiatry CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
1.60%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书