Validation of CPS+EG Staging System in a Cohort of Eastern Indian Breast Cancer Patients.

IF 0.7 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology Pub Date : 2026-08-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-03 DOI:10.1007/s13193-025-02502-6
Sravya Deepika Ganti, Priyansh Jain, Priyanka Saha, Ephraim Rebba, Vigneshwaran B, Imaduddin Mohammed, Saroj Kumar Das Majumdar, Sandip Barik, Deepak Das, Ilavarasi V, Sourav K Misra, Mukund N Sable, Pritinanda Misra, Biswajit Sahoo, Mahesh Sultania, Sudhakar G, Phanindra K Swain, Madhabananda Kar, Dillip Kumar Muduly
{"title":"Validation of CPS+EG Staging System in a Cohort of Eastern Indian Breast Cancer Patients.","authors":"Sravya Deepika Ganti, Priyansh Jain, Priyanka Saha, Ephraim Rebba, Vigneshwaran B, Imaduddin Mohammed, Saroj Kumar Das Majumdar, Sandip Barik, Deepak Das, Ilavarasi V, Sourav K Misra, Mukund N Sable, Pritinanda Misra, Biswajit Sahoo, Mahesh Sultania, Sudhakar G, Phanindra K Swain, Madhabananda Kar, Dillip Kumar Muduly","doi":"10.1007/s13193-025-02502-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) has become standard for locally advanced breast cancer (LABC), offering opportunities for tailored treatment and improved survival. However, current staging systems fail to incorporate treatment response into prognosis. The CPS+EG staging system presents a novel approach, integrating clinical and pathological stages with ER status and nuclear grade. While validated in Western cohorts, its applicability in Indian patients remains unexplored. This study aimed to validate CPS+EG in an Eastern Indian cohort (<i>n</i>=208) treated with NACT. A retrospective analysis of data from 2016 to 2023 was done. The CPS+EG scores for all the eligible patients were calculated. Clinicopathologic characteristics and patient outcomes were assessed. The discrimination of CPS+EG and CS was assessed using the area under the curve (AUC) for survival data, calculated using Receiver operating time (ROC) curves. CPS+EG effectively stratified patients, with higher scores correlating with poorer outcomes. Median follow-up was 24 months, with 22.1% recurrence and 16.3% mortality. Five-year overall survival (OS) was 67%, and disease-free survival (DFS) 39.3%. The 5-year DFS for CPS+EG scores 1-5 was 50%, 75%, 58.3%, 44.3%, and 37.9%, respectively. None of the patients with a score of 6 survived for 5 years. CPS+EG outperformed CS alone, with AUCs of 0.75 (OS) and 0.73 (DFS) versus 0.57 and 0.58, respectively. This study fills a literature gap by validating CPS+EG in Eastern Indian patients, highlighting its utility in the prognostication of post-NACT patients. CPS+EG offers a simple yet effective, promising tool for personalized prognosis, warranting further investigation and clinical integration.</p>","PeriodicalId":46707,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":"17 8","pages":"1861-1868"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13518640/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13193-025-02502-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) has become standard for locally advanced breast cancer (LABC), offering opportunities for tailored treatment and improved survival. However, current staging systems fail to incorporate treatment response into prognosis. The CPS+EG staging system presents a novel approach, integrating clinical and pathological stages with ER status and nuclear grade. While validated in Western cohorts, its applicability in Indian patients remains unexplored. This study aimed to validate CPS+EG in an Eastern Indian cohort (n=208) treated with NACT. A retrospective analysis of data from 2016 to 2023 was done. The CPS+EG scores for all the eligible patients were calculated. Clinicopathologic characteristics and patient outcomes were assessed. The discrimination of CPS+EG and CS was assessed using the area under the curve (AUC) for survival data, calculated using Receiver operating time (ROC) curves. CPS+EG effectively stratified patients, with higher scores correlating with poorer outcomes. Median follow-up was 24 months, with 22.1% recurrence and 16.3% mortality. Five-year overall survival (OS) was 67%, and disease-free survival (DFS) 39.3%. The 5-year DFS for CPS+EG scores 1-5 was 50%, 75%, 58.3%, 44.3%, and 37.9%, respectively. None of the patients with a score of 6 survived for 5 years. CPS+EG outperformed CS alone, with AUCs of 0.75 (OS) and 0.73 (DFS) versus 0.57 and 0.58, respectively. This study fills a literature gap by validating CPS+EG in Eastern Indian patients, highlighting its utility in the prognostication of post-NACT patients. CPS+EG offers a simple yet effective, promising tool for personalized prognosis, warranting further investigation and clinical integration.

在东印度乳腺癌患者队列中验证CPS+EG分期系统。
新辅助化疗(NACT)已成为局部晚期乳腺癌(LABC)的标准,为量身定制的治疗和提高生存率提供了机会。然而,目前的分期系统未能将治疗反应纳入预后。CPS+EG分期系统提出了一种新颖的方法,将临床和病理分期与ER状态和核分级相结合。虽然在西方人群中得到了验证,但其在印度患者中的适用性仍未得到探索。本研究旨在验证接受NACT治疗的东印度队列(n=208)的CPS+EG。对2016年至2023年的数据进行回顾性分析。计算所有符合条件的患者的CPS+EG评分。评估临床病理特征和患者预后。使用生存数据的曲线下面积(AUC)评估CPS+EG和CS的区分,使用受试者工作时间(ROC)曲线计算。CPS+EG有效地将患者分层,得分越高,预后越差。中位随访24个月,复发率为22.1%,死亡率为16.3%。5年总生存率(OS)为67%,无病生存率(DFS)为39.3%。CPS+EG评分1-5的5年DFS分别为50%、75%、58.3%、44.3%和37.9%。得分为6分的患者没有一个活过5年。CPS+EG优于单独CS, auc分别为0.75 (OS)和0.73 (DFS),而auc分别为0.57和0.58。本研究通过验证东印度患者的CPS+EG填补了文献空白,强调了其在nact后患者预后中的应用。CPS+EG为个性化预后提供了简单有效、有前景的工具,值得进一步研究和临床整合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
190
期刊介绍: The Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology aims to encourage and promote clinical and research activities pertaining to Surgical Oncology. It also aims to bring in the concept of multidisciplinary team approach in management of various cancers. The Journal would publish original article, point of technique, review article, case report, letter to editor, profiles of eminent teachers, surgeons and instititions - a short (up to 500 words) of the Cancer Institutions, departments, and oncologist, who founded new departments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书