Correction to "The spontaneous prioritization of 'unfinishedness' in perception: A visual Zeigarnik effect" by Ongchoco et al. (2026).

IF 3.7 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Joan Danielle K Ongchoco, Kimberly W Wong, Brian J Scholl
{"title":"Correction to \"The spontaneous prioritization of 'unfinishedness' in perception: A visual Zeigarnik effect\" by Ongchoco et al. (2026).","authors":"Joan Danielle K Ongchoco, Kimberly W Wong, Brian J Scholl","doi":"10.1037/xge0001989","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Reports an error in \"The spontaneous prioritization of \"unfinishedness\" in perception: A visual Zeigarnik effect\" by Joan Danielle K. Ongchoco, Kimberly W. Wong and Brian J. Scholl (<i>Journal of Experimental Psychology: General</i>, 2026[Mar], Vol 155[3], 649-655; see record 2027-10096-001). In the article \"The Spontaneous Prioritization of 'Unfinishedness' in Perception: A Visual Zeigarnik Effect\" by Joan Danielle K. Ongchoco, Kimberly W. Wong, and Brian J. Scholl (Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 2026, Vol. 155, No. 3, pp. 649-655. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001884), there was a coding bug in the shuffling function. As a result,the individual mazes were not randomly ordered or counterbalanced across conditions, as was stated in the paper. (The following abstract of the original article appeared in record 2027-10096-001.) The events that occupy our thoughts in an especially persistent way are often those that are unfinished-from half-written papers to unfolded laundry. These events seem to also be privileged in memory, as in the \"Zeigarnik effect\": When people carry out various tasks, but some are never finished due to extrinsic interruptions, memory tends to be better for those tasks that were unfinished. But just how foundational is this sort of \"unfinishedness\" in mental life? The Zeigarnik effect is often explained by appeal to the salience of goals or the weight of obligation, but might unfinishedness also be spontaneously prioritized even in visual processing-independent of these high-level social/motivational factors? Across four experiments (<i>N</i> = 120), observers viewed paths that gradually unfolded through mazes, from a start point to an end point. Probes briefly appeared along the path, and observers later simply reproduced their positions. Critically, each path either reached its end point or stopped shortly before-remaining visually unfinished. Although this manipulation was entirely task-irrelevant, it greatly influenced performance-with more precise reproductions on unfinished trials. This same pattern held across multiple experiments, even while carefully controlling for various lower level visual properties, and it generalized across different types of displays. This new <i>visual Zeigarnik effect</i> shows how vision extracts an unexpectedly rich property that is usually associated with higher level thought, and how the unfinishedness of events is privileged in the mind at a deep level. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":15698,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology: General","volume":"155 9","pages":"2160"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Psychology: General","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001989","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reports an error in "The spontaneous prioritization of "unfinishedness" in perception: A visual Zeigarnik effect" by Joan Danielle K. Ongchoco, Kimberly W. Wong and Brian J. Scholl (Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 2026[Mar], Vol 155[3], 649-655; see record 2027-10096-001). In the article "The Spontaneous Prioritization of 'Unfinishedness' in Perception: A Visual Zeigarnik Effect" by Joan Danielle K. Ongchoco, Kimberly W. Wong, and Brian J. Scholl (Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 2026, Vol. 155, No. 3, pp. 649-655. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001884), there was a coding bug in the shuffling function. As a result,the individual mazes were not randomly ordered or counterbalanced across conditions, as was stated in the paper. (The following abstract of the original article appeared in record 2027-10096-001.) The events that occupy our thoughts in an especially persistent way are often those that are unfinished-from half-written papers to unfolded laundry. These events seem to also be privileged in memory, as in the "Zeigarnik effect": When people carry out various tasks, but some are never finished due to extrinsic interruptions, memory tends to be better for those tasks that were unfinished. But just how foundational is this sort of "unfinishedness" in mental life? The Zeigarnik effect is often explained by appeal to the salience of goals or the weight of obligation, but might unfinishedness also be spontaneously prioritized even in visual processing-independent of these high-level social/motivational factors? Across four experiments (N = 120), observers viewed paths that gradually unfolded through mazes, from a start point to an end point. Probes briefly appeared along the path, and observers later simply reproduced their positions. Critically, each path either reached its end point or stopped shortly before-remaining visually unfinished. Although this manipulation was entirely task-irrelevant, it greatly influenced performance-with more precise reproductions on unfinished trials. This same pattern held across multiple experiments, even while carefully controlling for various lower level visual properties, and it generalized across different types of displays. This new visual Zeigarnik effect shows how vision extracts an unexpectedly rich property that is usually associated with higher level thought, and how the unfinishedness of events is privileged in the mind at a deep level. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).

对Ongchoco等人(2026)的“感知中‘未完成’的自发优先级:视觉蔡加尼克效应”的更正。
Joan Danielle K. Ongchoco, Kimberly W. Wong和Brian J. Scholl的“感知中“未完成”的自发优先级:视觉蔡格尼克效应”报告中的错误(实验心理学杂志:综合,2026[Mar], Vol 155 bbb, 649-655;见记录2027-10096-001)。琼·丹妮尔·K. Ongchoco、金伯利·W. Wong和布莱恩·J.肖尔合著的文章《感知中“未完成”的自发优先排序:视觉蔡格尼克效应》(《实验心理学杂志:综合》,2026年,第155卷,第3期,第649-655页)。https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001884),在洗牌功能中有一个编码错误。因此,正如论文中所述,单个迷宫在不同条件下并不是随机排序或平衡的。(原文摘要见记录2027-10096-001)那些以一种特别持久的方式占据我们思想的事件往往是那些未完成的事情——从写了一半的论文到打开的衣服。这些事件似乎在记忆中也享有特权,就像“蔡格尼克效应”一样:当人们执行各种任务,但有些任务由于外部干扰而从未完成时,对那些未完成的任务的记忆往往更好。但这种“未完成”在精神生活中到底有多重要呢?蔡格尼克效应通常被解释为对目标的突出性或义务的重要性的吸引力,但是,即使在视觉处理中,未完成的事情是否也会自发地优先考虑——独立于这些高级社会/动机因素?在四个实验中(N = 120),观察者观察从起点到终点逐渐展开的迷宫路径。探测器在路径上短暂出现,观察者随后简单地复制了它们的位置。关键的是,每条路径要么到达终点,要么很快就停止了——在视觉上仍然未完成。尽管这种操作完全与任务无关,但它极大地影响了性能——在未完成的试验中进行了更精确的复制。即使在仔细控制各种较低层次视觉属性的情况下,同样的模式在多个实验中都成立,并且在不同类型的显示中也得到了推广。这种新的视觉蔡格尼克效应表明,视觉是如何提取出一种通常与高层次思维有关的意想不到的丰富属性的,以及事件的未完成是如何在深层次的思维中享有特权的。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2026 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.90%
发文量
300
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experimental Psychology: General publishes articles describing empirical work that bridges the traditional interests of two or more communities of psychology. The work may touch on issues dealt with in JEP: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, JEP: Human Perception and Performance, JEP: Animal Behavior Processes, or JEP: Applied, but may also concern issues in other subdisciplines of psychology, including social processes, developmental processes, psychopathology, neuroscience, or computational modeling. Articles in JEP: General may be longer than the usual journal publication if necessary, but shorter articles that bridge subdisciplines will also be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书