{"title":"Direct immunofluorescence in the clinic for pemphigus and pemphigoid diseases.","authors":"Hua Qian, Yuguang Zhao, Mako Mine, Xiaoguang Li, Takashi Hashimoto","doi":"10.1080/1744666X.2026.2724860","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Direct immunofluorescence (DIF) is a cornerstone diagnostic tool for autoimmune bullous diseases (AIBDs), providing critical tissue-based visualization of immune deposits.</p><p><strong>Area covered: </strong>Literatures were searched using Pubmed with DIF and pemphigus or pemphigoid or AIBD as keywords before 20 December 2025. This review details the role of DIF in the diagnoses of AIBDs, both pemphigus and pemphigoid diseases, highlighting characteristic staining patterns. Pemphigus diseases show IgG/IgA/C3 depositions to keratinocyte cell surfaces, while pemphigoid diseases exhibit linear/granular basement membrane zone depositions of various immunoglobulins and complement components. DIF results are usually consistent with H&E pathological results, intraepidermal blisters for pemphigus diseases and subepidermal blisters for pemphigoid diseases. DIF findings are distinct in some subtypes of AIBDs, guiding differential diagnosis and complementing serological assays, such as indirect immunofluorescence, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays and immunoblotting.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>DIF remains the diagnostic gold standard for AIBDs, providing indispensable tissue-specific insights, that cannot be fully replaced by serological tests. However, serological tests are more important in monitoring disease activity. Thus, when biopsy is impractical, optimal diagnosis requires synergistic use of both DIF and serological tests.</p>","PeriodicalId":12175,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Clinical Immunology","volume":" ","pages":"915-928"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Clinical Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1744666X.2026.2724860","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Direct immunofluorescence (DIF) is a cornerstone diagnostic tool for autoimmune bullous diseases (AIBDs), providing critical tissue-based visualization of immune deposits.
Area covered: Literatures were searched using Pubmed with DIF and pemphigus or pemphigoid or AIBD as keywords before 20 December 2025. This review details the role of DIF in the diagnoses of AIBDs, both pemphigus and pemphigoid diseases, highlighting characteristic staining patterns. Pemphigus diseases show IgG/IgA/C3 depositions to keratinocyte cell surfaces, while pemphigoid diseases exhibit linear/granular basement membrane zone depositions of various immunoglobulins and complement components. DIF results are usually consistent with H&E pathological results, intraepidermal blisters for pemphigus diseases and subepidermal blisters for pemphigoid diseases. DIF findings are distinct in some subtypes of AIBDs, guiding differential diagnosis and complementing serological assays, such as indirect immunofluorescence, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays and immunoblotting.
Expert opinion: DIF remains the diagnostic gold standard for AIBDs, providing indispensable tissue-specific insights, that cannot be fully replaced by serological tests. However, serological tests are more important in monitoring disease activity. Thus, when biopsy is impractical, optimal diagnosis requires synergistic use of both DIF and serological tests.
期刊介绍:
Expert Review of Clinical Immunology (ISSN 1744-666X) provides expert analysis and commentary regarding the performance of new therapeutic and diagnostic modalities in clinical immunology. Members of the International Editorial Advisory Panel of Expert Review of Clinical Immunology are the forefront of their area of expertise. This panel works with our dedicated editorial team to identify the most important and topical review themes and the corresponding expert(s) most appropriate to provide commentary and analysis. All articles are subject to rigorous peer-review, and the finished reviews provide an essential contribution to decision-making in clinical immunology.
Articles focus on the following key areas:
• Therapeutic overviews of specific immunologic disorders highlighting optimal therapy and prospects for new medicines
• Performance and benefits of newly approved therapeutic agents
• New diagnostic approaches
• Screening and patient stratification
• Pharmacoeconomic studies
• New therapeutic indications for existing therapies
• Adverse effects, occurrence and reduction
• Prospects for medicines in late-stage trials approaching regulatory approval
• Novel treatment strategies
• Epidemiological studies
• Commentary and comparison of treatment guidelines
Topics include infection and immunity, inflammation, host defense mechanisms, congenital and acquired immunodeficiencies, anaphylaxis and allergy, systemic immune diseases, organ-specific inflammatory diseases, transplantation immunology, endocrinology and diabetes, cancer immunology, neuroimmunology and hematological diseases.