Anatomical Comparative Study of Cutaneous Nerve Injury Risk in Minimally Invasive Calcaneal Osteotomy: Four-Quadrant Sliding Osteotomy vs the Rising Sun Technique.

Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics Pub Date : 2026-08-24 eCollection Date: 2026-07-01 DOI:10.1177/24730114261471429
Constantin Rump, Juliane Beschauner, Felix Werneburg, Maria Felsberg, Raoul Werner, Heike Kielstein, Karl-Stefan Delank, Natalia Gutteck
{"title":"Anatomical Comparative Study of Cutaneous Nerve Injury Risk in Minimally Invasive Calcaneal Osteotomy: Four-Quadrant Sliding Osteotomy vs the Rising Sun Technique.","authors":"Constantin Rump, Juliane Beschauner, Felix Werneburg, Maria Felsberg, Raoul Werner, Heike Kielstein, Karl-Stefan Delank, Natalia Gutteck","doi":"10.1177/24730114261471429","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Calcaneal osteotomy plays a central role in the correction of hindfoot axis deformities, with minimally invasive techniques becoming increasingly established in recent years. For minimally invasive calcaneal osteotomy (MICO), V-shaped osteotomy and the 4-quadrant sliding osteotomy (4Q) are widely used techniques. Toepfer et al recently introduced the so-called rising sun (RS) technique for MICO. In this surgical technique, perforating drillings are performed instead of a sliding osteotomy. The present cadaveric study aimed to compare the risk of cutaneous nerve injury between the RS technique and the established 4Q technique.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 24 human anatomical specimens were used. Eight specimens underwent osteotomy using the 4Q technique. In 16 specimens, the RS technique was performed. Allocation was randomized. Subsequently, the cutaneous nerves of the foot were dissected and stained. The osteotomy plane was then exposed, distances to the dissected nerves were measured using standardized methods. All nerve injuries were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the osteotomies performed using the 4Q technique, nerve injury occurred in 6 of 45 evaluable nerves (13.3 %). In the osteotomies performed using the RS technique, a total of 3 nerve injuries were identified in the anatomical dissections of 90 evaluable nerves (3.3%). A statistically significant difference was not found (<i>P</i> = .06). The lateral dorsal cutaneous nerve was the most frequently injured nerve with a total of 4 lesions (44.4%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The new RS technique appears to be a safe method for MICO; however, based on the available numbers, no statistically significant difference in nerve injury rates between the 2 techniques was detected. Complete avoidance of nerve injury does not seem achievable with percutaneous techniques. Further studies, especially in clinically evaluable patients, are desirable to better assess this technique and its potential for broader clinical application.</p>","PeriodicalId":12429,"journal":{"name":"Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics","volume":"11 3","pages":"24730114261471429"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13519172/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/24730114261471429","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Calcaneal osteotomy plays a central role in the correction of hindfoot axis deformities, with minimally invasive techniques becoming increasingly established in recent years. For minimally invasive calcaneal osteotomy (MICO), V-shaped osteotomy and the 4-quadrant sliding osteotomy (4Q) are widely used techniques. Toepfer et al recently introduced the so-called rising sun (RS) technique for MICO. In this surgical technique, perforating drillings are performed instead of a sliding osteotomy. The present cadaveric study aimed to compare the risk of cutaneous nerve injury between the RS technique and the established 4Q technique.

Methods: A total of 24 human anatomical specimens were used. Eight specimens underwent osteotomy using the 4Q technique. In 16 specimens, the RS technique was performed. Allocation was randomized. Subsequently, the cutaneous nerves of the foot were dissected and stained. The osteotomy plane was then exposed, distances to the dissected nerves were measured using standardized methods. All nerve injuries were recorded.

Results: In the osteotomies performed using the 4Q technique, nerve injury occurred in 6 of 45 evaluable nerves (13.3 %). In the osteotomies performed using the RS technique, a total of 3 nerve injuries were identified in the anatomical dissections of 90 evaluable nerves (3.3%). A statistically significant difference was not found (P = .06). The lateral dorsal cutaneous nerve was the most frequently injured nerve with a total of 4 lesions (44.4%).

Conclusion: The new RS technique appears to be a safe method for MICO; however, based on the available numbers, no statistically significant difference in nerve injury rates between the 2 techniques was detected. Complete avoidance of nerve injury does not seem achievable with percutaneous techniques. Further studies, especially in clinically evaluable patients, are desirable to better assess this technique and its potential for broader clinical application.

微创跟骨截骨术中皮神经损伤风险的解剖学比较研究:四象限滑动截骨术与旭日术。
背景:跟骨截骨术在后足轴畸形的矫正中起着核心作用,近年来微创技术越来越成熟。微创跟骨截骨术(MICO)中,v形截骨术和四象限滑动截骨术(4Q)被广泛应用。Toepfer等人最近介绍了所谓的MICO旭日(RS)技术。在这种手术技术中,穿孔钻孔代替滑动截骨。目前的尸体研究旨在比较RS技术和现有的4Q技术对皮神经损伤的风险。方法:采用人体解剖标本24例。8例标本采用4Q技术截骨。在16个标本中,采用RS技术。随机分配。随后,解剖足部皮神经并染色。然后暴露截骨平面,使用标准化方法测量与解剖神经的距离。记录所有神经损伤。结果:在采用4Q技术进行的截骨术中,45条可评估神经中有6条(13.3%)发生神经损伤。在采用RS技术进行的截骨术中,在90条可评估神经的解剖解剖中,共发现3条神经损伤(3.3%)。差异无统计学意义(P = 0.06)。外侧背皮神经损伤最多,共4例(44.4%)。结论:RS技术是一种安全的微创手术方法;然而,根据现有的数据,两种技术之间的神经损伤率没有统计学意义上的差异。经皮穿刺技术似乎无法完全避免神经损伤。进一步的研究,特别是在临床可评估的患者,是可取的,以更好地评估该技术及其潜在的更广泛的临床应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics
Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1152
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书