A systematic framework for ecological restoration of degraded grasslands: Theoretical integration, technological combination, and efficiency assessment.

Q3 Environmental Science
Hui-Qun Huang, Xiao-Ya Chen, Xi-Yuan Liu, Xiao-Hua Zhu, He-Ping Zeng
{"title":"A systematic framework for ecological restoration of degraded grasslands: Theoretical integration, technological combination, and efficiency assessment.","authors":"Hui-Qun Huang, Xiao-Ya Chen, Xi-Yuan Liu, Xiao-Hua Zhu, He-Ping Zeng","doi":"10.13287/j.1001-9332.202607.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Grassland degradation has become a critical constraint on regional ecological functions and the sustainable development of pastoral systems in China. To address key challenges in restoration practices, including fragmented measures, mismatches between technologies and degradation types, and the overemphasis on construction over long-term management, we developed a systematic grassland restoration framework based on systematic restoration theory, integrating the concepts of Nature-based Solutions (NbS) and near-natural restoration. The framework centered on degradation diagnosis and the identification of dominant limiting factor, and integrated key technology configuration, engineering equipment matching, multidimensional benefit evaluation, and feedback optimization into a closed-loop decision-making pathway of \"diagnosis-configuration-evaluation-regulation\". By introducing an \"ecological state assessment-pathway differentiation\" mechanism, the restoration process was transformed from a linear implementation model into a dynamic optimization process, thereby overcoming the infinite-loop limitations of conventional restoration approaches. Restoration effectiveness depended on the precise matching between limiting factors and technology combinations rather than on single techniques or intervention intensity. Multidimensional bene-fit evaluation should be embedded during restoration as a key driver of adaptive management. The proposed framework achieved the systematic integration of restoration theory, technical pathways, efficiency assessment, and mana-gement regulation, providing support for precise decision-making and long-term regulation of grassland restoration under different degradation scenarios in China.</p>","PeriodicalId":35942,"journal":{"name":"应用生态学报","volume":"37 7","pages":"2424-2440"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"应用生态学报","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13287/j.1001-9332.202607.008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Grassland degradation has become a critical constraint on regional ecological functions and the sustainable development of pastoral systems in China. To address key challenges in restoration practices, including fragmented measures, mismatches between technologies and degradation types, and the overemphasis on construction over long-term management, we developed a systematic grassland restoration framework based on systematic restoration theory, integrating the concepts of Nature-based Solutions (NbS) and near-natural restoration. The framework centered on degradation diagnosis and the identification of dominant limiting factor, and integrated key technology configuration, engineering equipment matching, multidimensional benefit evaluation, and feedback optimization into a closed-loop decision-making pathway of "diagnosis-configuration-evaluation-regulation". By introducing an "ecological state assessment-pathway differentiation" mechanism, the restoration process was transformed from a linear implementation model into a dynamic optimization process, thereby overcoming the infinite-loop limitations of conventional restoration approaches. Restoration effectiveness depended on the precise matching between limiting factors and technology combinations rather than on single techniques or intervention intensity. Multidimensional bene-fit evaluation should be embedded during restoration as a key driver of adaptive management. The proposed framework achieved the systematic integration of restoration theory, technical pathways, efficiency assessment, and mana-gement regulation, providing support for precise decision-making and long-term regulation of grassland restoration under different degradation scenarios in China.

退化草原生态恢复的系统框架:理论整合、技术组合与效率评价。
草地退化已成为制约中国区域生态功能和牧区系统可持续发展的重要因素。针对草地恢复实践中存在的措施碎片化、技术与退化类型不匹配、建设重于长期管理等主要问题,基于系统恢复理论,将基于自然的解决方案(natural -based Solutions, NbS)和近自然恢复(near-natural restoration)的概念相结合,构建了草地恢复系统框架。该框架以退化诊断和优势限制因子识别为核心,将关键技术配置、工程装备匹配、多维效益评价、反馈优化等集成为“诊断-配置-评价-调控”的闭环决策路径。通过引入“生态状态评价-路径分化”机制,将恢复过程从线性实施模型转变为动态优化过程,克服了传统恢复方法的无限循环局限性。恢复效果取决于限制因素和技术组合的精确匹配,而不是单一的技术或干预强度。在恢复过程中应嵌入多维效益评价,作为适应性管理的关键驱动力。该框架实现了恢复理论、技术路径、效率评价和管理调控的系统整合,为中国不同退化情景下草地恢复的精准决策和长期调控提供支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
应用生态学报
应用生态学报 Environmental Science-Ecology
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11393
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书