Predictive Power of Pulmonary Artery Stiffness - Right Ventricular Interplay, but not Pulmonary Vascular Resistance, in Mild Pulmonary Hypertension: A PVRI GoDeep meta-registry analysis.

IF 9.8 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Chest Pub Date : 2026-08-26 DOI:10.1016/j.chest.2026.07.5243
Athiththan Yogeswaran, Meike Fünderich, David G Kiely, Jeffrey S Annis, Evan Brittain, Harm Jan Bogaard, Aparna Balasubramanian, Paul M Hassoun, Luke Howard, Allan Lawrie, Martin R Wilkins, Thenappan Thenappan, Jean Elwing, Arun Jose, Mona Lichtblau, Silvia Ulrich, Lars Harbaum, Hans Klose, Andrew J Sweatt, Roham T Zamanian, Edmund M Lau, Keiichiro Kuronuma, Hiromi Matsubara, Nathan Dwyer, Yuriy Sirenko, Olena Torbas, Christina A Eichstaedt, Ekkehard Grünig, Melanie Lavender, Alexandra Arvanitaki, George Giannakoulas, Marlize Frauendorf, Paul G Williams, Zhenguo Zhai, Zhu Zhang, Anastasia Anthi, Effrosyni Dima, Hani Sabbour, Khaled Saleh, Stefano Ghio, Laura Scelsi, Juliana De Luque Figueroa, Mauricio Orozco-Levi, Alba Ramirez-Sarmiento, Siva Sivakumaran, James Anderson, Stephen Y Chan, Ingrid King, Horst Olschewski, Hossein-Ardeschir Ghofrani, Friedrich Grimminger, Raphael W Majeed, Jochen Wilhelm, Khodr Tello, Werner Seeger
{"title":"Predictive Power of Pulmonary Artery Stiffness - Right Ventricular Interplay, but not Pulmonary Vascular Resistance, in Mild Pulmonary Hypertension: A PVRI GoDeep meta-registry analysis.","authors":"Athiththan Yogeswaran, Meike Fünderich, David G Kiely, Jeffrey S Annis, Evan Brittain, Harm Jan Bogaard, Aparna Balasubramanian, Paul M Hassoun, Luke Howard, Allan Lawrie, Martin R Wilkins, Thenappan Thenappan, Jean Elwing, Arun Jose, Mona Lichtblau, Silvia Ulrich, Lars Harbaum, Hans Klose, Andrew J Sweatt, Roham T Zamanian, Edmund M Lau, Keiichiro Kuronuma, Hiromi Matsubara, Nathan Dwyer, Yuriy Sirenko, Olena Torbas, Christina A Eichstaedt, Ekkehard Grünig, Melanie Lavender, Alexandra Arvanitaki, George Giannakoulas, Marlize Frauendorf, Paul G Williams, Zhenguo Zhai, Zhu Zhang, Anastasia Anthi, Effrosyni Dima, Hani Sabbour, Khaled Saleh, Stefano Ghio, Laura Scelsi, Juliana De Luque Figueroa, Mauricio Orozco-Levi, Alba Ramirez-Sarmiento, Siva Sivakumaran, James Anderson, Stephen Y Chan, Ingrid King, Horst Olschewski, Hossein-Ardeschir Ghofrani, Friedrich Grimminger, Raphael W Majeed, Jochen Wilhelm, Khodr Tello, Werner Seeger","doi":"10.1016/j.chest.2026.07.5243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pulmonary vascular diseases are characterized by mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR), both reflecting the steady-flow component of right ventricular (RV) afterload while neglecting pulsatile elements. Pulmonary artery compliance (PAC) and arterial elastance (E<sub>a</sub>) capture complementary aspects of pulmonary vascular load, whereas stroke volume index (SVI) reflects RV functional adaptation. The prognostic significance of these integrated parameters remains incompletely understood, particularly in early-stage disease.</p><p><strong>Research question: </strong>Do PAC, E<sub>a</sub>, and SVI predict mortality independently of PVR in patients with mild PH and across the full spectrum of pulmonary hypertension (PH)?</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the international PVRI GoDeep meta-registry, we first evaluated the prognostic relevance of PAC, E<sub>a</sub>, and SVI in patients with mild PH, defined as a mPAP >20 and <25 mmHg. Subsequently, these analyses were extended to the overall PH population across the full spectrum of disease severity. Subgroup analyses were performed according to PH etiology. PAC was calculated as the ratio of SV to pulmonary arterial pulse pressure, and E<sub>a</sub> as end-systolic pressure divided by SV.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In patients with mild PH (n = 1,097), neither mPAP nor PVR predicted mortality (both p>0.05). In contrast, E<sub>a</sub>, PAC, SVI, and heart rate demonstrated independent prognostic value. Expanding the analysis to 16,899 patients across PH groups 1-5, these parameters remained significantly associated with survival, independent of PVR/TPR and after adjustment for multiple potential confounders. Consistent findings were observed across etiological subgroups and IPAH/hPAH.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Parameters integrating pulsatile vascular load and interdependent RV function possess predictive power independent of PVR/TPR across the full spectrum of PH. Moreover, they allow meaningful risk stratification in mild PH patients, where conventional parameters lack discriminative prognostic power.</p>","PeriodicalId":9782,"journal":{"name":"Chest","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chest","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2026.07.5243","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pulmonary vascular diseases are characterized by mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR), both reflecting the steady-flow component of right ventricular (RV) afterload while neglecting pulsatile elements. Pulmonary artery compliance (PAC) and arterial elastance (Ea) capture complementary aspects of pulmonary vascular load, whereas stroke volume index (SVI) reflects RV functional adaptation. The prognostic significance of these integrated parameters remains incompletely understood, particularly in early-stage disease.

Research question: Do PAC, Ea, and SVI predict mortality independently of PVR in patients with mild PH and across the full spectrum of pulmonary hypertension (PH)?

Methods: Using the international PVRI GoDeep meta-registry, we first evaluated the prognostic relevance of PAC, Ea, and SVI in patients with mild PH, defined as a mPAP >20 and <25 mmHg. Subsequently, these analyses were extended to the overall PH population across the full spectrum of disease severity. Subgroup analyses were performed according to PH etiology. PAC was calculated as the ratio of SV to pulmonary arterial pulse pressure, and Ea as end-systolic pressure divided by SV.

Results: In patients with mild PH (n = 1,097), neither mPAP nor PVR predicted mortality (both p>0.05). In contrast, Ea, PAC, SVI, and heart rate demonstrated independent prognostic value. Expanding the analysis to 16,899 patients across PH groups 1-5, these parameters remained significantly associated with survival, independent of PVR/TPR and after adjustment for multiple potential confounders. Consistent findings were observed across etiological subgroups and IPAH/hPAH.

Interpretation: Parameters integrating pulsatile vascular load and interdependent RV function possess predictive power independent of PVR/TPR across the full spectrum of PH. Moreover, they allow meaningful risk stratification in mild PH patients, where conventional parameters lack discriminative prognostic power.

肺动脉僵硬-右心室相互作用的预测能力,而不是肺血管阻力,在轻度肺动脉高压:PVRI GoDeep meta登记分析。
背景:肺血管疾病的特征是平均肺动脉压(mPAP)和肺血管阻力(PVR),两者都反映了右心室(RV)负荷后的稳定血流成分,而忽略了脉动成分。肺动脉顺应性(PAC)和动脉弹性(Ea)反映了肺血管负荷的互补方面,而脑卒中容积指数(SVI)反映了右心室功能适应。这些综合参数的预后意义仍不完全清楚,特别是在早期疾病中。研究问题:PAC、Ea和SVI能否独立预测轻度PH和全谱肺动脉高压(PH)患者的PVR死亡率?方法:使用国际PVRI GoDeep meta-registry,我们首先评估轻度PH患者PAC、Ea和SVI的预后相关性,定义为mPAP bbb20和a为收缩压/ SV。结果:在轻度PH患者(n = 1097)中,mPAP和PVR均不能预测死亡率(p < 0.05)。相比之下,Ea、PAC、SVI和心率显示出独立的预后价值。将分析扩展到PH组1-5的16,899例患者,这些参数在对多个潜在混杂因素进行调整后,与PVR/TPR无关,仍然与生存率显著相关。在病因亚组和IPAH/hPAH之间观察到一致的结果。解释:综合脉动血管负荷和相互依赖的RV功能的参数在整个PH谱中具有独立于PVR/TPR的预测能力。此外,在常规参数缺乏鉴别预后能力的轻度PH患者中,它们允许有意义的风险分层。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Chest
Chest 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
3.10%
发文量
3369
审稿时长
15 days
期刊介绍: At CHEST, our mission is to revolutionize patient care through the collaboration of multidisciplinary clinicians in the fields of pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine. We achieve this by publishing cutting-edge clinical research that addresses current challenges and brings forth future advancements. To enhance understanding in a rapidly evolving field, CHEST also features review articles, commentaries, and facilitates discussions on emerging controversies. We place great emphasis on scientific rigor, employing a rigorous peer review process, and ensuring all accepted content is published online within two weeks.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书