Statistical power in UK genetic syndrome research; evidence from studies of Down syndrome, Fragile X syndrome and Williams syndrome as model syndrome groups.

IF 1.8 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Emily K Farran, Sophia Alexiou, Henrik Danielsson, Camilla Orefice, Laura Cristescu, Elizabeth Pellicano, Jo Van Herwegen, Gaia Scerif
{"title":"Statistical power in UK genetic syndrome research; evidence from studies of Down syndrome, Fragile X syndrome and Williams syndrome as model syndrome groups.","authors":"Emily K Farran, Sophia Alexiou, Henrik Danielsson, Camilla Orefice, Laura Cristescu, Elizabeth Pellicano, Jo Van Herwegen, Gaia Scerif","doi":"10.1111/bjdp.70065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Research on genetic syndromes is vital to our understanding of how development unfolds, but the rarity of genetic syndromes can mean that studies are carried out with small sample sizes. Small sample sizes can reduce the statistical power of a study to produce reliable and replicable results. Here, we review all UK journal articles on three target genetic syndromes published from 2013 to 2022. There were 368 eligible articles. The median sample size of genetic syndrome groups was N = 30, and only 6.5% of articles reported a power analysis. Power analysis was performed on the 123 articles classed as 'Cognitive' research, as a test case. This demonstrated an average power of only 54% for a medium effect size and an alpha of 0.05. This is well below the recommended threshold of 80% power. The low power of UK genetic syndrome research has consequences for the replicability of the field due to the risk of Type II errors and reduced precision in effect size estimates, as well as implications for the communities that this research seeks to serve. We provide suggestions for researchers, journal editors and funders for improving the replicability of the field of genetic syndrome research.</p>","PeriodicalId":51418,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Developmental Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Developmental Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bjdp.70065","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research on genetic syndromes is vital to our understanding of how development unfolds, but the rarity of genetic syndromes can mean that studies are carried out with small sample sizes. Small sample sizes can reduce the statistical power of a study to produce reliable and replicable results. Here, we review all UK journal articles on three target genetic syndromes published from 2013 to 2022. There were 368 eligible articles. The median sample size of genetic syndrome groups was N = 30, and only 6.5% of articles reported a power analysis. Power analysis was performed on the 123 articles classed as 'Cognitive' research, as a test case. This demonstrated an average power of only 54% for a medium effect size and an alpha of 0.05. This is well below the recommended threshold of 80% power. The low power of UK genetic syndrome research has consequences for the replicability of the field due to the risk of Type II errors and reduced precision in effect size estimates, as well as implications for the communities that this research seeks to serve. We provide suggestions for researchers, journal editors and funders for improving the replicability of the field of genetic syndrome research.

英国遗传综合征研究的统计力来自唐氏综合征,脆性X综合征和威廉姆斯综合征作为模型综合征组的研究证据。
遗传综合征的研究对我们理解发育过程至关重要,但遗传综合征的罕见可能意味着研究的样本量很小。小样本量会降低研究产生可靠和可重复结果的统计能力。在这里,我们回顾了2013年至2022年发表的关于三种目标遗传综合征的所有英国期刊文章。共有368件符合条件的物品。遗传综合征组的中位样本量为N = 30,只有6.5%的文章报告了功效分析。作为测试案例,我们对123篇归类为“认知”研究的文章进行了功率分析。这表明中等效应大小的平均功效只有54%,alpha值为0.05。这远低于80%功率的推荐阈值。由于II型错误的风险和效应大小估计精度的降低,英国遗传综合征研究的低功率对该领域的可重复性产生了影响,同时也对本研究寻求服务的社区产生了影响。我们为研究人员、期刊编辑和资助者提供建议,以提高遗传综合征研究领域的可重复性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Journal of Developmental Psychology
British Journal of Developmental Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Developmental Psychology publishes full-length, empirical, conceptual, review and discussion papers, as well as brief reports, in all of the following areas: - motor, perceptual, cognitive, social and emotional development in infancy; - social, emotional and personality development in childhood, adolescence and adulthood; - cognitive and socio-cognitive development in childhood, adolescence and adulthood, including the development of language, mathematics, theory of mind, drawings, spatial cognition, biological and societal understanding; - atypical development, including developmental disorders, learning difficulties/disabilities and sensory impairments;
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书