What about the art? Interpreting creative outputs in arts-based youth mental health research: the RESPOND framework.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Paul Cooke, Nicola Shaughnessy, Raginie Duara, Ruth Herbert, Emma Williams, Siobhan Hugh-Jones, Luke Allder
{"title":"What about the art? Interpreting creative outputs in arts-based youth mental health research: the RESPOND framework.","authors":"Paul Cooke, Nicola Shaughnessy, Raginie Duara, Ruth Herbert, Emma Williams, Siobhan Hugh-Jones, Luke Allder","doi":"10.1080/17533015.2026.2724291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Arts based research practices (ABRPs) are increasingly used to support children and young people (CYP) experiencing complex mental health challenges. Yet the artistic outputs generated within such research are rarely analysed, potentially limiting understanding of how creative artefacts can contribute to meaning making and programme evaluation. This study, part of the UKRI-funded CREATE project, addresses this methodological gap by examining how CYP, researchers and arts practitioners approach the interpretation of youth produced art within mental health research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An initial scoping review identified existing approaches to analysing creative products in ABRP mental health studies. Guided by key questions emerging from the review, two interdisciplinary \"living labs\" (one using visual art and one using drama) were conducted with adolescent co-researchers, academic researchers, and arts facilitators. Data included group discussions, fieldnotes, creative artefacts and video recordings. A hybrid of framework and thematic analysis generated five analytical domains alongside overarching relational and ethical considerations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants preferred a sequenced, dialogic process beginning with art immanent observation and moving toward contextual calibration. Group interpretation broadened perspectives, while protected solo stages safeguarded individual voice. Interpretation shifted dynamically across affective and cognitive modes. These findings coalesced into the RESPOND framework, capturing how meaning can emerge through embodied response, pattern recognition, temporal reframing and dialogue.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RESPOND provides a flexible, practice-sensitive method for integrating creative outputs into mental health research. It strengthens interpretive rigour while preserving the relational, ethical and participatory values central to ABRP with young people.</p>","PeriodicalId":45944,"journal":{"name":"Arts & Health","volume":" ","pages":"1-17"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arts & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17533015.2026.2724291","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Arts based research practices (ABRPs) are increasingly used to support children and young people (CYP) experiencing complex mental health challenges. Yet the artistic outputs generated within such research are rarely analysed, potentially limiting understanding of how creative artefacts can contribute to meaning making and programme evaluation. This study, part of the UKRI-funded CREATE project, addresses this methodological gap by examining how CYP, researchers and arts practitioners approach the interpretation of youth produced art within mental health research.

Methods: An initial scoping review identified existing approaches to analysing creative products in ABRP mental health studies. Guided by key questions emerging from the review, two interdisciplinary "living labs" (one using visual art and one using drama) were conducted with adolescent co-researchers, academic researchers, and arts facilitators. Data included group discussions, fieldnotes, creative artefacts and video recordings. A hybrid of framework and thematic analysis generated five analytical domains alongside overarching relational and ethical considerations.

Results: Participants preferred a sequenced, dialogic process beginning with art immanent observation and moving toward contextual calibration. Group interpretation broadened perspectives, while protected solo stages safeguarded individual voice. Interpretation shifted dynamically across affective and cognitive modes. These findings coalesced into the RESPOND framework, capturing how meaning can emerge through embodied response, pattern recognition, temporal reframing and dialogue.

Conclusions: RESPOND provides a flexible, practice-sensitive method for integrating creative outputs into mental health research. It strengthens interpretive rigour while preserving the relational, ethical and participatory values central to ABRP with young people.

那艺术呢?解读以艺术为基础的青年心理健康研究中的创造性产出:回应框架。
背景:基于艺术的研究实践(ABRPs)越来越多地用于支持经历复杂心理健康挑战的儿童和青少年(CYP)。然而,在此类研究中产生的艺术成果很少被分析,这可能限制了对创造性人工制品如何有助于意义制定和项目评估的理解。这项研究是ukri资助的CREATE项目的一部分,通过研究CYP、研究人员和艺术从业者如何在心理健康研究中解读青年创作的艺术,解决了这一方法上的差距。方法:初步范围审查确定了在ABRP心理健康研究中分析创意产品的现有方法。在综述中出现的关键问题的指导下,两个跨学科的“生活实验室”(一个使用视觉艺术,一个使用戏剧)由青少年共同研究人员,学术研究人员和艺术促进者进行。数据包括小组讨论、实地记录、创造性的人工制品和录像。框架和主题分析的混合产生了五个分析领域,以及总体关系和伦理考虑。结果:参与者更喜欢一个有序的对话过程,从艺术内在观察开始,走向语境校准。集体诠释拓宽了视角,而受保护的独奏舞台则保障了个人的声音。口译在情感和认知模式之间动态转换。这些发现整合到响应框架中,捕捉意义如何通过具体化反应、模式识别、时间重构和对话出现。结论:响应提供了一个灵活的,实践敏感的方法,将创造性产出纳入心理健康研究。它加强了解释的严谨性,同时保留了关系、道德和参与价值观,这些价值观是ABRP与年轻人的核心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Arts & Health
Arts & Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
12
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书