Compositional Complexity in Text and Images.

IF 3.7 Q1 LINGUISTICS
Neurobiology of Language Pub Date : 2026-07-09 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1162/NOL.a.271
Helena Balabin, Antonietta Gabriella Liuzzi, Kevin Statz, Marie-Francine Moens, Patrick Dupont, Rik Vandenberghe
{"title":"Compositional Complexity in Text and Images.","authors":"Helena Balabin, Antonietta Gabriella Liuzzi, Kevin Statz, Marie-Francine Moens, Patrick Dupont, Rik Vandenberghe","doi":"10.1162/NOL.a.271","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Compositionality enables us to derive the meaning of a complex whole from the syntax and semantics of its individual parts. While compositional processing has primarily been studied in language, similar principles apply to visual scenes, in which meaning can be derived from their individual parts and the relationships between them. In this study, we therefore aimed to explore whether there is a shared neural basis for compositional processing in text and images. Based on abstract meaning representation graphs for text, commonly used to capture \"who is doing what to whom\", and action graph annotations for visual scenes, we defined an analogous graph depth-based notion of compositional complexity. By conducting a functional magnetic resonance imaging experiment in which participants view text-image pairs from the Common Objects in Context-Actions data set, we aimed to identify brain activity patterns related to compositional processing through a combination of univariate and multivariate pattern analysis. Specifically, we hypothesized that there are shared brain regions-such as the pars opercularis, pars triangularis or anterior temporal lobe-involved in processing compositional complexity across text and images. Alternatively, there might exist distinct regions for processing compositional complexity in text and images, without any substantial cross-modal overlap. Our results provided no evidence in support of either hypothesis: no significant neural responses to compositional complexity were observed, in either a shared or modality-specific manner. Given the rigorous control of confounds in our study design, the operationalization of compositional complexity itself may underlie the null result.</p>","PeriodicalId":34845,"journal":{"name":"Neurobiology of Language","volume":"7 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13506228/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurobiology of Language","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/NOL.a.271","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Compositionality enables us to derive the meaning of a complex whole from the syntax and semantics of its individual parts. While compositional processing has primarily been studied in language, similar principles apply to visual scenes, in which meaning can be derived from their individual parts and the relationships between them. In this study, we therefore aimed to explore whether there is a shared neural basis for compositional processing in text and images. Based on abstract meaning representation graphs for text, commonly used to capture "who is doing what to whom", and action graph annotations for visual scenes, we defined an analogous graph depth-based notion of compositional complexity. By conducting a functional magnetic resonance imaging experiment in which participants view text-image pairs from the Common Objects in Context-Actions data set, we aimed to identify brain activity patterns related to compositional processing through a combination of univariate and multivariate pattern analysis. Specifically, we hypothesized that there are shared brain regions-such as the pars opercularis, pars triangularis or anterior temporal lobe-involved in processing compositional complexity across text and images. Alternatively, there might exist distinct regions for processing compositional complexity in text and images, without any substantial cross-modal overlap. Our results provided no evidence in support of either hypothesis: no significant neural responses to compositional complexity were observed, in either a shared or modality-specific manner. Given the rigorous control of confounds in our study design, the operationalization of compositional complexity itself may underlie the null result.

文本和图像的合成复杂性。
组合性使我们能够从单个部分的语法和语义中推导出一个复杂整体的意义。虽然组合处理主要是在语言中进行研究,但类似的原理也适用于视觉场景,其中意义可以从它们的各个部分及其之间的关系中获得。因此,在本研究中,我们旨在探讨文本和图像的合成处理是否存在共同的神经基础。基于文本的抽象意义表示图(通常用于捕获“谁对谁做了什么”)和视觉场景的动作图注释,我们定义了一个类似的基于图深度的组合复杂性概念。通过进行功能性磁共振成像实验,参与者查看上下文-动作数据集中常见对象的文本-图像对,我们旨在通过单变量和多变量模式分析相结合来识别与构图处理相关的大脑活动模式。具体地说,我们假设有一些共同的大脑区域——如脑包部、三角部或颞叶前部——参与处理文本和图像的合成复杂性。或者,可能存在不同的区域来处理文本和图像中的组合复杂性,而没有任何实质性的跨模态重叠。我们的研究结果没有提供任何证据来支持这两种假设:没有观察到对成分复杂性的显著神经反应,无论是以共享的方式还是以特定的方式。考虑到我们研究设计中对混杂因素的严格控制,成分复杂性本身的操作化可能是无效结果的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurobiology of Language
Neurobiology of Language Social Sciences-Linguistics and Language
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
32
审稿时长
17 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书