Physiologic Mechanisms of Response to Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation.

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 Medicine
Sleep Pub Date : 2026-08-25 DOI:10.1093/sleep/zsag227
Linda C Magaña, Yash Dixit, Bruno Saconi, Brendan T Keenan, Everett G Seay, Alan R Schwartz, Raj C Dedhia
{"title":"Physiologic Mechanisms of Response to Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation.","authors":"Linda C Magaña, Yash Dixit, Bruno Saconi, Brendan T Keenan, Everett G Seay, Alan R Schwartz, Raj C Dedhia","doi":"10.1093/sleep/zsag227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study objectives: </strong>To evaluate the relationship between physiologic mechanisms under drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) and polysomnographic response to hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HGNS).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In an NIH-funded interventional trial, thirty subjects with HGNS devices underwent DISE with pneumotachometer, pharyngeal manometry, and positive airway pressure titration. On the previous night, subjects underwent a split-night polysomnogram (first portion without HGNS and second at a single clinically-determined voltage) in the supine position. Responder status was determined by a 50% reduction in supine apnea-hypopnea index (AHI). Groups (responders vs. nonresponders) were compared using the Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test, and Spearman's rho was used to assess correlations between physiologic mechanisms under DISE and polysomnographic response.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients (n = 30) were generally older (64.3 ± 8.9 years), female (56.7%), and overweight (BMI 28.1 ± 3.1 kg/m2) with severe OSA (supine AHI 47.7 ± 25.4 events/hour). Among 14 responders and 16 nonresponders, there was no statistical difference in baseline collapsibility (PhOP, 5.9 ± 2.4 vs 7.2 ± 3.7 cmH2O, p = 0.39) or baseline inspiratory epiglottic pressure (Pepi,-17.2 ± 9.0 vs -18.6 ± 12.8 cmH2O, p = 0.99). Improvements in collapsibility (rho = 0.70, p = 0.0001) and inspiratory epiglottic pressure (rho = -0.70, p = 0.0001) with HGNS were strongly associated with reduction in supine AHI.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this small interventional study, decreases in collapsibility and effort during DISE are markers of clinical response to HGNS therapy. Our novel findings demonstrate responses to acute physiologic interventions during DISE translate to natural sleep outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":22018,"journal":{"name":"Sleep","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsag227","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study objectives: To evaluate the relationship between physiologic mechanisms under drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) and polysomnographic response to hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HGNS).

Materials and methods: In an NIH-funded interventional trial, thirty subjects with HGNS devices underwent DISE with pneumotachometer, pharyngeal manometry, and positive airway pressure titration. On the previous night, subjects underwent a split-night polysomnogram (first portion without HGNS and second at a single clinically-determined voltage) in the supine position. Responder status was determined by a 50% reduction in supine apnea-hypopnea index (AHI). Groups (responders vs. nonresponders) were compared using the Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test, and Spearman's rho was used to assess correlations between physiologic mechanisms under DISE and polysomnographic response.

Results: Patients (n = 30) were generally older (64.3 ± 8.9 years), female (56.7%), and overweight (BMI 28.1 ± 3.1 kg/m2) with severe OSA (supine AHI 47.7 ± 25.4 events/hour). Among 14 responders and 16 nonresponders, there was no statistical difference in baseline collapsibility (PhOP, 5.9 ± 2.4 vs 7.2 ± 3.7 cmH2O, p = 0.39) or baseline inspiratory epiglottic pressure (Pepi,-17.2 ± 9.0 vs -18.6 ± 12.8 cmH2O, p = 0.99). Improvements in collapsibility (rho = 0.70, p = 0.0001) and inspiratory epiglottic pressure (rho = -0.70, p = 0.0001) with HGNS were strongly associated with reduction in supine AHI.

Conclusions: In this small interventional study, decreases in collapsibility and effort during DISE are markers of clinical response to HGNS therapy. Our novel findings demonstrate responses to acute physiologic interventions during DISE translate to natural sleep outcomes.

舌下神经刺激反应的生理机制。
研究目的:探讨药物诱导睡眠内镜(DISE)下生理机制与舌下神经刺激(HGNS)下多导睡眠图反应的关系。材料和方法:在美国国立卫生研究院资助的一项介入性试验中,30名使用HGNS装置的受试者使用气测仪、咽压仪和气道正压滴定法进行了DISE。在前一天晚上,受试者在仰卧位进行分夜多导睡眠图(第一部分没有HGNS,第二部分在单一临床确定的电压下)。反应状态由仰卧呼吸暂停低通气指数(AHI)降低50%来确定。使用Wilcoxon秩和检验比较各组(反应者和无反应者),并使用Spearman rho来评估DISE下生理机制与多导睡眠图反应之间的相关性。结果:30例患者普遍年龄较大(64.3±8.9岁),女性(56.7%),体重超重(BMI 28.1±3.1 kg/m2),伴有重度OSA(仰卧位AHI 47.7±25.4事件/小时)。在14名应答者和16名无应答者中,基线湿陷性(PhOP, 5.9±2.4 vs 7.2±3.7 cmH2O, p = 0.39)或基线吸气会厌压(Pepi,-17.2±9.0 vs -18.6±12.8 cmH2O, p = 0.99)无统计学差异。HGNS患者可塌陷性(rho = 0.70, p = 0.0001)和会音吸气压力(rho = -0.70, p = 0.0001)的改善与仰卧位AHI的降低密切相关。结论:在这项小型介入研究中,DISE期间溃散性和努力程度的降低是临床对HGNS治疗反应的标志。我们的新发现表明,在急性睡眠干预期间,对急性睡眠干预的反应转化为自然睡眠结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sleep
Sleep Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
10.70%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: SLEEP® publishes findings from studies conducted at any level of analysis, including: Genes Molecules Cells Physiology Neural systems and circuits Behavior and cognition Self-report SLEEP® publishes articles that use a wide variety of scientific approaches and address a broad range of topics. These may include, but are not limited to: Basic and neuroscience studies of sleep and circadian mechanisms In vitro and animal models of sleep, circadian rhythms, and human disorders Pre-clinical human investigations, including the measurement and manipulation of sleep and circadian rhythms Studies in clinical or population samples. These may address factors influencing sleep and circadian rhythms (e.g., development and aging, and social and environmental influences) and relationships between sleep, circadian rhythms, health, and disease Clinical trials, epidemiology studies, implementation, and dissemination research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书