Identification of the Medicine-Related Priorities for People With Parkinson's During Hospitalisation: A Systematic Review Using Meta-Ethnography.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Parkinson's Disease Pub Date : 2026-08-25 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1155/padi/8428752
Anna Delf, David Wright
{"title":"Identification of the Medicine-Related Priorities for People With Parkinson's During Hospitalisation: A Systematic Review Using Meta-Ethnography.","authors":"Anna Delf, David Wright","doi":"10.1155/padi/8428752","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>People with Parkinson's (PwP) experience disproportionately higher rates of hospitalisation, where they encounter many medication-related challenges. Although interventions have been developed to address these issues, medication-related problems persist, and the patient's voice is largely absent from their design.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To explore medication-related priorities during hospitalisation from the perspective of PwP to inform the development of future patient-led interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review using meta-ethnography was conducted and registered with PROSPERO. A SPICE-informed search (Setting, Perspective, Intervention, Comparison, Evaluation) was undertaken across MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Embase and Google Scholar in June 2025. Eligible qualitative and mixed-method studies explored the perspectives of PwP regarding inpatient medication-related care. Two reviewers independently screened studies using Covidence. First- and second-order constructs were synthesised into third-order constructs representing medication-related priorities. Reporting followed Enhancing Meta-Ethnography Reporting Guidance (eMERGe), and methodological quality was appraised using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) checklist.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four studies met the inclusion criteria. Four overarching themes reflected the core medication-related priorities of PwP during hospitalisation: timely and accurate medication administration, autonomy, access to skilled and knowledgeable staff, and advocacy to support patient needs. These priorities informed the development of an interpretive conceptual framework illustrating the interaction between PwP medication-related priorities and hospital systems.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings suggest the need to strengthen systems supporting timely medication administration, enable self-administration where appropriate, promote flexibility and person-centred care, and implement Parkinson's clinical champions to advocate for and support PwP throughout hospitalisation.</p>","PeriodicalId":19907,"journal":{"name":"Parkinson's Disease","volume":"2026 ","pages":"8428752"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13504675/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Parkinson's Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/padi/8428752","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: People with Parkinson's (PwP) experience disproportionately higher rates of hospitalisation, where they encounter many medication-related challenges. Although interventions have been developed to address these issues, medication-related problems persist, and the patient's voice is largely absent from their design.

Objectives: To explore medication-related priorities during hospitalisation from the perspective of PwP to inform the development of future patient-led interventions.

Methods: A systematic review using meta-ethnography was conducted and registered with PROSPERO. A SPICE-informed search (Setting, Perspective, Intervention, Comparison, Evaluation) was undertaken across MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Embase and Google Scholar in June 2025. Eligible qualitative and mixed-method studies explored the perspectives of PwP regarding inpatient medication-related care. Two reviewers independently screened studies using Covidence. First- and second-order constructs were synthesised into third-order constructs representing medication-related priorities. Reporting followed Enhancing Meta-Ethnography Reporting Guidance (eMERGe), and methodological quality was appraised using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) checklist.

Results: Four studies met the inclusion criteria. Four overarching themes reflected the core medication-related priorities of PwP during hospitalisation: timely and accurate medication administration, autonomy, access to skilled and knowledgeable staff, and advocacy to support patient needs. These priorities informed the development of an interpretive conceptual framework illustrating the interaction between PwP medication-related priorities and hospital systems.

Conclusions: Findings suggest the need to strengthen systems supporting timely medication administration, enable self-administration where appropriate, promote flexibility and person-centred care, and implement Parkinson's clinical champions to advocate for and support PwP throughout hospitalisation.

帕金森患者住院期间药物相关优先事项的识别:使用元人种学的系统综述。
背景:帕金森病患者(PwP)的住院率过高,在那里他们遇到了许多与药物相关的挑战。尽管已经开发出了解决这些问题的干预措施,但与药物有关的问题仍然存在,而且患者的声音在很大程度上没有出现在这些干预措施的设计中。目的:从PwP的角度探讨住院期间与药物相关的优先事项,为未来患者主导的干预措施的发展提供信息。方法:采用元人种志进行系统综述,并在PROSPERO注册。我们于2025年6月在MEDLINE、PsycINFO、CINAHL、Embase和谷歌Scholar上进行了spice信息检索(设置、视角、干预、比较、评估)。合格的定性和混合方法研究探讨了PwP对住院患者药物相关护理的看法。两位审稿人独立筛选了使用covid - ence的研究。一阶和二阶构念被合成为代表药物相关优先级的三阶构念。报告遵循《加强元人种学报告指南》(eMERGe),并使用关键评估技能计划(CASP)检查表对方法质量进行评估。结果:4项研究符合纳入标准。四个总体主题反映了PwP在住院期间与药物有关的核心优先事项:及时和准确的药物管理、自主、获得熟练和知识渊博的工作人员以及支持患者需求的宣传。这些优先事项提示了解释性概念框架的发展,说明了PwP药物相关优先事项与医院系统之间的相互作用。结论:研究结果表明,需要加强支持及时给药的系统,在适当情况下允许自我给药,促进灵活性和以人为本的护理,并实施帕金森临床倡导者,在整个住院期间倡导和支持PwP。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Parkinson's Disease
Parkinson's Disease CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
3.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: Parkinson’s Disease is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to the epidemiology, etiology, pathogenesis, genetics, cellular, molecular and neurophysiology, as well as the diagnosis and treatment of Parkinson’s disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书